|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Hi all, I bought this DAC some time ago
Finished CS4398 + CS8416 USB DAC With R-core Transformer + case | eBay it performs quite well but sometimes volume control is problematic (some software allows for control, some don't) So I would like to add a stero pot to the output (unloaded output is 6.5vvpp) Will an ordinary stero log pot (1M) be adequate? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Ordinary stereo log pot is fine, but 1M is a bit high. 50k might be better.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Or even lower; I prefer 10k.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Thankyou for your answers. I will go for a 10k log pot and vheck things out but i am confident it will work perfectly
Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
is choosing a less facetious title...
diyAudio Member
|
nobody has asked what hes driving with it exactly. 100 ohms on top of whatever was the outputZ before that driving a low impedance input = bad juju. 1M was more than 'a bit high'
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
I should drive a tube amplifier with 68k grid resistor and 470k to gnd resistor.
Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2 |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
|
There are two effects of inserting a high value resistive attenuator (pot.) directly to the DAC box output. One is a permanent reduction in the maximum output signal level, although this does not alter the system frequency response. The other would be the formation of an RC low pass filter in conjunction with the shunt capacitace of the interconnect cable and that of the amplifier input stage, which will alter the system frequency response. Whether either effect is of audible consequence depends on the relative impedances involved. The higher the pot. resistance, the greater those two effects will become.
The most obvious solution to those two effects is to use a relatively low resistance pot. However, even a 10K pot. could load the DAC output stage enough to raise the distortion profile of your DAC, especially higher order distortion products. Providing a high impedance to the DAC's output stage, while providing a low impedance to the interface shunt capacitance, is the area where inductive volume controls really have an advantage in the application you describe. Bye the way, the effect of interconnect cable shunt capacitance can be eliminated by locating a resistive volume control pot. at the amplifier end of the interconnect. This would require mounting the pot. inside your amplifier chassis (in essence, changing it in to an integrated amplifier) rather than inside your DAC chassis.
__________________
Ken Last edited by Ken Newton; 11th July 2012 at 01:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Thank you all for your replies. To achieve volume control and still be able to avoid the consequences Ken Newton described I added two switches on the back of the DAC which enable me to either use the 10k log stereo pot or bypass it completely. The two switches were used to avoid loops of any kind. When both are pointing "left" the output is directly connected to the board and shares no path to the POT, if turned right (pointing the knob) the opposite happens.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
A correctly wired pot will not drop the maximum signal level by more than a trivial amount, unless the source has unusually high output impedance. Bypass switch not needed.
Ken's suggestion to put the pot at the receiving end of a long interconnect is worth following. Not necessary for a short interconnect. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adding Volume Control | palirwin | Headphone Systems | 0 | 27th February 2012 12:07 AM |
| Adding volume control to Lite DAC-AH | jaykick | Digital Source | 9 | 12th September 2007 07:32 AM |
| Adding a Volume Control(PLEASE HELP) | jodogzzz | Everything Else | 0 | 8th October 2006 11:19 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |