|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#491 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Thanks, qusp. The Edcor looks very reasonably priced...
__________________
www.hifiduino.wordpress.com |
|
|
|
#492 |
|
is choosing a less facetious title...
diyAudio Member
|
no problems, edcor have a lot of models, so you might need to do some searching for something appropriate, but the spec is reasonably good overall and very good for the money.
the O-netics I know more about, windings are tightly enough matched that they will cope no problems with direct connection to the dac, no caps needed to null AVCC DC current (they wont saturate) and the gandwidth is pretty good really, much better than some. nothing on a good solid state circuit such as this (for THD etc) but there is something to be said for the simplicity of the connection something similar from Audio Note, Sowter, Lundahl, or heaven forbid the exotic Feastrex/Teramoto/Suzuki Finemet transformers will set you back MANY times more Last edited by qusp; 28th January 2013 at 06:07 PM. |
|
|
|
#493 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
I am talking $99 DAC to $99 Amp and likely a $99 full ranger :-)
__________________
www.hifiduino.wordpress.com |
|
|
|
#494 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
Are you targeting 99% perfection?
I like your concept... I would imagine with the right choices you could get a whole lot of bang for your $297. hmmm... $99 would get you a pair of Fountek FR-89 drivers. But I digress... It's OT. If you're really looking for low price, Hammond also makes some 600 ohm telecom transformers that might fit the bill. I don't know the P/N off hand, but I'll check tonight. I ordered a few to see how they would work direct coupled to the output of the NTD1, but never got around to it. Cheers, Owen |
|
|
|
#495 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Thanks for the info on Hammond.
Have a pair of Wild Burro Betsy-Ks. Just need to build the cabinets
__________________
www.hifiduino.wordpress.com |
|
|
|
#496 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Lot of discussion in just one day
![]() I will try BAL-SE converter and compare it with direct connection with one phase and report the result. Transformer will not be considered at this stage. Thanks for all the suggestion. |
|
|
|
#497 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Quote:
Powered the monstrosity up and, no big surprise, direct connection of a summing transformer won't work. It is probably easy to trim most of the dc imbalance at the operating point by applying a parallel resistor to one of the source resistors, but that isn't the problem. As the circuit heats up the imbalance covers a range of 30-40mV, probably because the fets are only matched at the o.p. I am certainly not an expert on cores but somewhere in the back of my mind there is some info that at least some of the more exotic cores do not take well to magnetization which can permanently alter them. So, any of the worthwhile transformers i can think of won't be too happy. That leaves parafeed of course, for those who like it
|
|
|
|
|
#498 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
So, as promised i did compare the SE output to a bal to SE using a Lundahl 1676 connected as 1+1:2. In both cases no preamp was used and the following non-balanced power amp had 80k input impedance. Coupling caps were 3.3uF of Clarity MR. Due to unbalanced and unstable dc at the outputs, the transformer primary was fed through a cap as well.
In short, the SE cap only coupled output sounds much better than the transformer summed output, especially at the frequency extremes. Obviously i was biased towards this outcome and in any case it only proves that this particular Lundahl transformer is not so great in this application. The I/V sounds very impressive - bass, dynamics and surprisingly - warmth. I am genuinely surprised that something powered from crappy 317/337 regs can sound so good. Btw, the regulators occasionally do not fire up on power-on - not sure if it's because of the large caps following them, or the high incoming DC voltage. Will replace them with 1085/1033 at fist opportunity. Last edited by analog_sa; 8th February 2013 at 05:49 PM. |
|
|
|
#499 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
|
|
|
|
#500 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
Hi Guys,
I've never had this issue before with the regs. Can you elaborate on the conditions under which it is happening? - What is the input DC voltage? - What is the output DC voltage? - What is the input capacitance? - What is the output capacitance? - What is the bypass capacitance? - What 317/337 brand / type are you using? Hopefully we can get to the bottom of it. Regards, Owen |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Take on the Classic Pass Labs D1 with an ESS Dac | opc | Digital Line Level | 1712 | 21st April 2013 10:34 AM |
| Pass D1V3 DAC - build thread | spzzzzkt | Pass Labs | 224 | 8th December 2012 03:40 AM |
| FS: Elektor Audioo DAC-2000 w/Pass labs D1 clone I/V | sachi | Swap Meet | 4 | 26th November 2010 04:57 PM |
| IRF610 I/V convertion from Pass Labs D1 dac - single ended | schiller | Digital Line Level | 5 | 15th October 2009 04:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |