AD1865 vs AD1955 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th April 2012, 08:37 PM   #1
toufu is offline toufu  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco
Default AD1865 vs AD1955

I have built an AD1865 DAC and have been happy with the sound. I am want to try a hires DAC, can anyone comment on the sound quality of AD1865 vs AD1955? Are they similiar in sound? Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2012, 09:59 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
Different animals. First is a multibit R-2R type with THD+N of -90dB, the second is "multibit sigma-delta" with THD+N of -110dB. Usually that means there are a few multibits (usually 4-10, they don't say how many here), each modulated by a sigma-delta signal.

On paper the second is definitely better and as proof... it is used in a lot of high-end devices.
Some people say that the pure multibit (like your first one) sounds "better" than a noise-shaped delta-sigma.
To me... it's a close call. I have both types and I listen mainly to a 18 bit multibit too because I think it sounds slightly better while playing CD signals.
But I didn't conduct extensive tests, when I have a hi-res format or a SACD, I am using the sigma-delta.

Last edited by SoNic_real_one; 9th April 2012 at 10:03 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2012, 11:50 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 105
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
Although I haven't tried the AD1865 I'd predict it will sound more dynamic (jump factor) in NOS than the AD1955 which clearly has noise modulation issues (examine the difference between noise at full-scale and at zero signal).
__________________
I have the advantage of having found out how hard it is to get to really know something... how easy it is to make mistakes and fool yourself. - Richard Feynman
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 12:06 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
Did you examine those issues? Can you post measurements to show that difference?
I don't own one.

Last edited by SoNic_real_one; 10th April 2012 at 12:13 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 12:08 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 105
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
Yeah I posted it up on SNA - here's the link to my post: Mutibit vs Delta Sigma (old vs new) - StereoNET Australia - Page 4
__________________
I have the advantage of having found out how hard it is to get to really know something... how easy it is to make mistakes and fool yourself. - Richard Feynman
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 12:51 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
Ahhh come on...

Quote:
[#10171] You do not have permission to view this attachment.
From what I read there, the same faults can be found in the multibit cips too. All have a difference between THD+N and SNR, because the first one includes the second plus the THD.

Last edited by SoNic_real_one; 10th April 2012 at 12:54 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 12:56 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 105
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
Ok here are the two plots I posted there - I realize now you have to sign up to see them.

What's hidden (because these are FFTs) is any short-term changes in the noise floor. FFT is just showing us the average noise over the acquisition window, but we know that the noise out of an S-D loop is instantaneous level dependent. ESS's Sabre datasheet shows that - the noise varies with DC level.

The noise spectrum is also dependent on the signal level - notice how it slopes upward with zero signal, but ostensibly remains flat with a full-scale sinewave present. Thus we can expect the timbre of the noise to be a dynamic thing.

If you think multibit has the same issue, then post up the plots to show it.
Attached Images
File Type: png ad1955-0dB.png (35.0 KB, 514 views)
File Type: png ad1955-low.png (34.2 KB, 505 views)
__________________
I have the advantage of having found out how hard it is to get to really know something... how easy it is to make mistakes and fool yourself. - Richard Feynman
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 02:56 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
At -140..-130dB it is unlikelly to be heard. THD are at -112..115dB and they will cover any noise (the result THD+N is at -110dB).
I don't know, it doesn't make sense. Let's not hijack this topic, maybe we can make another one for this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 03:05 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 105
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoNic_real_one View Post
At -140..-130dB it is unlikelly to be heard.
You're making the common misinterpretation of an FFT. The data points represent noise voltage into a very narrow bandwidth - much narrower than the critical bands in the ear.

Quote:
THD are at -112..115dB and they will cover any noise (the result THD+N is at -110dB).
How do you know?

Quote:
Let's not hijack this topic, maybe we can make another one for this.
This is germane - the OP is asking for differences in sound between two ADI parts. I hear that the AD1955 is less dynamic and in the absence of any other reasonable hypothesis, I put it down to noise modulation. Those plots are the smoking gun. What more do you want?
__________________
I have the advantage of having found out how hard it is to get to really know something... how easy it is to make mistakes and fool yourself. - Richard Feynman
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2012, 03:10 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
Noise modulation that is not semnificative for the level of audition. Is at the level of air molecules brownian movement.
If it is a difference, it must be something else.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ebay dac with: DAC TDA1541, AD1865, AD1955, PCM63, & CS4398! sharpi31 Digital Line Level 2 10th January 2011 07:03 AM
Ad1955 Dac skybird Digital Source 3 11th August 2008 03:13 PM
AD1955 audio out and I/V matejS Digital Source 4 11th February 2008 01:14 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2