Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

tda1387 dac pcb "front end"
tda1387 dac pcb "front end"
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th June 2018, 02:19 AM   #211
stellarelephant is offline stellarelephant  United States
diyAudio Member
 
stellarelephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Western NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_garman View Post
Although the RPi can technically draw up to 2A, if you are using it purely to shuffle PCM bits onto the I2S bus, power utilization should be well under 2A..
Well, I tried it. And...I have had great success powering my Pi with a 1A PSU after all! Boots every time and runs indefinitely. I am using another one of Greg Stewart's modified Jameco linear wall warts (4 total on my Pi stack now).

Let me just say that this PSU stomps all over my iFi iPower.

I could STILL hear noise from the iPower on the Pi, even with an isolator board in use! Now, with my entire stack powered by these bargain linear supplies, the noise is gone. The treble is cleaner and more relaxed as well...who knows why. Hard to believe. And it costs $20! Plus the cost of parts to mod it...not sure how much total. But I know Greg is planning to share his Jameco mods soon with a photo tutorial. Good stuff.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2018, 09:22 PM   #212
matt_garman is offline matt_garman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
tda1387 dac pcb "front end"
Sorry for the radio silence, all. I've taken a break from DACs to work on several side projects. The last one is still on-going, but I'm excited to get back to DAC talk!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexandre View Post
Are you using digital volume?
Yes, I am.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexandre View Post
Matt, I should say I havenīt tried the simple PNP circuit, I should have tried it when I was experimenting with a single 1387. Maybe I will.

So did you perceive any difference in noise with higher sample rates?

An alternative is to tweak the "BREF" voltage on your schematic, it may help you get rid of noise.
I haven't had a chance to try higher sample rates. (Keep forgetting!)

Abraxalito helped me arrive at the BREF values. I can explain from rote how the BREF value was derived, but my understanding of this is superficial at best. First, I'm powering the tda1387 chip(s) with 5v. Per the DS, that results in output voltage compliance of 3.5v. Best to quote Abraxalito on the rest:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abraxalito
We need to arrange the transistor to give no more than 3.5V on its source (or emitter if bipolar) which means biassing the gate (base) lower by the threshold voltage (or a diode drop for bipolar). With MOSFETs the gate threshold voltage is quite variable, much more variable than for a base-emitter junction. The J327 has a very low threshold voltage for a MOSFET which is one thing making it suitable for this application, its maximum is 1V (at 1mA drain current) but the min is 0.3V. So we need to set the gate voltage to accommodate the worst case (1V) threshold and this means setting the gate to 2.5V
That was in the context of using a SSM3J327R MOSFET for that common-base transistor.

A similar thought process leads to a BREF of 2.8V for a BC807 PNP transistor used in this position.

I have tried both the J327 with BREF=2.5v and BC807 with BREF=2.8v, but I have not yet tried other values for BREF.


Quote:
Originally Posted by stellarelephant View Post
I am using another one of Greg Stewart's modified Jameco linear wall warts (4 total on my Pi stack now).

Let me just say that this PSU stomps all over my iFi iPower.

And it costs $20! Plus the cost of parts to mod it...not sure how much total. But I know Greg is planning to share his Jameco mods soon with a photo tutorial.
Did he ever post the details of that?

While you're experimenting with power supplies, have you tried these ultracapacitors as discussed in this thread? They are basically using them like batteries because their capacity is so high relative to the current draw of the application. But so far only positive comments! (Personally, I'm a little scared of them!)
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2018, 02:24 AM   #213
abraxalito is online now abraxalito  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito
I did experiments using ultracaps to power my TDA1387 DACs. Sure they worked great but a fairly big work-up to use them, not to mention the sheer bulk makes them impractical for portable applications. In the end I ditched them when I went over to active I/V as the bass was at least as good with that as for passive I/V plus supercaps.
__________________
'The total potential here must be nothing less than astronomical.'
'Nothing less. The number 10 raised almost literally to the power of infinity.'
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2018, 06:27 PM   #214
jambul is offline jambul  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
any improvement betwen dual mono and single dac chip?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2018, 03:13 AM   #215
stellarelephant is offline stellarelephant  United States
diyAudio Member
 
stellarelephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Western NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt_garman View Post
Did he ever post the details of that?

While you're experimenting with power supplies, have you tried these ultracapacitors as discussed in this thread? They are basically using them like batteries because their capacity is so high relative to the current draw of the application. But so far only positive comments! (Personally, I'm a little scared of them!)
No, Greg hasn't shared the Jameco mods yet. I asked for an update but haven't heard from him for a few weeks. I know he is busy playing around with all kinds of digital source gear, including the supercaps (yes I am following Ian's thread too).

After hearing such drastic differences in PSUs in my tests, and reading so many favorable impressions of powering DACs with LifePo4 batteries, I am VERY interested in the supercaps. I just need to learn what circuit is necessary to use them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2018, 04:57 AM   #216
museguy is offline museguy  Mexico
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Mexico City
tda1387 dac pcb "front end"
Hi matt_garman,
Thank you for all of your great work !

I am still enjoying the modified TDA137 that you and abraxalito gave me guidance.
Cayin N3 /Volumio > Raspberry Pi > Hifiberry Digi + > TDA1387 > JLH 1969 Amp > Pioneer SP-BS22-LR Speakers

Now setting up a desktop rig for headphones thinking:
Cayin N3 / Volumio > Raspberry Pi > ALLO - Kali i2s Reclocker > Hifiberry Digi + > TDA1387 > JLH 1969 Headphone Amp > HD650

Do you think your "TDA1387 DAC "front end" would work well in this configuration ?

Thank you !
- Mark
__________________
Internet Radio > Raspberry Pi or MacBook Pro > TDA1387 x8 DAC or ifi Nano >JLH1969 Headphone Amp >Sennheiser HD650 or Sony MDR7506 or Grado SR80 or ACS Custom IEM or Denon D2000
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2018, 06:31 PM   #217
matt_garman is offline matt_garman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
tda1387 dac pcb "front end"
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxalito View Post
I did experiments using ultracaps to power my TDA1387 DACs. Sure they worked great but a fairly big work-up to use them, not to mention the sheer bulk makes them impractical for portable applications. In the end I ditched them when I went over to active I/V as the bass was at least as good with that as for passive I/V plus supercaps.
I recently re-read some old tda1387 threads, and saw your "hexacap" made with ultracaps. In previous readings, I missed the detail that you used ultracaps (I thought you just paralleled a bunch of regular electrolytics). Do you remember which ultracaps you used? In the other thread, they are using single (or double just to get enough voltage) ultra caps - what I would call ultra-ultra caps because their current/capacity rating is just crazy, so no need (in theory) to parallel them.

At this point, I am curious about ultracaps, but content to watch others experiment with them.


Quote:
Originally Posted by jambul View Post
any improvement betwen dual mono and single dac chip?
When you say "dual mono", I assume you mean balanced output. From my perspective, there are a few benefits:
  • It forces the use of an i2s buffer of sorts. In my designs, I'm using the HC86, so I can invert the DATA signal for the "cold" part of balanced output; the word clock and frame size signals are buffered. (You could of course use a buffer for a single DAC chip as well, but you don't have to.)
  • The benefits of differential signaling are well-established: elimination of ground loops, common-mode noise reduction, etc.
  • Some downstream components may prefer (or demand) differential input. For example, the newer TI class-D amplifiers (e.g. tpa3251) require differential input for stereo BTL mode. Most implementations put an op-amp in front of the amplifier input to create the differential signal from a single-ended source. But if you already have a balanced signal, you can by-pass the extra circuitry.
  • Balanced is a superset of single-ended. So even if the DAC has balanced outputs, it implicitly also has single-ended outputs.
  • As Abraxalito has noted, having two DAC chips with their DATA lines interverted better balances the power supply loading.

For all the above reasons, I prefer balanced interconnects. However, if you ask me if I can hear a difference... well, ugh, umm...


Quote:
Originally Posted by museguy View Post
Now setting up a desktop rig for headphones thinking:
Cayin N3 / Volumio > Raspberry Pi > ALLO - Kali i2s Reclocker > Hifiberry Digi + > TDA1387 > JLH 1969 Headphone Amp > HD650

Do you think your "TDA1387 DAC "front end" would work well in this configuration ?
Hi Mark, I haven't really spent any time with the "front end" in quite a while. It would certainly work. But since you are using a Raspberry Pi, I would recommend one of the RPI HAT designs, and optionally put an Allo Kali (I2S reclocker) between the RPI and the DAC. I think this is the easiest/simplest way to get going with the tda1387 (but I'm highly biased!).

That said, I'm thinking about a new design that combines the ideas of the front end with a RPI HAT format. But right now it's just in the "thinking about it" stages.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


tda1387 dac pcb "front end"Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Nelson Pass "VFET2" Front End PCBs luvdunhill Swap Meet 35 26th June 2017 09:21 AM
FS: Nelson Pass "CSX1/2" "Buffered F6" Front End PCBs luvdunhill Swap Meet 7 10th December 2016 02:03 PM
suspending a small tweeter in front of woofer for "coaxial" effect? bikehorn Multi-Way 10 5th February 2015 10:50 PM
amplifier "front end bypass" toobnoob Car Audio 6 1st October 2009 01:18 AM
FS: very nice RAAL "FlatFoil" ribbon tweeters {NIB }, with custom made front plate yairf Swap Meet 3 2nd June 2009 09:25 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 14.29%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2018 diyAudio
Wiki