DSP Xover project (part 2) - Page 76 - diyAudio
 DSP Xover project (part 2)
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Luxembourg
Quote:
 Originally Posted by paalj That was an interresting lesson. Even if most of it went over my head, I think I got the basic picture.
Yes these are great DSP classes!! The professor talking there is Oppenheim himself. He co-authored with Schafer what became the Number 1 textbook on digital signal processing during many years. It's dating a bit now, but it's still absolutely relevant. There are other videos that I recommend watching if you're interested in DSP.

Coming back to your question, let's take a simple example of an analogue low-pass LR4 cutting at 10 kHz.
At 10 kHz, the filter is attenuating the input signal by 6 dB. You're OK with this, right?

Let's agree that the slope of the filter is 24 dB/oct straight after the corner frequency (it's not exactly the case, but it doesn't matter here).
This would mean that at 20 kHz, your analogue filter is attenuating the signal by 6+24 = 30 dB.
At 40 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24 = 54 dB.
At 80 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24+24 = 78 dB.
Etc.

You notice that the theoretical analogue model is not limited in frequency.

When you translate an analogue filter for the digital domain, sampling comes in with the problem that the system is limited in frequency. If you sample say at 48 kHz, then any frequency above Nyquist = 48 kHz/2 has no meaning.
With a system sampling at 48 kHz, we can't specify an attenuation by 54 dB at 40 kHz - it's just impossible.

This gives you an intuitive hint that digital realization of analogue filters are only approximations of the theoretical analogue model.
__________________
Najda DSP

 29th March 2013, 01:52 PM #752 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Luxembourg The new release is available for download at the usual place. It includes a FW update as well, so this will reset your board to the factory settings. Make sure not to pull off the USB cable or the power chord while the new FW is being transferred __________________ Najda DSP
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Quote:
 Originally Posted by chaparK Yes these are great DSP classes!! The professor talking there is Oppenheim himself. He co-authored with Schafer what became the Number 1 textbook on digital signal processing during many years. It's dating a bit now, but it's still absolutely relevant. There are other videos that I recommend watching if you're interested in DSP. Coming back to your question, let's take a simple example of an analogue low-pass LR4 cutting at 10 kHz. At 10 kHz, the filter is attenuating the input signal by 6 dB. You're OK with this, right? Let's agree that the slope of the filter is 24 dB/oct straight after the corner frequency (it's not exactly the case, but it doesn't matter here). This would mean that at 20 kHz, your analogue filter is attenuating the signal by 6+24 = 30 dB. At 40 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24 = 54 dB. At 80 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24+24 = 78 dB. Etc. You notice that the theoretical analogue model is not limited in frequency. When you translate an analogue filter for the digital domain, sampling comes in with the problem that the system is limited in frequency. If you sample say at 48 kHz, then any frequency above Nyquist = 48 kHz/2 has no meaning. With a system sampling at 48 kHz, we can't specify an attenuation by 54 dB at 40 kHz - it's just impossible. This gives you an intuitive hint that digital realization of analogue filters are only approximations of the theoretical analogue model.
Hi Nick,
Thanks,
So basically changing my samplerate to 96kHz solved my problems

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chaparK The new release is available for download at the usual place. It includes a FW update as well, so this will reset your board to the factory settings. Make sure not to pull off the USB cable or the power chord while the new FW is being transferred
Great!
The update went well. Can you tell a bit about the flexibility of the FIR taps?

best,
Paal

 29th March 2013, 04:28 PM #754 diyAudio Member     Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Hants/Berkshire/Surrey Yep - Update went like clockwork. Problem of no sound on about half of Setup swaps and connects / disconnects fixed. Now I can evaluate different setups much more easily. I'd better get another LED. Nice one Last edited by Speedysteve7; 29th March 2013 at 04:35 PM.
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Luxembourg
Sample rate

Quote:
 Originally Posted by paalj So basically changing my samplerate to 96kHz solved my problems
It's getting more and more appealing

Just for my understanding, doesnt the max samplerate 192kHz give the best sound quality ? Is there a reason to stay on 96 kHz (save processor resources or whatsoever)?

BR
Jean-Louis

diyAudio Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Quote:
 Originally Posted by JLOP It's getting more and more appealing Just for my understanding, doesnt the max samplerate 192kHz give the best sound quality ? Is there a reason to stay on 96 kHz (save processor resources or whatsoever)? BR Jean-Louis
Hi Jean-Louis,
My processor load is 49 and 52% so I guess it will be overload?
I will try later

best,
Paal

 29th March 2013, 06:09 PM #757 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Guanajuato, Mexico Anyone here who has the Najda care to review it on the following thread, please ? WAF Audio Najda reviews Thanks a lot
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hants/Berkshire/Surrey
Quote:
 Originally Posted by JLOP It's getting more and more appealing Just for my understanding, doesnt the max samplerate 192kHz give the best sound quality ? Is there a reason to stay on 96 kHz (save processor resources or whatsoever)? BR Jean-Louis
I preferred the sound / presentation of 96KHz. I did those tests before I applied my crossovers and some correction.
192 sounded glassy and artificial. 48 sounded rather lowfi. 96 was sweet and pretty much transparent comparing A/B to my passives.
Slightly different presentation but pleasing.

I am at 52% and 47% load currently.

Last edited by Speedysteve7; 29th March 2013 at 06:41 PM.

 29th March 2013, 06:47 PM #759 diyAudio Member   Join Date: Mar 2013 Location: Guanajuato, Mexico What filters are available on the Najda ? I can't find a manual anywhere and the site has virtually no information whatsoever. Thx
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Quote:
 Originally Posted by RickDangerous What filters are available on the Najda ? I can't find a manual anywhere and the site has virtually no information whatsoever.
Virtually any filter. You can find some info here WAF - Wroclaw Audio Force and in the rest of this thread.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht
|||||||||| DON'T PANIC ||||||||||

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are Off Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post chaparK Digital Line Level 141 3rd July 2011 10:16 AM dcathro Analog Line Level 4 9th September 2010 05:47 AM cuibono Multi-Way 211 18th May 2010 02:26 AM JinMTVT Digital Source 2 8th October 2004 06:02 AM x. onasis Multi-Way 6 22nd April 2003 07:39 PM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.