Hypex DSP module(s) - Page 37 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd December 2012, 11:36 PM   #361
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Originally Posted by twest820 View Post
So no particular analysis, got it, thanks.

The product announcement's in the December 2012 newsletter. Nothing not already available in the OpenDRC. really.
so is the TAS coefficient precision only 23 bits or not ?

here is the analysis of the sharcs capability Extended Precision Floating vs Fixed Point - Sharc | Comp.DSP | DSPRelated.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th December 2012, 01:55 AM   #362
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
TI's documentation is clear about the hardware capabilities. You'll have to ask Hypex as to the scaling details of their implementation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2012, 03:37 PM   #363
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
For the money I would have expected something more like FIR and a World Clock Input. XMOS USB chip or similar. What do I get for the much higher price compared to the Mini DSP more?
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th December 2012, 10:49 PM   #364
diyAudio Member
lduarte1973's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
that´s what i woukld like to know too
Just because i´m getting bald doesnt mean i cant like hair metal
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2012, 12:28 AM   #365
Eldam is offline Eldam  France
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: France

Don't understand little things (don't undestand anythings about digital ) and have please just two questions:

if the DLCP is a preamplifier too, where is the volume control ? On the software...on the computer which must be switched on all the time) ? (if a cd player or an individual steramer is connected via spdif). in a case of a streamer like a squeezebox duet used with spdif output: can I use the volume controle of the streamer without any loss ?

Understand that Hypex is not full "digital" like the little FDA amp of HifiMeDiy DDX320 with its little remote ant its 14 tone curves (of course I don't want here to compare these two products which are not made for the same people). But if the DLCP is made in relation to the Ncore amp first and for the others brand after, is there possibility to make shorter between the DLCPs' DACs--> OPA1632 and the "analogic" input stage of the hypex amp and its amp stage ?

Sorry for the low technic level questions, not sure to understand the different topologies about digital amplifier...

Last edited by Eldam; 29th December 2012 at 12:37 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2013, 11:01 AM   #366
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Anyone tested their DLCP yet? How is it working?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2013, 12:10 PM   #367
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
Some random clarifications.

Coefficient length is rarely an issue. Coefficient rounding only causes minor errors in the frequency response which are only noticeable when you make very high Q's at low frequencies. 28 bit coefficients are more than enough for any use sensibly related to loudspeakers. What really matters sonically is the length of the data words. Data rounding translates directly as distortion. In IIR filters you very often find yourself subtracting two nearly identical numbers and then amplifying the rest. Single precision floating point is slightly better than 24 bits fixed because at the very least the error scales with the signal level. But then again for most practical purposes 32-bit fixed is always better than single precision float - float only wins when the signal level drops below -48dB.

The data word lenth in the TAS3108 is 56 bits (48 after the point) and its accumulator is even longer. That's the main reason why I love it so. It's also got a cute microcoded architecture. You can seriously geek out writing code for this chip. I'm seriously galled that the 3108 has been relegated to "not recommended for new design" with no alternative in sight. The "alternative" given on the TI site is ridiculous. What this means is that we'll be doing a lifetime buy when they announce end of production.

The SigmaDSP chips have a similar microcoded architecture but its word length is limited to 28 bits (data and coeff), with limited support for double precision. If you want to do double precision you have to manipulate half words yourself which doubles the number of cycles needed. They're no alternative for the 3108 but their built-in converters and more flexible I/O give them their proper niche.

For those still believing that class D should be closer to digital than a linear amplifier, please read http://www.hypex.nl/docs/papers/AES120_353BP.pdf. The notion of "digital amplifiers" is nonsensical. The only thing you can conceivably eliminate between a DAC and an Ncore amp is the input buffer stage if you change the gain of the DAC's post filter. That would mean a different filter for each prospective DLCP/amp pairing, which is not economical.

As amply attested, I only believe in FIR stages as a way to approximate poles outside the unit circle targeted specifically to cancel non-minimum phase zeros that inevitably result from summing higher order LPF/HPF slopes. There simply aren't justifiable uses of FIR otherwise. Some future update of the software and firmware will support FIR approximation of noncausal IIR. You don't need a lot of DSP for that. The LS1 has a 6000 tap filter correcting the 70Hz subwoofer crossover, and it's done in a hundred cycles or so. The main question will be how to make the software intelligently trade delay memory for this use and for time alignment. We know how to do it, just not whose time to do it in.
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2013, 04:19 PM   #368
OllBoll is offline OllBoll  Sweden
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Originally Posted by Bruno Putzeys View Post
The LS1 has a 6000 tap filter correcting the 70Hz subwoofer crossover, and it's done in a hundred cycles or so. The main question will be how to make the software intelligently trade delay memory for this use and for time alignment. We know how to do it, just not whose time to do it in.
Back a while ago you stated that linear phase was overrated and that the advantage of using the FIR correctional filter in the LS1 didn't affect sound much at all. You theorized though that it would be more audible at lower frequencies.

So, now that you've designed the LS1s, did you find that this prediction was correct? Was FIR correction was more of an advantage lower down or is it hard to detect the improvement there also?

// Olle
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2013, 07:04 AM   #369
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
I've not yet AB'd. I've recently added a function to turn the phase correction on and off at will though so I should be able to do so easily now.
There's a time for everything, and this is not it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2013, 12:13 PM   #370
pos is offline pos  Europe
diyAudio Member
pos's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Paris
You should get much more audible results with the phase linearization of this 70hz crossover than the ones you got with the 1.5khz crossover, according to the majority of reports I have from users of rePhase.
(by the way Bruno, this was your LS1 white paper that gave me the motivation to write this software )
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low-cost active crossover module for Hypex UcD amps Al Garay Class D 2 2nd September 2014 07:36 PM
Low cost dsp based crossover module Crossoverman Multi-Way 38 20th February 2010 11:25 AM
Wanted Hypex Power Module rhcclark Swap Meet 2 18th July 2008 02:32 AM
DSP module with AD-DA Snickers-is Parts 4 20th August 2007 05:00 PM
Hypex UcD 400 AD amplifier module for sale mp006ltk Swap Meet 9 15th November 2006 02:56 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:22 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2