Hypex DSP module(s) - Page 8

twest820 · 4th April 2011, 04:21 AM

My conclusion was flexible, real time linear phase procssing requires time reversed IIR and processing power on the order of an audio SHARC. A DLCP type platform equipped with this would be compelling as the end user cost riser and hassle reduction from moving from the TAS3108 to something like an ADSP-21366 is lower than implementing the equivalent on a PC and much lower than the VisualDSP++ licensing cost and time needed to program the SHARC. A lower cost, complexity, and playback latency alternative is to move delay equalization offline by performing it as part of ripping. Linear phase support for streaming media is sacrificed but that's an acceptable compromise for many stereo playback applications. A DLCP or similar can then be used for forward time processing.

sergiof · 30th May 2011, 10:27 PM

i'm sorry, but somebody has to ask for news, eheheheh

Jan Willem Hypex · 10th June 2011, 07:11 AM

Unfortunately, there is nothing new to tell.
Beta-testers are using the DLCP, and we're waiting on their feedback.
Then we will update the hardware (and software) for the production version.
We don't know the release date yet.

Best Regards,
JW

back · 22nd August 2011, 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jan Willem Hypex

Unfortunately, there is nothing new to tell.
Beta-testers are using the DLCP, and we're waiting on their feedback.
Then we will update the hardware (and software) for the production version.
We don't know the release date yet.

Best Regards,
JW

can i be a beta tester too?

ds23man · 18th September 2011, 01:18 PM

Hello Hypex,

Is there any update??? It has been 3 month's now.

Regards Gerhard

Jan Willem Hypex · 19th September 2011, 02:52 PM

Unfortunately we're not working on it for the time being.

Best Regards,

Jan-Willem

ds23man · 23rd September 2011, 04:28 PM

????????????

david: The question hasn't been asked yet For audiophile-grade DSP work consider the ever-on-the-horizon DLCP board. It'll come but the amount of work on the PC software end has been underestimated.

Quote from Bruno in NCore thread

Bruno Putzeys · 23rd September 2011, 07:16 PM

What I mean by that is that we're as annoyed as the next person that it's taking so long. We'd love to flood the market with these goodies.

jcga · 23rd September 2011, 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ds23man

????????????

david: The question hasn't been asked yet For audiophile-grade DSP work consider the ever-on-the-horizon DLCP board. It'll come but the amount of work on the PC software end has been underestimated.

Quote from Bruno in NCore thread

Well, I was one of the beta tester and I would vote for some hardware revision too...

Bruno Putzeys · 24th September 2011, 10:20 AM

That's long been done.

23rd September 2011, 07:16 PM	#78
Bruno Putzeys diyAudio Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA	What I mean by that is that we're as annoyed as the next person that it's taking so long. We'd love to flood the market with these goodies. __________________ There's a time for everything, and this is not it.

24th September 2011, 10:20 AM	#80
Bruno Putzeys diyAudio Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA	That's long been done. __________________ There's a time for everything, and this is not it.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Low-cost active crossover module for Hypex UcD amps	Al Garay	Class D	1	12th December 2010 02:26 AM
Low cost dsp based crossover module	Crossoverman	Multi-Way	38	20th February 2010 11:25 AM
Wanted Hypex Power Module	rhcclark	Swap Meet	2	18th July 2008 02:32 AM
DSP module with AD-DA	Snickers-is	Parts	4	20th August 2007 05:00 PM
Hypex UcD 400 AD amplifier module for sale	mp006ltk	Swap Meet	9	15th November 2006 02:56 PM

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate Search Privacy Statement Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read


	Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving

4th April 2011, 04:21 AM	#71
twest820 diyAudio Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Orygun	My conclusion was flexible, real time linear phase procssing requires time reversed IIR and processing power on the order of an audio SHARC. A DLCP type platform equipped with this would be compelling as the end user cost riser and hassle reduction from moving from the TAS3108 to something like an ADSP-21366 is lower than implementing the equivalent on a PC and much lower than the VisualDSP++ licensing cost and time needed to program the SHARC. A lower cost, complexity, and playback latency alternative is to move delay equalization offline by performing it as part of ripping. Linear phase support for streaming media is sacrificed but that's an acceptable compromise for many stereo playback applications. A DLCP or similar can then be used for forward time processing.

30th May 2011, 10:27 PM	#72
sergiof diyAudio Member Join Date: Sep 2005	i'm sorry, but somebody has to ask for news, eheheheh

10th June 2011, 07:11 AM	#73
Jan Willem Hypex diyAudio Member Join Date: Aug 2010	Unfortunately, there is nothing new to tell. Beta-testers are using the DLCP, and we're waiting on their feedback. Then we will update the hardware (and software) for the production version. We don't know the release date yet. Best Regards, JW

18th September 2011, 01:18 PM	#75
ds23man diyAudio Member Join Date: Oct 2006	Hello Hypex, Is there any update??? It has been 3 month's now. Regards Gerhard

19th September 2011, 02:52 PM	#76
Jan Willem Hypex diyAudio Member Join Date: Aug 2010	Unfortunately we're not working on it for the time being. Best Regards, Jan-Willem

23rd September 2011, 04:28 PM	#77
ds23man diyAudio Member Join Date: Oct 2006	???????????? david: The question hasn't been asked yet For audiophile-grade DSP work consider the ever-on-the-horizon DLCP board. It'll come but the amount of work on the PC software end has been underestimated. Quote from Bruno in NCore thread