Simulating a T Filter? - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th April 2012, 08:18 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreten View Post
Hi,

RCR isn't much of a low pass filter. Assuming low source impedance and
high loading impedance its the same as an RC, the second R makes no
difference, typically the case for audio.
...
TinaTi is dead easy to use, and automatically does frequency analysis.

rgds, sreten.
You are correct; I downloaded TinaTi and within 5 minutes I have the frequency response of my filter. It seems that the second R has no effect, which surprised me but not you.

Any tips for designing a low pass filter to go between DAC and preamp? The best I can come up with so far is cascading RC filters, with 10x the resistance and 0.1x the capacitance going down the line.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 09:07 PM   #12
sreten is online now sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

I'm confused. A DAC with analogue output to a preamp should have
inbuilt reconstitution filters to prevent it outputting hf garbage.

Look at LC, LCLC, LCLCLC etc filters for a sharper cut off,
noting that they need designing for a known load impedance.

rgds, sreten.


The R in the "RC" calculation is (Zsource+Rin)||(Zload+Rout).

If you understand this you shouldn't be surprised. high Zload makes
the second parallel term and Rout irrelevant, and low Zsource means
it reduces to simply the value of Rin and the capacitor.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow

Last edited by sreten; 12th April 2012 at 09:16 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 10:51 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
The DAC in question uses WM8741. The datasheet states that it has an internal analog filter with -3dB at 474 kHz and also says "All performance measurements are done with 20kHz low pass filter. Failure to use such a filter will result in higher THD and lower SNR and Dynamic Range readings than are found in Electrical Characteristics. The low pass filter removes out of band noise; although it is not audible it may affect dynamic specification values."(http://www.wolfsonmicro.com/document.../en/WM8741.pdf

I took this to mean that there will be IMD if there is no low pass filter used on the outputs. It was my impression that most DACs operated this way and that the Akamai series was perhaps alone in not needing a low pass filter on the analog out. Page 62 of the datasheet shows an active opamp output stage that includes several RC filters but I was trying to go completely passive at first for simplicity's sake.

Unfortunately I don't perfectly understand what you mean by (Zsource+Rin)||(Zload+Rout), particularly the || part but I have just been using the 1/(2*pi*RC) to estimate -3dB for the filter. Apparently your equation somehow reduces to mine anyway. I will check out LC filters and report back but this might be stretching my expertise a bit. The load impedance should be, I believe, close to 50kohms.(A B1 with a 50k volume pot)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 11:50 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Akamai = Asahi Kasei. Always get those two confused.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2012, 12:37 AM   #15
sreten is online now sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Hi,

|| simply means in parallel, rather than writing out the more convoluted
equation for parallel, its obvious a high term with a low term in parallel
that the low term will dominate.

The reference to a 20KHz filter is the same as the bandwidth used to
measure amplifier distortion, the lower it is, the better the numbers.

The actual -3dB bandwidth varies with filter mode and here I'm getting
a feeling of specmanship rather than telling you how to use the chip.

I can't wade through the whole document trying to work out what
it is seems to me is being obfuscated, I suspect its simply contrived.

rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simulating No Baffle speakers skorpion Multi-Way 4 12th August 2010 08:04 PM
simulating a onken zottinger Full Range 9 16th July 2010 08:29 PM
Simulating the membrane arend-jan Planars & Exotics 6 27th March 2010 04:08 PM
Simulating a choke with a CCS Onvinyl Power Supplies 0 29th May 2008 01:52 PM
SMPS simulating!! Goat Everything Else 3 30th December 2007 03:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2