|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
Is this cristal clock schematic would have a low jitter ? Do it need improvements ? Thank you Bye Gaetan |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
The colpitts would be better with a FET, and use a comparator instead of the inverter. There are ready schematics around.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
Can someone send to me the Elso's latest clock schematics (version6)? :) |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
Looking at the pdf doc, the Pierce circuit seem to be the best for a simple circuits, but this doc don't talk about jitter in crystal oscillators circuits. Thank Bye Gaetan |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
Digging a bit more in the forum I also found the LC clock, image included. Agree that comparator can be better but I have none of them and have a lot of inverter chips. I know the Kwak clock but it use a comparator. Thank Bye Gaetan |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
|
Hello
I've done a Google search, it's a bit puzzeling, some texts say that the Pierce crystal oscillators are much noisyer than the colpitts crystal oscillators, others texts say that the Pierce crystal oscillators are the better .... ?? Between the Pierce and the colpitts crystal oscillators, which one do have the lowest jitter ? Btw, I include an image of a Pierce crystal oscillators. Thank Bye Gaetan Last edited by gaetan8888; 20th May 2010 at 08:28 AM. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Felipe |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
|
In the link I attached in Post 3, the various circuits are rated for their stability and power supply rejection. There is little mention of phase noise.
Here is a couple more to consider : http://www.wenzel.com/pdffiles1/pdfs/xtalosc.pdf Library Library I always try to understand the subject first before copying anything from the net. As for oscillators, I am still in the middle of that process, since early this year. Just wish to have more (free) time. ![]() Patrick |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OCXO 16.9344MHz LOW JITTER CLOCK | szjyec | Digital Source | 23 | 11th October 2010 02:23 PM |
| low jitter clock help needed | atcgreg | Digital Line Level | 10 | 9th June 2009 07:58 AM |
| Marantz cd63 low jitter clock query | ash_dac | Digital Source | 0 | 23rd October 2005 09:26 AM |
| Another clock idea for low jitter | Bernhard | Digital Source | 7 | 29th October 2004 05:05 PM |
| Audiocom low jitter clock on ebay | David Gatti | Digital Source | 0 | 1st May 2004 07:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |