|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#3381 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
thanks Tomas |
|
|
|
|
#3382 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Emi susceptibility.
Is there a way to make the DCX less susceptible? Is it a mains input problem, or a radio signal problem? Is it a case/chassis that is not screening well enough? |
|
|
|
#3383 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: santa clara, CA
|
I suspect its some LDO stuff inside. some other products that make use of LDOs also seem to drop-out at the slightest change in power or static. my emu 0404usb sound device is like that, even when I avoid its switching wallwart and give it a linear supply, if there is any electrical faults or even a soldering iron pulsing on and off, that will cause drop-outs on the EMU. it uses a lot of LDOs inside.
I don't really understand why this happens, but a few boxes I have (some diy, some commercial) are very sensitive like this. after replacing the whole psu module on the behringer (a plan for later) I'll know for sure. its not about the case, since its a decent enough metal case and it gets grounded via the 3 prong IEC.
__________________
My Photostream:http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works/ |
|
|
|
#3384 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
LDOs operating with a smidgen of Vdiff?
|
|
|
|
#3385 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampere Finland Europe
|
Quote:
diyAudio - View Profile: jahonen |
|
|
|
|
#3386 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
thanks!
|
|
|
|
#3387 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#3388 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampere Finland Europe
|
Good point, though I guess there are reasons why 3V3 is used. Maybe it has been made it possible to regulate the power lines a little bit better. The schematics don't show it but BOM does, there is a LDO type TPS70851 3.3V/1.8V regulator on board. The ADSP-21065L anyway is a 3.3V device so it doesn't matter in fact.
|
|
|
|
#3389 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampere Finland Europe
|
Quote:
Last edited by mhelin; 13th December 2012 at 06:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3390 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tampere Finland Europe
|
Regarding the coaxial connectors, could these be soldered on the DCX2496 PCB (to the resistors and vias, maybe using epoxy or some plate with holes drilled for connectors to make it physically stronger):
1-1478966-0 - TE CONNECTIVITY / GREENPAR - SOCKET, SMA, BULKHEAD | Farnell Suomi and these put on the S/PDIF transmitter PCB: 5-1814400-1 - TE CONNECTIVITY / AMP - SOCKET, SMA, RIGHT ANGLE, 50OHM | Farnell Suomi Also how about adding the Word Clock send? Guess that would reduce jitter if the receiver DAC has the WC input. Last edited by mhelin; 13th December 2012 at 06:39 PM. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |