Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th September 2009, 07:52 AM   #41
diyAudio Member
 
soundcheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duesseldorf
Blog Entries: 1

Unfortunately you won't get around the 12Mbit limitation!
I've been in contact with AD earlier about it.

If you get along with the limitation, it can be more attractive than the Opticis or Rover.
Price wise it is obviously the winner.
__________________
::: Squeezebox Touch Toolbox 3.0 and more ::: by soundcheck
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2009, 08:09 AM   #42
diyAudio Member
 
soundcheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duesseldorf
Blog Entries: 1
Did I mention this link before. You'll get some background info.
__________________
::: Squeezebox Touch Toolbox 3.0 and more ::: by soundcheck
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2009, 05:33 PM   #43
diyAudio Member
 
eclectic2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Silicon Valley
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundcheck View Post
Unfortunately you won't get around the 12Mbit limitation!
I've been in contact with AD earlier about it.

If you get along with the limitation, it can be more attractive than the Opticis or Rover.
Price wise it is obviously the winner.
Gotcha. I was mistaken, or a bit off...

I thought there were some higher speed options, but it does look like they are not fast enough for USB high speed, and apparently they are not available in the bidirectional versions as I had thought. I bet it won't be too much longer before they can make it work.

for my review, 2 questions:
- I don't know of much 24/192kHz material. You really can't live with 24/96 and 12MBps?

- isolating the I2S signals *after* the USB controller is not acceptable? This way the analog output is still effectively isolated. (and can be done with current ADuM parts) This seems like a good solution to me? And is much like the SPI/I2C examples mentioned in some of the docs? No?
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2009, 06:07 PM   #44
diyAudio Member
 
soundcheck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Duesseldorf
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by eclectic2k View Post
Gotcha. I was mistaken, or a bit off...
- I don't know of much 24/192kHz material. You really can't live with 24/96 and 12MBps?
For sure you can.

98% of the tracks out there are 44.1/16 anyhow,

Quote:
Originally Posted by eclectic2k View Post
- isolating the I2S signals *after* the USB controller is not acceptable? This way the analog output is still effectively isolated. (and can be done with current ADuM parts) This seems like a good solution to me? And is much like the SPI/I2C examples mentioned in some of the docs? No?
I agree. I don't think it really matters at what point you decouple. You just need to do it.

I am wondering what Ayre is doing. They do optical decoupling.
__________________
::: Squeezebox Touch Toolbox 3.0 and more ::: by soundcheck
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2009, 01:13 AM   #45
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Ok, I'm back to this topic again as I have hiss on my set-up. I put a scope on the output from my USB DAC, which has a PCM1793 DAC with differential Vout through a transformer. I attached the scope leads to the secondary side of the transformer & I see about 20 to 25 uS peak-to-peak waveform at about 8mV height coming from it but ONLY when I connect the USB cable to my PC (no music playing). I can power the DAC separately from an external supply & the scope is relatively clean when it is just powered on but as soon as I connect the ground through the shield of the USB cable, I get the waveform.

I have powered the Laptop (Dell Inspiron 6000) through an ungrounded SMPS & it makes some difference but I didn't note it as it's late here & these were quick test before bed.

So it looks like a different laptop is needed or better a USB isolator like the ADUM (I know it won't do 24/192 but clean 16/44 is better than dirty 24/192)

I'll do some more tests tomorrow but first a question:
- is there not a difference between doing the de-coupling at the USB end rather than the I2S end, in that jitter could be introduced into I2S but it's immune to it on the USB side?

Last edited by jkeny; 1st October 2009 at 01:20 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2009, 01:27 AM   #46
diyAudio Member
 
maxlorenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: osorno , Chile
Hi Jkeny,
Did you try battery powered laptop to see if the pick is there?

Adum4160 evaluation board has a delay or is in backorder at Digikey...maybe a couple of months delay...
__________________
Cheapest horn speakers: https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/phot...eat=directlink
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2009, 01:45 AM   #47
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxlorenz View Post
Hi Jkeny,
Did you try battery powered laptop to see if the pick is there?

Adum4160 evaluation board has a delay or is in backorder at Digikey...maybe a couple of months delay...
Unfortunately, my laptop battery is gone & I'm reluctant to buy another one - I just might buy a new nettop instead! I'm going to find somebody with a laptop with good battery & I'll try that. The SMPS could well be the issue!

I order a $14 board + ADUM4160 from here: http://www.circuitsathome.com/store
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2009, 05:28 PM   #48
diyAudio Member
 
maxlorenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: osorno , Chile
Thanks for the link. Please report about the performance of that module.

M
__________________
Cheapest horn speakers: https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/phot...eat=directlink
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2009, 07:13 PM   #49
2A3SET is offline 2A3SET  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
Default To get rid of Hum/hiss from HDMI

By following the recommendation, now I can get HDMI connected to HTPC(using TV as monitor) at same time I am listening to the USB 1543 DAC. I used to have pretty strong hum and hiss because of the HDMI connection. After the modification, with HDMI connected, it even sounds better than before without HDMI.

Thank you!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg adum4160.jpg (237.3 KB, 215 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th December 2009, 07:56 PM   #50
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Sorry guys, I've nothing to report on the ADUM board as I haven't built it yet - it won't work with high-speed USB so I had no need!

2A3SET, what modification did you apply?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PS/Amp isolation in 1 box ? jimbo1968 Chip Amps 5 20th May 2005 08:04 PM
Mouse Pad Isolation PeterArsen Everything Else 1 23rd February 2005 05:07 PM
Isolation eeka chu Tubes / Valves 4 6th December 2004 07:53 PM
isolation pad rulezzz Solid State 0 10th January 2004 06:25 PM
about isolation rulezzz Chip Amps 1 8th January 2004 06:36 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:53 PM.

Page generated in 0.11578 seconds (81.63% PHP - 18.37% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio