|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TREVISO
|
DIR9001 o CS8414
Now is possible to change the receiver CS8414 with the new and better (up-grade ) DIR 90001, that have in data sheets a better performance and low jitter, that is no necessary a external clock for reduce the jitter. But the sound ?? Some of you have listen the booth , if is possible in the same DAC before with the old CS and after on up-grade with substitution with the convert board that is compatible pin to pin ? Repeat is interesting the impression and the difference of sound that you have listen. Thank for the answer is very important for understand the new possibility of built e new audiophile converter for my CDPRO-2M. Regards gipione
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Matera
|
actually i'm using the DIR9001 instad of the CS8414, sounds very big and very impressive the dac now
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pcm1702u pcm1704u df1704e cs8414 dir9001 ad1955 cs43122 sm5843 PMD100 AD1865NK AD1853 | uhcmos | Vendor's Bazaar | 26 | 17th June 2010 10:38 AM |
| Please help DIR9001 and AD1866 | Oleg Turbin | Digital Line Level | 2 | 24th March 2010 04:00 PM |
| Connecting a DIR9001 or a CS8414 to the MN6618A | gaetan8888 | Digital Line Level | 2 | 9th January 2010 10:44 PM |
| Dir9001 | abid_rehan | Digital Source | 0 | 26th January 2007 09:43 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |