) just great for us less technical types !Hi guys!
I got my 9038q2m board few days ago (VR1.06). From stock version it sounds very good, at least much better, than hifime Android ES9018 DAC. But even powered from superior quality linear PSU (+/- 15V) it still sounds like plastic, far from smoth analog lifelike music. That is why I still prefer old multibit DACs instead of modern delta-sigma.
But in frames of subject let me notice the real sound improvement phases on this board.
I don't want to say much about digital things, will indicate just for reference (should be): clean lines of IIS, clean XOs, iso, bitperfect.
However the real magic, even in modern time still happens in the analog part of DAC.
First of all, as I said above - PSU. The main PSU with clean, linear phase\impedance (without tons of ultra HFs and LPFs) is realy must to be in any DAC implementation. It is absolutely needed because the most significant part of music is located in the small signals. Small signals is a glue for anything in the world of sounds. From practice, "Virtual battery" schematic is a good choice (at least) to go down to 16 bit and deeper accuracy. When the first PSU is clean, all other regs and LDO's will do their job much better. Second step in list, but really in "the same league" with PSU quality is the i/v converion stage. I have tried a lot of different variations of i/v on OPamps (and discret) in past, but after current transformers (very low primary DC resistance of ~5-10 Ohm with enough inductane for LF), I have realy forgot about any OPs and other electronic devices in i/v stage. This DAC now is very close to my PCM63s. It is very simple to put transformers into layout of this board - just to remove a few elements and to solder instead of them pins for primary and secondary coils.
I got my 9038q2m board few days ago (VR1.06). From stock version it sounds very good, at least much better, than hifime Android ES9018 DAC. But even powered from superior quality linear PSU (+/- 15V) it still sounds like plastic, far from smoth analog lifelike music. That is why I still prefer old multibit DACs instead of modern delta-sigma.
But in frames of subject let me notice the real sound improvement phases on this board.
I don't want to say much about digital things, will indicate just for reference (should be): clean lines of IIS, clean XOs, iso, bitperfect.
However the real magic, even in modern time still happens in the analog part of DAC.
First of all, as I said above - PSU. The main PSU with clean, linear phase\impedance (without tons of ultra HFs and LPFs) is realy must to be in any DAC implementation. It is absolutely needed because the most significant part of music is located in the small signals. Small signals is a glue for anything in the world of sounds. From practice, "Virtual battery" schematic is a good choice (at least) to go down to 16 bit and deeper accuracy. When the first PSU is clean, all other regs and LDO's will do their job much better. Second step in list, but really in "the same league" with PSU quality is the i/v converion stage. I have tried a lot of different variations of i/v on OPamps (and discret) in past, but after current transformers (very low primary DC resistance of ~5-10 Ohm with enough inductane for LF), I have realy forgot about any OPs and other electronic devices in i/v stage. This DAC now is very close to my PCM63s. It is very simple to put transformers into layout of this board - just to remove a few elements and to solder instead of them pins for primary and secondary coils.
Attachments
Kudos to those who have already produced a DAC that you like.
My hope here to try to quantify as much as possible which mods affect sound quality and how much. To make the best DAC from an ES9038 takes several mods, some of which would require reprogramming the microcontroller on the PCB. Unfortunately, that would probably require going getting the datasheet and being silenced by nondisclosure requirements. Therefore, my intent will be to limit my mods to what can be done and still speak about it publicly. Regarding IV stages, I might like to try a couple, a simple one, and a slightly more complex one, and see how much difference there is in sound quality, if any. Regarding the best sound quality possible from an ES9038, one probably needs to look no farther than a Benchmark DAC-3 which is on the Stereophile A+ recommended equipment list. We aren't going to be able to match that here, but I would like to see how close we can come while trying to keep the cost of the mods reasonably low.
Benchmark DAC3 HGC D/A preamplifier-headphone amplifier | Stereophile.com
My hope here to try to quantify as much as possible which mods affect sound quality and how much. To make the best DAC from an ES9038 takes several mods, some of which would require reprogramming the microcontroller on the PCB. Unfortunately, that would probably require going getting the datasheet and being silenced by nondisclosure requirements. Therefore, my intent will be to limit my mods to what can be done and still speak about it publicly. Regarding IV stages, I might like to try a couple, a simple one, and a slightly more complex one, and see how much difference there is in sound quality, if any. Regarding the best sound quality possible from an ES9038, one probably needs to look no farther than a Benchmark DAC-3 which is on the Stereophile A+ recommended equipment list. We aren't going to be able to match that here, but I would like to see how close we can come while trying to keep the cost of the mods reasonably low.
Benchmark DAC3 HGC D/A preamplifier-headphone amplifier | Stereophile.com
Last edited:
It is thoroidal, high permeability core material. Let's say author's device of one german specialist.
Specs:
prim. inductance 16H
prim. DC resistance 5 Ohms
sec. DC resistance 140 Ohms
ratio 1:3.5
There is only 10kOhm in parallel with secondary (no resistor in primary), no any other LPFs. secondaries directly to RCAs.
For this VR1.06 board:
FR (sinus, Hz) vs output level (VRMS) loaded to 1M of Oscilloscope:
10=2.29 (-1.1dB@60Hz)
15=2.35 (-0.9dB)
20=2.47 (-0.5dB)
40=2.55 (-0.2dB)
60~100к=2.61
Thanks.
What do you think about this board with the ES9038Q2M chip?
HiFi ES9038Q2M The ES9038 I2S Input Decoder DAC supports DSD | eBay
Thanks.
What do you think about this board with the ES9038Q2M chip?
It only has an IIS input, no SPDIF. That may make it more expensive to get something working. Many PCs and soundcards already have some kind of SPDIF output, and MACs have an optical SPDIF output hidden away a little in the analog headphone jack.
Sorry, but it is vice versa and similiar to original graph from ebay seller's page.
X = Connection
O = Open
