|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Hi,
I bought the current version of the ebay DAC kit LM-DAC3. Per previous posts, the CS8416 datasheets shows the following as recommended values. RFLT 3K CFLT 22nF CRIP 1nF The values on my board have 1K, 220nF and 10nF. How does it sound with incorrect PLL values? Per the seller, the values have been adjusted per their design. I'm trying to confirm if I should replace them with the values from the datasheet or leave as is. The sound quality of the stock DAC using coax sounds very similiar to the outputs of my analog player. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hi bengali, maybe you can refer to the AN159 from CS ^_^
__________________
calm down and enjoy your time in experiment |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Hi bbp,
that app note is not for the same chip though. I'll stick with the values on the datasheet. have yet to try it and see what happens. thanks for the suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
I check the dataeet for CS8416‘s
Extensive use of power and ground planes, ground plane fill in unused areas and surface mount decoupling capacitors are recommended. Decoupling capacitors should be mounted on the same side of the board as the CS8416 to minimize inductance effects, and all decoupling capacitors should be as close to the CS8416 as possible. Refer to AN159 for examples of proper techniques.
__________________
calm down and enjoy your time in experiment |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
thanks for looking.
It's a stock board from ebay so I'm not concerned about layout. it's just that they used certain values that are not the same as the cs8416 datasheet so I will try changing to values on the datasheet. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: P(R)L
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hampshire
|
The above table is now considered incorrect - please see attachment.
FWIW I updated the PLL components on my 24/192 chinese DAC and could detect no audible difference at all. Cheers, - John |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Again, if you use the recovery MCLK of this chip, that maybe not precision enough for your system. 200 ps is not a acceptable value today.
In my opinion, a crystal which includes low phase jitter should be added, either in the DF stage or the DAC stage.
__________________
calm down and enjoy your time in experiment |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problem with CS8416 | baglio | Digital Source | 4 | 5th October 2009 07:18 PM |
| FS: Cs8416-cs | A'af | Swap Meet | 1 | 31st March 2008 04:44 PM |
| DIR9001 Vs CS8416 | bou | Digital Source | 1 | 13th June 2007 01:26 PM |
| simple DAC with CS8416 | rosyiis | Digital Source | 3 | 1st June 2007 06:42 PM |
| Cs8416 | macsaif | Digital Source | 0 | 5th July 2005 08:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08517 seconds (84.45% PHP - 15.55% MySQL) with 11 queries |