Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Behringer DCX2496 x-over, better than passive?
Behringer DCX2496 x-over, better than passive?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th March 2006, 03:58 AM   #51
AR2 is offline AR2  United States
Master Burner
AR2's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
And just to add this.
Before I decided on what speakers to build I made up my mind after I visited Mr. Linkwitz who happen to live just a few blocks from me. His opinion is very strong - nothing but active. When someone with his name and knowledge makes statement like that I certainly will take that as a definitive answer in question pasive vs. active crossover.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2006, 05:07 AM   #52
jan.didden is offline jan.didden  Europe
diyAudio Member
jan.didden's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The great city of Turnhout, BE
Originally posted by fazman
comparative listening tests are an interesting thing. Many times what I thought was a "better sound" I found later to be the opposite. I wouldn't want to dispute either way if one DAC sounds better than the next.
What I would be really interested in knowing is whether any one has done listening tests on a loudspeaker using the digital crossover and then again using a passive crossover on the same loudspeaker. What conclusions were made then? Surely the differences would be (whether good or bad) significant enough to reach some opinions.

I dfid sort of that a few weeks ago. I had in my room two totally different systems. A consisted of Martin Logan Sequel II speakers driven by a power amp of my own design, passive level controls and Rotel 950 CD player. B consisted of two way speakers of my own design with 4 * 50mm Jordans for mid/high and 2 * 150mm Jordans for low, each side, bi-amped with vintage, heavily modified Sony power amps and a Behringer (output modified) driven from the digital output of a Philiops CD950. I had two identical CD's in the players and was switching between systems using the CD remotes switching between play and pause. We (4 friends and me) spend about an hour tweaking the Behringer settings to try to bring B as close to A in absolute level, freq response etc, by ear. At the end we came very close but there was still a difference we heard.

Now for the interesting part: initially we more or less unconsiouslly used the big Martin Logans as references, but after a lot of switching we lost track of what was playing at any one time, and the preferences would switch back and forth. At one time one of us remarked, for instance, that he clearly preferred the stronger and more extended bass of the Martin Logans (they are physically imposing) to the Jordans, while in fact he was listening to the Jordans, and was embarrassed when I pointed that out. We had several of these occurences, and later laughed about them good-humoured, but the lesson was that even if there is a difference you tend to favour the more physically impressive system. Which is nothing new and extensively documented, and used by audio marketeers of course but it can be sobering to be confronted with it.

Jan Didden
Cable: a potential source of trouble interconnecting two other potential sources of trouble - Erik Margan
Linear Audio pubs and articles . The SilentSwitcher now at diyaudio store SilentSwitcher. Keeping in touch with SY.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2006, 12:46 PM   #53
fazman is offline fazman  Canada
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario
Really cool.
I sometimes listen to my set up in complete darkness so I can't see my own speakers. After listening to some Norah Jones last night I surprised myself to see that all that sound was coming from a 5" woofer and 1" tweeter.
The eyes will sometimes convince you of things your ears don't believe.
  Reply With Quote


Behringer DCX2496 x-over, better than passive?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with Behringer DCX2496 tommycomm Digital Line Level 1 4th June 2008 07:33 PM
Behringer DCX2496 12 Cents Swap Meet 0 29th July 2007 08:27 AM
Behringer DCX2496 RAAMaudio Swap Meet 0 19th February 2006 07:15 PM
$325 Behringer DCX2496 timsch75 Digital Line Level 0 11th September 2004 03:30 AM
Behringer DCX2496 12v ps Flyingeyepro Car Audio 0 30th July 2004 08:05 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio