|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1201 |
|
is choosing a less facetious title...
diyAudio Member
|
the battery voltage drop is not such a big deal, I cut my A123 higher than that though, my circuit cuts at 3.15, theres not much left after that anyway, drop is pretty fast from 3.15-3, about as quick as the initial drop from 3.6-3.45vdc.
I have to say, much as I like that new LDO; it looks great and good current capability, but how about making a small flexible low noise reg that others could use in various positions? using your layout skills, which are considerable as we know, a small high performance flea type reg could be realised. basically a buffered flea type, a higher current version of Ackos regs. I have been using something like this for my clock, made from a ltc6655 reference + LCR filter feeding one of opc's SE-SE 'the wire' headphone amps which is made from LME49990 + LME49600. it needs a bipolar supply unless its an isolated load, so not at all efficient in that way, not low dropout, but copes with power up to +/-18V for even 1.2v output. Most will have a bipolar supply somewhere in the case to power it with. What you end up with is VERY low noise across a wide bandwidth and will do 250mA without a heatsink apart from the PCB at low voltages with this we are down in the nV range, not sure exactly what noise but pretty darn low, much less than 1µV with the right LCR filter, probably less than 500nV and maybe much less. ive been playing with some ideas for a layout of my own, i've been just using a separate reference circuit feeding one of the cheap SE-SE boards that had an error Owen was selling, but something small and neat will be better. |
|
|
|
#1202 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Si570 interest list:
1. bigpandahk 2. tagheuer 3. hochopeper 4. qusp (of course) 5. AR2 - definitely! 6. wktk_smile 7. hirez69 8. CeeVee - you bet! 9. number9 10. analog_sa - GB maniac 11. edbk 12. atom6422 13. misterrogers - Of Course! 14. NicMac - as usual! |
|
|
|
#1203 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Belgrade
|
1. bigpandahk
2. tagheuer 3. hochopeper 4. qusp (of course) 5. AR2 - definitely! 6. wktk_smile 7. hirez69 8. CeeVee - you bet! 9. number9 10. analog_sa - GB maniac 11. edbk 12. atom6422 13. misterrogers - Of Course! 14. NicMac - as usual! 15. Zoran
__________________
### |
|
|
|
#1204 |
|
Contributor
diyAudio Member
|
Si570 interest list:
1. bigpandahk 2. tagheuer 3. hochopeper 4. qusp (of course) 5. AR2 - definitely! 6. wktk_smile 7. hirez69 8. CeeVee - you bet! 9. number9 10. analog_sa - GB maniac 11. edbk 12. atom6422 13. misterrogers - Of Course! 14. PET-240 |
|
|
|
#1205 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Fixed it for you Drew
![]() Si570 interest list 1. bigpandahk 2. tagheuer 3. hochopeper 4. qusp (of course) 5. AR2 - definitely! 6. wktk_smile 7. hirez69 8. CeeVee - you bet! 9. number9 10. analog_sa - GB maniac 11. edbk 12. atom6422 13. misterrogers - Of Course! 14. NicMac - as usual! 15. Zoran 16. PET-240 |
|
|
|
#1206 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Sorry, was not fOllowing this for some time, I don't see any price on this, any idea? Anyway put my name in first, don't want to miss the good thing.
Si570 interest list 1. bigpandahk 2. tagheuer 3. hochopeper 4. qusp (of course) 5. AR2 - definitely! 6. wktk_smile 7. hirez69 8. CeeVee - you bet! 9. number9 10. analog_sa - GB maniac 11. edbk 12. atom6422 13. misterrogers - Of Course! 14. NicMac - as usual! 15. Zoran 16. PET-240 17. Coolhead |
|
|
|
#1207 |
|
is choosing a less facetious title...
diyAudio Member
|
no, dont know price, but given Ians modules are usually effectively charity I dont think its anything to stress about...
|
|
|
|
#1208 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
|
Wow, quite a lot of upgrades, don't know should I mail back my old board (first version) for upgrade or should get get a new one, any suggestion?
I am definitely interested in the battery control board, need to look at more post to see what is needed to do in a single shipment. Thanks you. |
|
|
|
#1209 |
|
is choosing a less facetious title...
diyAudio Member
|
the isolator is not yet available, only 10 prototypes were sent out for testing, mine arrived today and looks good! It came complete with complementary resistor networks, Ian's generosity and productivity seems limitless! the battery board is again in prototype stage and none of these are upgrades, but separate modules so there would be no point sending it back unless you want the firmware upgraded
|
|
|
|
#1210 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
What version of firmware is required for si570 board?
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| XMOS-based Asynchronous USB to I2S interface | Lorien | Digital Source | 1725 | Yesterday 08:02 PM |
| exaU2I - Multi-Channel Asynchronous USB to I2S Interface | exa065 | exaDevices | 1304 | 23rd May 2013 03:43 PM |
| DAC chip selection + I2S jitter questions | drwho9437 | Digital Line Level | 2 | 26th July 2010 12:50 PM |
| Simple FIFO to I2S CPLD, for MCU players / reclocking | KOON3876 | Digital Line Level | 21 | 19th September 2008 04:00 PM |
| asynchronous reclocking and low jitter clocks | ash_dac | Digital Source | 3 | 8th February 2005 09:22 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |