|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
I'm building my first DAC based on PCM1798. I'm new to this, and I'm not very good with electronics (though I'm trying to learn). That's why I ask for your help.
I am about to assemble the I/U and adder according to datasheet using NE5532. Are there possible improvements to be made in this schematics, or is it good enough as it is? Advices or references to other good outputs for 1798 would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. PCM1798 datasheet. Subject schematics is on page 19. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
I know 5532/34 are not much appreciated, but some other people say they can sound good enough when applyed correctly. They are so cheap that I want to experiment with them.
And I have a problem with price/availability of some opamps in my region. LM4562 are avaliable, but they are more expensive than AD811/826 etc., OPA2132, OPA627 and such. It's $7, to be specific, which is not cheap here. I can get very cheap LM2904; OPA1632 and OPA2134 are also available for a reasonable price. And I still hve to resolve the problem of obtaining the "right" schematics - most suitable for the particular opamp, I mean. They say datasheet schematic has its issues, and I'm not good enough to understand it... There's a problem with the picture above, and I can't edit messages, so this is the right one: ![]() P.S. Sorry for my English, I'm doing my best to be clear, but sometimes I fail... |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
I have tried the OPA 2134 and was OK.
I have tried also OPA 1642 and that is better than the 2134... You should try it. The 22pF compensation it is not necessary for it, it is unity gain stable. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
Thanks! I'll try OPA1642 then.
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen |
||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
|
abraxalito, thanks a lot for your input on improving the circuit. I'll start building the DAC soon, and I sure will experiment a lot
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
"In developing audio devices we can always find creative non standart solutions that will ensure the best sound" (с) www.overture.org.ua |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
Sure, if the PS is so bad that will induce noise in the outputs, the PS is the point of improvement. I see here people that complain about hum, ground loops and such. Yes, OpAmps won't make a difference there.
But if we are talking about TDH+N below -60dB, the cheap, "bargain" OpAmps are the weak point. In all my mods that involved swaping OpAmps in existing DAC's, the results where noticeable - from 'wow' to just a slight change. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What do you use for a simple cheap load? | digital desire | Solid State | 30 | 30th December 2006 10:04 AM |
| The cheap simple ClassD | TroelsM | Class D | 30 | 25th October 2005 09:24 AM |
| Simple and cheap | sparkle | Solid State | 33 | 14th May 2004 05:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11892 seconds (79.39% PHP - 20.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |