Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th February 2012, 05:35 PM   #411
gvelim is offline gvelim  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
The AD797 runs hot on U55/U56, U58/59 position however the highs are very detailed, and music sounds much better than other opamps tried, especially complex passages in classical & rock recordings.

Also running a freq sweep from 10Hz-20Khz didn't point any oscillations when measured with my oscilloscope. I recall LM49720 was also hot but cannot recall a "burned finger".

Should I infer the AD797 is stable on this circuit topology besides running hot ?

Re: bypassing, although datasheet recommends bypassing with 0.1uf + 4.7uf, would there be an issue with only the 47nf ECHU bypass cap already in place ?

Last edited by gvelim; 5th February 2012 at 05:38 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 06:24 AM   #412
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicefalo View Post
Hi Evan,

try UNREG 2 should be better option. Tell us the improvement, if any...

ciao
Hi, i am still waiting on the audio gd clock to be delivered from china! But what do you mean by Unreg 2 is that 7815 reg? I have in the mean time put nichihon es muse series in all bipolar positions, only cost 11 euro. I think this was positive for sound but subtle. Better bass and vocals and slightly better clarity. Hope the clock has some effect?

regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 06:27 AM   #413
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvelim View Post
The AD797 runs hot on U55/U56, U58/59 position however the highs are very detailed, and music sounds much better than other opamps tried, especially complex passages in classical & rock recordings.

Also running a freq sweep from 10Hz-20Khz didn't point any oscillations when measured with my oscilloscope. I recall LM49720 was also hot but cannot recall a "burned finger".

Should I infer the AD797 is stable on this circuit topology besides running hot ?

Re: bypassing, although datasheet recommends bypassing with 0.1uf + 4.7uf, would there be an issue with only the 47nf ECHU bypass cap already in place ?
Have you tried 9v power supply instead of 12 v? I bought one of ebay 9v 2.6A and runs great with dacmagic , alot cooler than before.

regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 08:09 AM   #414
gvelim is offline gvelim  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
9V AC adaptor doesn't work for me as it causes voltage drop which in turn makes my SRegs not function properly. I have ordered some clip-on TO220 heat sinks to try out. Also I'll get the bypaasing fixed as per datasheet + the feedback cap at pin 7 + 6
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 08:39 AM   #415
gvelim is offline gvelim  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by evan12 View Post
But what do you mean by Unreg 2 is that 7815 reg
UNREG2 is the output of R107.

Feeding from R5's output is a much cleaner option with less noise as long as the voltage is good for your purpose. I am feeding from R5 the DACs' SRegulator so that way I avoid overloading the analog +SReg (7815) and improving a bit on heat dissipation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 01:02 AM   #416
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
[QUOTE=gvelim;2895410]UNREG2 is the output of R107.

Feeding from R5's output is a much cleaner option with less noise as long as the voltage is good for your purpose. I am feeding from R5 the DACs' SRegulator

Nice idea, I will try it.

About AD 797 : Check their power absorption across R400, if any oscillation is suspected.

Like a guide line, sum the quiescent current ( from data sheet ) and see what you have with no signal ( 50% more or less should be ok ), then try with signal to see if you get an increased value across R400.

ciao.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 09:31 AM   #417
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvelim View Post
UNREG2 is the output of R107.

Feeding from R5's output is a much cleaner option with less noise as long as the voltage is good for your purpose. I am feeding from R5 the DACs' SRegulator so that way I avoid overloading the analog +SReg (7815) and improving a bit on heat dissipation.
thanks , unfortunately too late reading your message as my tech installed the audio g clock, used the dexa 7815 output for power and silver cable i bought cheap of ebay. First impressions are good, not night and day but a bit more detail especially on 16bit/44.1 cd rips. sound is clean. Since i changed to 9v adaptor not as much heat as before.

cheers
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2012, 10:16 PM   #418
gvelim is offline gvelim  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicefalo View Post
About AD 797 : Check their power absorption across R400, if any oscillation is suspected.
With my R400 at 68ohm I am getting 5.86Vdc which gives me around 86mA for the 4 AD797 + 2 OPA2120 + SReg current. So assuming 16mA go to the 2 OPA + SReg then it will be 17mA for each AD797.

17mA translates to 0.5W which calculates as 86C on the packaging, which resembles reality. The datasheet reads -40 to 80C as normal operating temperature, so what should I infer ?

Since the browndog adaptors are being toasted from both sides, I have put a clip-on heat sink per channel for regulating the temperature.

Otherwise music is sweet, full in midrange and better than before, even when the LM49720s were on.

Last edited by gvelim; 17th February 2012 at 10:35 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2012, 08:09 AM   #419
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
AD797 is a bad beast, looks like yours are oscillating.....
IC adaptors are very bad for stability with hight speed op-amps, no heat transfer to large cooper lines too...
The safe option is to put LM49720s back. In my opinion a couple of silmic II ( 100uf/25v ), at the output of Yours regulators, will give You sweeter HF, creamy mids and strong sub bass, like I have in my dacmagic.

ciao
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2012, 09:38 PM   #420
gvelim is offline gvelim  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
I agree browndogs could be the reason for the oscillation so I am planning to fix 2 x 1206 film caps (0.1uf + 0.47uf) per rail on the adaptor to see whether this fixes the problem.

re: Silmic II, I already have super regs installed so would they still make any difference ? also where do you buy them from ?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dacmagic Mods Blue_Max Digital Line Level 50 9th March 2009 09:15 AM
Sony CD-X33ES CD Tray not opening-help? eldarvanyar Digital Source 7 14th January 2008 05:12 PM
Help! Cracks opening in my veneer suzyj Multi-Way 7 28th December 2006 04:42 AM
Cambridge Dacmagic 1 ManUtd Digital Source 1 6th October 2003 10:17 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32 PM.

Page generated in 0.12078 seconds (79.49% PHP - 20.51% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio