Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st April 2009, 04:43 PM   #11
glt is offline glt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Those opamps have PSRR > 100 dB I think. The opamps are configured as voltage followers so whatever noise in the input will show up in the output (I think that's why there is a pi filter in front of it). Thus a clean supply at the inputs of the opamps will give you "best-bang-for buck" And this is what has been proposed to use with the "Vref" mod. There is also a circuit based on the Vref, but it is a regulator (not just a reference). This "Vref-reg" will be useful to power the clock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2009, 04:48 PM   #12
glt is offline glt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny
Diagram of PS mods points:Click the image to open in full size.

I would suggest one other hugely important mod - feed the clock with a very low noise separate 3.3V supply - I don't know if anybody has done this & can report?

I don't think you can provide power with a reference. Better provide the reference to the opamp and the opamps provide the power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2009, 05:02 PM   #13
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Glt,
As usual, be careful with these PSRR figures. The neg supply is worse than the pos & at 20kHz this is down to about -65dB - not so great after all! This can be easily bettered by discretes!

Leo, noticed significant differences with different supplies to VA!

Why the necessity for the voltage buffer? Is it just a cost cutting exercise that was on the original Sabre eval board?

Quote:
I don't think you can provide power with a reference. Better provide the reference to the opamp and the opamps provide the power.
I don't know what you mean by this 3.3V is the reference, what power are you talking about?

edit: glt, can you post the Vref regulator circuit here?
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2009, 05:11 PM   #14
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
An interesting idea was just posted on DiyHiFi by wildmonkeysects in which he surmises that MAYBE the sweet spot is to use V out & ensure your AVCC PS is
Quote:
a really, really clean, preferrably open loop Avcc. No overshoots, no close phase margins if using feedback, no cheezy ceramic caps, no deriving the reference from Vdd
And this
Quote:
internally, there is probably a sweet spot for the external load where the Sabre's thermal modulation is minimal. Not convinced it would be all I or all V. Dunno yet. Dunno the internal layout.
In other words forget about I to V conversion & try V out with a clean AVCC - what's there to lose trying this? this could be why Rolls likes the transformer IV solution so much?

Just some things to consider!
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2009, 07:22 PM   #15
glt is offline glt  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Over at the other thread, there were two designs: A "Vref" that provided a very clean 3.3 voltage reference and a Vreg based on the Vref that could be used as a regulator. The Vref was a replacement of Va at the input of the opamp. Most people experimented adding Vreg to the input of the opamp, in effect cleaning the voltage noise. You could use the Vreg design to power the analog section directly bypassing the opmap, but I don't think anyone reported doing that.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2009, 07:29 PM   #16
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
But a vref is a voltage regulator ie. if the input supply changes, the output stays fixed at 3.3V.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2009, 12:19 AM   #17
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cheltenham
Hi John,

Dan here, from the SKA forum. This is what I'm using for the Analog supply to my Buffalo:

Click the image to open in full size.

Q2 is an MPSA14 darlington. Way, way better than LM317s. This is currently feeding Greg's Mini-reg to provide a nice and clean 3.3V Vref.

The clock: a separate supply with an AD797 based reg feeding a 66MHz oscillator from Guido Tent.

I'm using a Twisted Pair DIR to convert S/PDIF to I2S. Didn't make a jot of difference to the sound, but enabled 192K to work.

Analog stage is an SKpre symmetrical discrete opamp for balanced to SE conversion. The output offset is trimmable, so no coupling caps needed. Superb.

Next up ..... bypassing the LM4562 buffer and feeding the analog supply directly from the Mini-reg. Not at all convinced this will help, but worth trying.

Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2009, 12:27 AM   #18
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Ah Dan,
I never knew your username here - I'm easy to trace between forums - I use the same username!

Nice! Does this pre-regulation into the Mini-reg improve it by much?

Is that clock supply a PFMflea?

The SKPre is just used for BAL to SE, then IV stage or what?

I'm not sure why the LM4562 buffer is there? Is it to isolate the left from right AVCC?
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2009, 12:59 AM   #19
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cheltenham
Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny

Nice! Does this pre-regulation into the Mini-reg improve it by much?
Well originally it was pre-regulated by an LM317 as per the standard Twisted Pair setup. I changed to a design similar to the above, but using a Zener diode, which was an improvement. Changing to the LT1031 - plus a couple of refinements - was a further improvement.


Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny
Is that clock supply a PFMflea?
Similar, I use a JFET current source instead of the 7812, plus a couple of other minor changes.

Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny
The SKPre is just used for BAL to SE, then IV stage or what?
Just balanced to SE - no I/V needed.

Quote:
Originally posted by jkeny
I'm not sure why the LM4562 buffer is there? Is it to isolate the left from right AVCC?
The LM4562, together with a reference, forms a regulator. But if your reference is able to supply sufficient current the opamp isn't needed. You need to bypass the 1K + 1uF low-pass filter though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2009, 01:13 AM   #20
jkeny is offline jkeny  Ireland
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
Thanks Dan,
So Buffalo operating in voltage mode output into SKpre - no I to V conversion?

Ah I understand now the role of LM4562 and understand what glt was saying! Looks like 25mA current is plenty for each channel's AVCC.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hello from Buffalo NY chris emo Introductions 1 13th July 2007 05:24 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Page generated in 0.12182 seconds (79.08% PHP - 20.92% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio