|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
|
I'm doing some work on a Squeezebox receiver Squeezebox Receiver Modifications & this is the on-board DAC chip.
I already have this working with an external DAC (see link) connected via I2S but I also wanted to see how well the on-board DAC could perform as it can drive headphones easily. One of the most critical parts of the DAC is it's VMID pin which functions as a bias (2.5V) & Vref for the output stage. Like all vrefs, noise has to be kept to a minimum as it will directly effect the output. Now good coupling is an approach to minimising noise on this pin - the datasheet recommends 10uf cap bypassed by 0.1uf in close to the pin. It suggests that alternatively, an external 2.5V can be supplied to this VMID pin. Quote:
How can connecting an external 2.5V supply to VMID do anything? Am I missing something obvious? Edit: BTW, this DAC does sound very good when output through a transformer to block 2.5V bias (I use an external 2,5V on the other primary leg to cancel this bias - works wonderfully) Last edited by jkeny; 24th January 2010 at 07:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zagreb
|
You have to keep in mid that the diagram does not represent the actual inner workings of the DAC, just the principle. In your case, this sort of DAC has internal switched capacitor filters and charge transfer stages as well as output amps which tend to use VMID internally. Using external VMID means that this voltage reference becomes a 'hard' reference rather than just a RC filter, so performance vs frequency may be optimized.
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
|
Quote:
I know I could just go ahead and do it & see but I didn't want to kill the DAC chip so I was check with Wolfson first - as it happens I killed the Squeezebox receiver anyway - ironic isn't it? |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Datasheet | shon35us | Chip Amps | 3 | 9th March 2009 03:10 PM |
| stk442130 datasheet and problem | shon35us | Parts | 0 | 21st March 2007 02:04 AM |
| Datasheet help | Stocker | Parts | 0 | 10th March 2004 01:36 PM |
| Datasheet | Piersma | Digital Source | 3 | 29th January 2003 07:49 PM |
| Need datasheet | Michael_N | Digital Source | 5 | 21st January 2002 11:07 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07985 seconds (75.12% PHP - 24.88% MySQL) with 11 queries |