|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
I found out that specs (correct readed) have a lot to do with the sound. For transistors, capacitors, diodes, OpAmps...
For example a 741 has worse specs than a 5532 and it sounds worse. My jfet based OpAmp sounded and measured better than most of 70's OpAmps, but compared with the top of the line from 2010, it would suck. I did have access to lab-grade measuring equipment back then. Last edited by SoNic_real_one; 8th February 2012 at 04:53 PM. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: HK
|
Well I was doing comparisons between audio grade components and not general purpose ones. I do agree that an audio OP like the NE5532 would sound much better than the classic LM741
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
You made a "blanket" affirmation... If it was true, the specs of 741 and 5532 would have "little to do with how they sound".
Reality is different. Specs always matter. You just need to read them carefully and understand what they mean for a specific application. |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sydney
|
Quote:
Boky |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
noise: 1 nV/√Hz, 2.8 pA/√Hz distortion: −115 dBc @ 100 kHz, VOUT = 2 V p-p −3 dB bandwidth (G = +1): 230 MHz slew rate: 120 V/μs settling time: 45 ns to 0.1%; 90ns to 0.01% Now I have only to worry about the max 10V supply - that's exactly what I have now, kind of scarry close. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Prior Lake, MN
|
Hi, I tried the AD843 in my experimental Opamp Preamp. Well... I much preferred the AD8065/AD8066. There was a noticiable overlay on the audio. Hard to describe, like a noise component. The AD8065's bettered the AD843 in everyway. AD8065's have a very natural sound so I agree with those who like that part. I'll be trying out some others too. I tried the AD8066's in my Hagerman Bugle phono and they are very nice in there too. Plenty low noise. Superb dynamics. Dave
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2x Gain pure op-amp headphone amp idea | Dxvideo | Headphone Systems | 30 | 10th September 2011 02:05 AM |
| op-amp + op-amp buffer combinations | eccdbb | Chip Amps | 2 | 22nd July 2011 04:13 AM |
| Poor power output, op amp based headphone amp. | dannybeckett | Solid State | 13 | 27th September 2010 08:31 PM |
| Who has tried a current boosted op-amp (with a transistor) as a chip-amp buffer? | sardonx | Chip Amps | 18 | 19th March 2005 12:23 PM |
| New OP-AMP for Music Man HD-130 bass amp | Kevin McCready | Solid State | 0 | 7th September 2002 11:35 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09617 seconds (78.40% PHP - 21.60% MySQL) with 10 queries |