3 raindrops / dual AD1865 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th June 2011, 11:59 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Default 3 raindrops / dual AD1865

hi, a new one again. just wonder if any one done an i/v stage for this dac board: DAC AD1865, NOS 2.0 Balanced output?

there is very short thread feb2011, but not mush for me!

i put a pair of Sowter9545 with secondaries in series. without any i/v resistor it gives 1:10 ratio. when playing a -20db pink-noise i get 1.6v. did many tries whit different i/v resistor but the output decreased dramatically!problems;

1- it's too low for me. my PSAudio DL3 gives 2.8v out!
2- the sound is not so satisfyingly either!
3- no interests in tubs. found a JFET concept that seems good but difficult to place it after trannys! the resistors here and there are just killing!
4- any help?
now through the beauty out of the window! almost!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3RainDrops_0086.jpg (123.9 KB, 510 views)
File Type: jpg 3RainDrops_0087.jpg (56.5 KB, 484 views)
File Type: jpg Schematic DAC AD1865-20.jpg (83.4 KB, 495 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2011, 04:47 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Send a message via MSN to audiodesign Send a message via Skype™ to audiodesign
use good resistor like I/V (200ohm) and an active output stage like my schematic

Hi-Resolution System 192KHz 24bit with EMU 0404 USB

see hybrid design
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2011, 01:10 AM   #3
erin is offline erin  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: http://www.makeitpossible.com/
Raindrop hui's IV stages are not too bad, he sells HDAM, FET, and Two tube versions.
I'm sure any of them would be very acceptable for use with this kit. Why not just ask him which works best and buy one of these?

Perhaps you should not rule out the tube output stages, as I have recently tried a tube output stage, and found that it is clearer, gives better front to back depth, less grain and sibilance than any op-amp output stage I have tried before. Depending upon the value of the cathode resistor bypass capacitor, you can get a sound that is "tubey" or sound that is crisp and clear, and you would never recognize that it is a tube, just clean sound. (my preference)

I have not tried a class A mosfet output stage, so perhaps these are also as good?

Last edited by erin; 3rd July 2011 at 01:14 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2011, 07:30 AM   #4
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Hi,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosian View Post
i put a pair of Sowter9545 with secondaries in series. without any i/v resistor it gives 1:10 ratio. when playing a -20db pink-noise i get 1.6v.
First, I had a DAC using balanced AD1865 and the same Sowter transformers for direct out.

NDFG. The transformers seem unsuited. Sound sbad. The whole DAC sounded unoffensive, but zero dynamics, zero engagement, tiny soundstage.

Second, if you get 1.6V with -20dB pink noise, this is EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL, eight times as much as would normal.

I would also expect the frequency response is not flat and the sound will be very distorted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosian View Post
did many tries whit different i/v resistor but the output decreased dramatically!problems;
It should do that. It needs to do that. With the recommended I/V resistors, hookup etc and two DAC's output should be 2V from a 10K output Impedance, meaning the load must be greater than 100K and very short, very low capacitance connection cables MUST be used.

It may be better to leave the input load off and load the secondary with 10KOhm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosian View Post
1- it's too low for me. my PSAudio DL3 gives 2.8v out!
It gives 2.8V with -20dB noise?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nosian View Post
3- no interests in tubs.
found a JFET concept that seems good but difficult to place it after trannys!
the resistors here and there are just killing!
4- any help?
Any help? The way you insist on approaching it, not really.

I would suggest to convert from balanced to parallel DAC's (this improves SNR by 3dB, instead of making it 3dB worse, as balanced does) and using a simple output stage, using either tubes or J-Fets as gainstage, unless you can get a good quality transformers. Even then you will need I/V resistors.

I think you need to think this through a little more overall.

Ciao T
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2011, 08:33 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
thanks so much Thorsten and others for the posts. i had given up the hope to get any answer from people.

Quote:
Second, if you get 1.6V with -20dB pink noise, this is EXTREMELY HIGH LEVEL, eight times as much as would normal.
yes it is so! 0.33v over the chip. through the secondaries with (1:10 ratio) it gives 1.6v! believe me! is something wrong?

Quote:
It may be better to leave the input load off and load the secondary with 10KOhm.
done. 0.16v output. might be interesting to know 0.07v over the chip!

Quote:
It gives 2.8V with -20dB noise?
yse. this dac gives 2.8v out according the spec. my measuring too! works perfect through stepped attenuator to the solid state power-amp!

Quote:
I would suggest to convert from balanced to parallel DAC's (this improves SNR by 3dB, instead of making it 3dB worse, as balanced does) and using a simple output stage, using either tubes or J-Fets as gainstage, unless you can get a good quality transformers. Even then you will need I/V resistors.
this mod to the board is more than i can manage to do. i modified the digital input stage and some recapping according to some threads in DiyAudio.

tubs seemes very complex to me! high voltage aso! maybe in a near future!

i put together a simpler version of an i/v stage called JFET_Cdout with the 10k resistor it gives the famous 1.6 volt again!!! reducing the resistor hopefully gives more output. correct?

and finally, what your suggestion for the best sounding solution in this case?

best regards
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual AD1865 balanced out DAC boudy Digital Line Level 6 31st July 2012 10:59 AM
CS8412 + filterless Non-OS dual AD1865 cathode_leak Digital Source 71 1st March 2005 12:07 AM
AD1865 where? avian Digital Source 2 5th January 2004 07:17 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2