$43000 "hi-end" DAC vs $50 consumer audio dac ? - Page 6 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th October 2012, 06:09 PM   #51
toufu is offline toufu  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco
I bought an used Weiss DAC 202 a few months ago. I am done with digital source. This will be the DAC I will die with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2012, 06:18 PM   #52
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Quote:
(it doesn't shoot lasers at kittens does it?).
I'll have you know that kittens just love having lasers shot as them. There's little that a kitty loves more than to chase a pocket LED laser spot around around a room!
__________________
Ken
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 12:47 AM   #53
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 101
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Newton View Post
As poor as the linearity reported by Bruno is, it makes me wonder to what degree msb's subjective (presumably, positive) sound character is due to their discrete converter's distortion level proportionally tracking the signal level, sort of the way open loop class-A gain stages behave. Which, of course, is opposite to the way D/A converters usually behave.
I wondered if the subjective performance is down to them having a relatively low-glitch DAC architecture. But then seeing the measurements with their high levels of higher-order distortion I rather discount that hypothesis now. Also they seem to be running the DAC 'core' at least 16X and probably 32X oversampling - inferred from the ruler-flat FR and the way the digital filters are described. Such a high degree of oversampling wouldn't be consistent with low glitch energy which is for me the no.1 USP of a NOS DAC.

My tentative conclusion for the subjective approval is that its still a multibit DAC in an S-D world, lacking the noise modulation effects of the latter hence PRaT is good despite the relatively poor distortion performance.
__________________
No matter if we meanwhile surrender every value for which we stand, we must strive to cajole the majority into imagining itself on our side - Everett Dean Martin
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 01:24 AM   #54
fas42 is offline fas42  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
fas42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NSW, Australia
Blog Entries: 11
Just to add some context to the discussion on subjective performance, and the influence of price on reviewers' opinions:

For those who haven't discovered this, Colloms's historical ratings, doesn't include the latest evaluations ... HIFICRITIC, audio review magazine, hi fi critic.

And, a post in another thread here, which quotes from a more recent issue of that magazine, one that I haven't seen ... hypex ncore

Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 04:14 AM   #55
JZatopa is offline JZatopa  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
I bought an ODAC and have been immensely satisfied with it. I am a believer of the philosophy behind it. I would love to see a direct comparison of this $43K dac vs. the ODAC.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 04:43 AM   #56
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 101
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
The ODAC is a believer's DAC, for sure
__________________
No matter if we meanwhile surrender every value for which we stand, we must strive to cajole the majority into imagining itself on our side - Everett Dean Martin
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 04:49 AM   #57
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
philosophy? isnt the whole point that it completely lacks philosophy? I find it pretty reductionist/empty myself and it completely and aggressively disregards any art.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2012, 04:55 AM   #58
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 101
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
I took it by 'philosophy' he actually meant 'ideology' - the ideology that a design can be guaranteed transparent by merely meeting or exceeding a set of numbers offered by a self proclaimed audio expert.
__________________
No matter if we meanwhile surrender every value for which we stand, we must strive to cajole the majority into imagining itself on our side - Everett Dean Martin
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The DAC "do you have experience with this dac", Best diy dac for the money? murphythecat8 Construction Tips 9 17th March 2014 07:30 AM
Schematic for Xiang Sheng Tube DAC Model "DAC-01A" wanted tiefbassuebertr Digital Line Level 9 29th September 2013 02:50 PM
Modern PC DAC vs "Audiophile DAC" TheLaw117 PC Based 140 17th September 2011 04:24 PM
Cheap "USB DAC" M-Audio Transit + Marantz CD60 lucpes Digital Source 10 11th February 2009 10:34 AM
m-audio "transit" usb 24/96 dac and digital i/o Mark Hathaway Digital Source 2 9th January 2005 05:13 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2