|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
anyone can told me how can i built the Tube i/V stage
I find out have a srpp circuit but i think it is out of phase i want to built a same phase i/v stage using tube the maxium i/v resistor for pcm 1702 is 1k i can't find the good circuit please help |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
THX
BUT It also is out of phase I don't want to use opt or I/V TX for this output srpp is 180 degree phase shift from the input so the ciruit isn't the best circuit anyone can give me a better circuit for me? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
RIP
|
Invert the digital signal.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
anyhow, there is no such thing as absolute phase |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Well, I always believed that a sound pressure peak (like that caused by hitting a bass drum) at the recording studio should cause a sound pressure peak (as caused by the outward movement of the loudspeaker diaphragm), at least at low frequencies. The phase shift of crossovers makes this nonsense at higher frequency. Is the absolute phase detectable by the human ear or not - this is another question, but IMHO absolute phase does exist up to the loudspeaker terminal. The reference is the signal at the microphone terminal (speaking about a single omni mic). A pressure increase induces positive voltage at the hot terminal.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
SPL is independent of polarity |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Sure. Just swap the hot and GND (red and black) wires of the left speaker cable, leave the right unchanged. You'll be surprised
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
I do not deny the presence of differences in perceived sound when doing so, but please consider that one never knows if overall polarity is "correct" when connecting black to black and red to red. Polarity changes throughout many components. And then, still, many multimike recordings make a mess out of polarity so, "absolute" polarity does not exist |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
You are absolutely right, I must have misunderstood you, sorry for that. I meant absolute polarity does exist in theory, it could be realized in practice, but as you said many factors make it difficult to reach. A good example is a mixing console: nobody knows how many inverting stages are in series in the signal path.
BTW, on the recording side, is there any standard that dictates preserving absolute polarity during the recording process? I mean if the sound pressure increases in the studio (causing positive voltage at the microphone terminals), the binary word increases on the compact disc (causing positive voltage at the output of a noninverting I/V stage), or the groove goes up on the LP (causing positive voltage on the pickup terminals). |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BB 1702 DAC + transformer I/V ? | inertial | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 11th February 2009 01:46 PM |
| Help needed to find PVM 1702 | Alexiss | Digital Source | 9 | 19th August 2006 09:03 PM |
| my new diy toy. PCM 1702. | tube-lover | Digital Source | 6 | 3rd July 2006 01:17 PM |
| Four BB pcm 1702 | Stones | Swap Meet | 5 | 30th May 2005 09:31 PM |
| BB PCM 1702 vs 1704 | A 8 | Digital Source | 17 | 27th March 2003 11:22 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16593 seconds (56.50% PHP - 43.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |