|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Question for DCX2496 owners
For my three ways, I have a DCX2496 running into two Panasonic Digital Receivers. The setup works well, but I need more power, and so am planning on getting a larger amp, something like the ATI 1806. Here is the question: How to control the volume ?. One could go: CD Digital Out Behringer volume control Amp Or CD Analog Out Volume control Behringer Amp The issue is how the Behringer reacts to a low volume analog input, i.e. having the volume control before the Behringer unit feeding it an analog signal. Some have suggested that Digital crossovers loose resolution if fed this way. I have tried it with the Behringer so I don’t know. Has any one any experience with this ?. Thanks, Branwell |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Scandinavia
|
If you can possibly feed a digital signal to the Behringer then do it.
That means you need the volume control after the Behringer. This causes a problem - you need up to 6 channels of tracking volume control. It is a strategic mistake by Behringer of not including at least a rudimentary volume control on the output. Petter |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Quote:
It would also increase the cost of the unit, for a feature that most users would not need.
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
|
Here is what I did. I bought 10 dual linear 10k motorized Alps pots from allelecronics.com at $3.5 each. They are 1 inch square and real nice. I wired the motor of each pot to the infrared remote control board through relays so that I can control each pot independently through a common hand-held remote control.
To solve the tracking problem, I placed a resistor in parallel with the output of each pot, -now all pots are matched to at last 1%. This resistor also turned the pots into the logarithmic devices. I then buffered all inputs and outputs with BB2604 op-amps and also place a 20 dB attenuator in a form of a resistor divider before the opamp driving the pot. End result is that I can now feed 10 V peak signal into the DCX2496. This 10 V are turned into 1 V by the attenuator and then further controlled by the pots. I am in the process of building an 8 channel system with active speakers. My fronts are 3-way dipoles, so I need 6 channels just for the fronts. My volume control ultimately will manage 16 channels. At this time I have the fronts working and the volume control is operational, but I think I might change the attenuator value to -15 db or so. Otherwise everything seems to work. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
|
Could you post a schematic Vadim? I'm doing something similar, except my crossover will be my Alesis 8 channel audio interface fed from my remote controlled media server computer with an RME Hammerfall ASIO card in my basement. The Alesis has a +4/-10dB switch, so I won't need the voltage divider. I'm doing VST plugins on the individual outputs for crossover filters. I have gathered a few candidates and will start actual testing this weekend. The freebies actually look like they have the most potential. I'm thinking I could use the serial port for controlling the volume pots.
__________________
"Most people just say what they know, the wise ones know just what to say." |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
|
Jan,
I apologies for the late response. My schematics are just plain hand written pages. However, I can describe the project, which is a work in progress, a bit better. There are several elements to my Master Volume Control Box. They are, - the buffer boards, the motor control board and the relay board. When all put together, I should be able to control any combination of about 6-8 motorized potentiometers with a common hand–held remote. I got all my boards from Mikkel, see http://stiftsbogtrykkeriet.dk/~mcs/Remote/index.html for details. Mikkel is a very nice guy and he ended up designing some of the boards to my specifications. Here is what I do, - I connect a relay in series with each pot. I then connect all pot-relay combinations in parallel. The Motor Control Board is then connected to control the entire thing. The motor control board is pre-programmed by Mikkel to accept commands from the hand-held remote’s keypad in order to control the relays and to turn ‘on’ and ‘off’ the H-bridge that controls the potentiometer’s motors. The Buffer Board contains two identical non-inverting op-amp configurations with provisions for gain, attenuation and signal by-pass. In my particular case, I use the DCX2496 for most cross-over functions except the open baffle EQ. This open baffle EQ is done in analog by the buffer board. It is just too much gain for DCX to handle. So, I feed the DCX a nearly 10 Volt peak analog input and after the DCX I attenuate the signal by the 20 dB resistor divider on the Buffer board. I then use the non-inverting op-amp circuit to do the EQ. The signal is then sent to the pot for volume control and then buffered by another op-amp on the Buffer board. All-in-all I have it all nearly working now. When I am done with this project I will try to put together a complete data-base with schematics for all the boards involved. Vadim |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: south
|
How does putting a resistor in parallel with each pot mean they are matched to at least 1%?
Are you only referring to the total resistance, or to tracking at all volume levels? |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DCX2496 and volume control | RogerCl | Digital Line Level | 29 | 26th September 2009 11:35 PM |
| DCX2496 DAC volume control PCB | bdipoala | Swap Meet | 16 | 6th April 2008 07:18 PM |
| Behringer DCX2496 - What Volume control? | ark | Digital Line Level | 9 | 17th September 2007 08:01 PM |
| DCX2496 Volume control | bdipoala | Swap Meet | 14 | 9th September 2007 10:57 AM |
| DCX2496 Volume Control | cOz | Digital Line Level | 4 | 25th February 2006 06:48 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |