|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
After 9 days of extensive listening sessions I can conclude that sounds a lot better CS8414+DF1704+PCM1704+D1 I/V Nelson Pass than BII+Legato in single end & balanced mode vs single end mode PCM1704+NP D1 I/V, details:
CS8414+DF1704+PCM1704 with Erno Borbely series regulators (one +5V (CS8414+DF1704 & two +-5V for PCM1704, NP D1 I/V LM317+LM337 for +-30V BII+Legato with Salas regs V1.2R for BII, Salas reg V1.0 remote sense for Legato & set of 3 Trident regs for BII I use Sony Vaio laptop like source, both share USB 2.0 HiFace with Salas 1.0 remote sense reg N.B. Erno Borbely adviced me that PCM1704 sounds better than BII, next step I will change Legato I/V for Classic Pass Labs D1 I/V with an ESS Dac designed by Owen (opc) |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
tarmac ripper
diyAudio Member
|
by all means try something different for the IV conversion and output stage: that makes a BIG difference.
I am using 8x1704 and BII with the same (tube based) IV and output buffer and I can tell you that the old BB chips still do an excellent work but the ESS chips really rocks. I am not saying I prefer 9018 as I keep on alternating the two dacs, they are just different. In a short word: the PCM1704 have more low level details while the 9018 has an explosive rhythmic and dynamics |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I own Borbely I/V with his own all fet regs for PCM1704 & that's sound faboulous, yes you are right the Sabre ESS 9018 is an excellent DAC surely only needs a better I/V (I tested with IVY & Legato), will see what's happen with Owen (opc forum member) I/V board developed from Nelson Pass to be adapted for Sabre ESS9018 chip, I think like you Sabre chip only needs a very good I/V.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I forgot to told that Legato was upgraded without lytics on the signal way used Auricaps 4.7uF MKP instead Muse BP...
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
I eagerly look forward to hear about results with owen's D1. Have one Buffalo II and looking into buidling D1 for it, if it turns out to be same level as boberly 1704.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Time to finish Owen's D1, first I will supply the D1 with LM317-337 & after depending results I will do the proper Salas regulators.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Any idea about where to get the Borbely's IV pcb these days?
__________________
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I will ask Erno & let you know.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Any impression on D1 vs. legato? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Still not, I will let you know.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NP D1 DAC clone with enhancement | spencer | Vendor's Bazaar | 207 | 26th January 2011 07:29 AM |
| NP D1 DAC clone - anyone interested ? | Thomas Giz | Swap Meet | 1 | 7th January 2010 10:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09195 seconds (76.30% PHP - 23.70% MySQL) with 10 queries |