Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
View Poll Results: Have i lost it or is it good?
You've got it totally wrong 3 25.00%
You're overlooking other important things so it'd have no effect 7 58.33%
There is cleverness in it, but you're not quite there yet 4 33.33%
All hail the messiah of audio fidelity! 6 50.00%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th September 2009, 04:20 AM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by withnail View Post
Soooo... if you get cryogenic superconducting circuit (and we all know that for some people, the money they spend on hifis could easily accomodate this!), thus eliminating thermal noise from the DAC, amplify it, and then no more need for cryocooling! Since thermal noise doesn't depend on voltage, the thermal noise on the 50v stage is still about 1 microvolt, ie 1/3 of the signal resolution!
Cryogenising a circuit could be easily and silently done with a Stirling cryocooler. What do you think, am I mad or is there a spark of genius in it somewhere?
Oh dear, so complicated. Here's an alternative: preemphasize the digital signal before it hits the DAC, since high frequency noise is more audible than LF noise, and apply de-emphasis in the amplifier feedback loop. Voila! Your perceived DAC noise is reduced a bunch of dB, and internal amplifier noise is also knocked down.

This, by the way, is not a serious suggestion, although I'd like to find out the result if anyone tries the technique. Hmmm... It could be interesting for systems with digital volume control, actually, although the extra high frequency energy would work the reconstruction filters pretty hard and you'd lose some headroom depending on how much HF energy was in the source. Oh well, something else to work on in my copious free time.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help! no power, im lost jdbrocious Tubes / Valves 31 22nd February 2008 02:33 AM
lost my Aleph L 1.2 pdf cdm99688 Pass Labs 0 9th September 2006 09:53 AM
lost my Aleph P 1.7 pdf´s W.O.L.F. Pass Labs 1 3rd May 2006 12:26 PM
Audio DACs, Instrumentation DACs. Brian Guralnick Digital Source 10 3rd November 2002 04:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Page generated in 0.08010 seconds (69.02% PHP - 30.98% MySQL) with 12 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio