Hypex DSP module(s) - Page 32 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st December 2012, 09:13 PM   #311
jtwrace is offline jtwrace  United States
diyAudio Member
 
jtwrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NC
Oops. I lied. "Only" 3.

hypex ncore
__________________
"Science is not a democracy"- Earl Geddes, Ph.D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2012, 09:14 PM   #312
diyAudio Member
 
StigErik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Anyway, they should donate one to me!
__________________
dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles dipoles and dipoles
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2012, 09:16 PM   #313
diyAudio Member
 
lduarte1973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
Quote:
Originally Posted by lduarte1973 View Post
anyone knows if its better or worst than minidsp ?
what i meant is that minidsp got me disappointed as i said before and im very reluctant to spend twice the money minidsp costed and get disappointed again , so im seeking advice on someone with experience with the board before i head jump to this.i dont want to have to boards to sell later
__________________
Hey ! just because im getting bald doesnt mean i cant like hair metal

Last edited by lduarte1973; 21st December 2012 at 09:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2012, 09:52 PM   #314
Omholt is offline Omholt  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
It one is seriously dissapointed with the sound quality from miniDSP 4x10 Hd, I except one will be so with DLCP. Considering how transparent the 4x10 Hd is IMO, the difference will be minor. We are not talking about amps or speakers here and neither will have euphoric distortion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2012, 10:12 PM   #315
diyAudio Member
 
lduarte1973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
thanks Omholt , if the difference is minor then no point in buying the hypex board , ill still play for a while with the minidsp before selling it but i doubt i will change my opinion. i dont know if it the dacs or the eq but something makes me dislike the minidsp sound
__________________
Hey ! just because im getting bald doesnt mean i cant like hair metal
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2012, 10:18 PM   #316
Omholt is offline Omholt  Norway
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by lduarte1973 View Post
thanks Omholt , if the difference is minor then no point in buying the hypex board , ill still play for a while with the minidsp before selling it but i doubt i will change my opinion.
What are you looking for and what exactly are you dissapointed with the miniDSP?

When sources come to a certain point of quality, the differences become very very small IMO.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st December 2012, 10:23 PM   #317
diyAudio Member
 
lduarte1973's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lisbon
i dont like bass and midrange resolution , treble is ok , my stock jbl passive crossovers sound better
__________________
Hey ! just because im getting bald doesnt mean i cant like hair metal
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2012, 01:22 AM   #318
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ds23man View Post
If you apply dither you can shave of more than 8 bits with digital volumecontrol!


Ok a part list:

Dac: AK4396
Dac intergrator: NE5532
Balanced output buffers: OPA1632
DSP: TAS3108
USB audio: PCM2704C
ADC: PCM4202
SRC: SRC4382
what's with the 48KHz 16 bit USB interface ? It's so yesterdays technology.

These days one expects at least 96KHz/24 bit on a USB audio interface !!
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2012, 07:28 AM   #319
Julf is offline Julf  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Quote:
Originally Posted by lduarte1973 View Post
i dont like bass and midrange resolution , treble is ok , my stock jbl passive crossovers sound better
So individual voices or instruments are hard to resolve in the bass and midrange? Is this with all kinds of material, and at different volume levels?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2012, 07:32 AM   #320
ds23man is offline ds23man  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevor White View Post
what's with the 48KHz 16 bit USB interface ? It's so yesterdays technology.

These days one expects at least 96KHz/24 bit on a USB audio interface !!
Maybe, but it is mainly in the design for the integrated measurement system!

  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low-cost active crossover module for Hypex UcD amps Al Garay Class D 2 2nd September 2014 08:36 PM
Low cost dsp based crossover module Crossoverman Multi-Way 38 20th February 2010 12:25 PM
Wanted Hypex Power Module rhcclark Swap Meet 2 18th July 2008 03:32 AM
DSP module with AD-DA Snickers-is Parts 4 20th August 2007 06:00 PM
Hypex UcD 400 AD amplifier module for sale mp006ltk Swap Meet 9 15th November 2006 03:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:26 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2