DSP Xover project (part 2) - Page 76 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th March 2013, 12:09 PM   #751
chaparK is offline chaparK  Luxembourg
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Luxembourg
Quote:
Originally Posted by paalj View Post
That was an interresting lesson. Even if most of it went over my head, I think I got the basic picture.
Yes these are great DSP classes!! The professor talking there is Oppenheim himself. He co-authored with Schafer what became the Number 1 textbook on digital signal processing during many years. It's dating a bit now, but it's still absolutely relevant. There are other videos that I recommend watching if you're interested in DSP.

Coming back to your question, let's take a simple example of an analogue low-pass LR4 cutting at 10 kHz.
At 10 kHz, the filter is attenuating the input signal by 6 dB. You're OK with this, right?

Let's agree that the slope of the filter is 24 dB/oct straight after the corner frequency (it's not exactly the case, but it doesn't matter here).
This would mean that at 20 kHz, your analogue filter is attenuating the signal by 6+24 = 30 dB.
At 40 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24 = 54 dB.
At 80 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24+24 = 78 dB.
Etc.

You notice that the theoretical analogue model is not limited in frequency.

When you translate an analogue filter for the digital domain, sampling comes in with the problem that the system is limited in frequency. If you sample say at 48 kHz, then any frequency above Nyquist = 48 kHz/2 has no meaning.
With a system sampling at 48 kHz, we can't specify an attenuation by 54 dB at 40 kHz - it's just impossible.

This gives you an intuitive hint that digital realization of analogue filters are only approximations of the theoretical analogue model.
__________________
Najda DSP
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 02:52 PM   #752
chaparK is offline chaparK  Luxembourg
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Luxembourg
The new release is available for download at the usual place.

It includes a FW update as well, so this will reset your board to the factory settings. Make sure not to pull off the USB cable or the power chord while the new FW is being transferred
__________________
Najda DSP
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 04:41 PM   #753
paalj is offline paalj  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaparK View Post
Yes these are great DSP classes!! The professor talking there is Oppenheim himself. He co-authored with Schafer what became the Number 1 textbook on digital signal processing during many years. It's dating a bit now, but it's still absolutely relevant. There are other videos that I recommend watching if you're interested in DSP.

Coming back to your question, let's take a simple example of an analogue low-pass LR4 cutting at 10 kHz.
At 10 kHz, the filter is attenuating the input signal by 6 dB. You're OK with this, right?

Let's agree that the slope of the filter is 24 dB/oct straight after the corner frequency (it's not exactly the case, but it doesn't matter here).
This would mean that at 20 kHz, your analogue filter is attenuating the signal by 6+24 = 30 dB.
At 40 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24 = 54 dB.
At 80 kHz, attenuation equals 6+24+24+24 = 78 dB.
Etc.

You notice that the theoretical analogue model is not limited in frequency.

When you translate an analogue filter for the digital domain, sampling comes in with the problem that the system is limited in frequency. If you sample say at 48 kHz, then any frequency above Nyquist = 48 kHz/2 has no meaning.
With a system sampling at 48 kHz, we can't specify an attenuation by 54 dB at 40 kHz - it's just impossible.

This gives you an intuitive hint that digital realization of analogue filters are only approximations of the theoretical analogue model.
Hi Nick,
Thanks,
So basically changing my samplerate to 96kHz solved my problems

Quote:
Originally Posted by chaparK View Post
The new release is available for download at the usual place.

It includes a FW update as well, so this will reset your board to the factory settings. Make sure not to pull off the USB cable or the power chord while the new FW is being transferred
Great!
The update went well. Can you tell a bit about the flexibility of the FIR taps?

best,
Paal
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 05:28 PM   #754
diyAudio Member
 
Speedysteve7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hants/Berkshire/Surrey
Yep - Update went like clockwork.
Problem of no sound on about half of Setup swaps and connects / disconnects fixed.

Now I can evaluate different setups much more easily.

I'd better get another LED.

Nice one

Last edited by Speedysteve7; 29th March 2013 at 05:35 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 06:21 PM   #755
JLOP is offline JLOP  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Luxembourg
Default Sample rate

Quote:
Originally Posted by paalj View Post
So basically changing my samplerate to 96kHz solved my problems
It's getting more and more appealing

Just for my understanding, doesnt the max samplerate 192kHz give the best sound quality ? Is there a reason to stay on 96 kHz (save processor resources or whatsoever)?

BR
Jean-Louis
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 06:49 PM   #756
paalj is offline paalj  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLOP View Post
It's getting more and more appealing

Just for my understanding, doesnt the max samplerate 192kHz give the best sound quality ? Is there a reason to stay on 96 kHz (save processor resources or whatsoever)?

BR
Jean-Louis
Hi Jean-Louis,
My processor load is 49 and 52% so I guess it will be overload?
I will try later

best,
Paal
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 07:09 PM   #757
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guanajuato, Mexico
Anyone here who has the Najda care to review it on the following thread, please ?
WAF Audio Najda reviews

Thanks a lot
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 07:39 PM   #758
diyAudio Member
 
Speedysteve7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hants/Berkshire/Surrey
Quote:
Originally Posted by JLOP View Post
It's getting more and more appealing

Just for my understanding, doesnt the max samplerate 192kHz give the best sound quality ? Is there a reason to stay on 96 kHz (save processor resources or whatsoever)?

BR
Jean-Louis
I preferred the sound / presentation of 96KHz. I did those tests before I applied my crossovers and some correction.
192 sounded glassy and artificial. 48 sounded rather lowfi. 96 was sweet and pretty much transparent comparing A/B to my passives.
Slightly different presentation but pleasing.

I am at 52% and 47% load currently.

Last edited by Speedysteve7; 29th March 2013 at 07:41 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 07:47 PM   #759
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guanajuato, Mexico
What filters are available on the Najda ? I can't find a manual anywhere and the site has virtually no information whatsoever.

Thx
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2013, 10:55 PM   #760
Shaun is offline Shaun  South Africa
diyAudio Member
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickDangerous View Post
What filters are available on the Najda ? I can't find a manual anywhere and the site has virtually no information whatsoever.
Virtually any filter. You can find some info here WAF - Wroclaw Audio Force and in the rest of this thread.
__________________
Shaun Onverwacht
|||||||||| DON'T PANIC ||||||||||
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DSP Xover project chaparK Digital Line Level 141 3rd July 2011 11:16 AM
Help Please for simple active Xover project dcathro Analog Line Level 4 9th September 2010 06:47 AM
Violet DSP Evolution - an Open Baffle Project cuibono Multi-Way 211 18th May 2010 03:26 AM
Software digital DSP ... Xover/filters/EQ ?? JinMTVT Digital Source 2 8th October 2004 07:02 AM
DSP card & proper xover for heathkit 859A speaker cabinet x. onasis Multi-Way 6 22nd April 2003 08:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2