Clean Master Clock distribution - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Line Level
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd April 2009, 08:36 AM   #1
UV101 is offline UV101  England
diyAudio Member
UV101's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxford
Default Clean Master Clock distribution


I have a fairly heavily modded philips CD960 (ugly version of a marantz cd94!).

I've been working on the clock area to the decoder (SAA7210) filter (SAA7220) and DAC (TDA1541).

There has been some discussion on the CD650 thread regarding the clock.

The upshot is that I now wish to distribute my Trichord master clock to 4 places.

TDA1541a pin 4
SAA7220 pin 9 (original location of master clock)
SAA7210 pin 19
/2 circuit that feeds TDA1541a pin 2

My aim is to do this as effectively as possible.

My theory is that each connection would degrade the master clock by introducing its own noise.

It is currently configured to fan out from a single location (clock output) along seperate mini coax's.

I wonder if a better way to deal with this is to use a buffer circuit?

My aim would effectivly to supply 3 x master clock and 1 x (/2) bitclock.

One final point i've made the assumption that I can't use multiple clocks as they will all need to be in sync!


When Bitstream came out, I thought, “my God, what are we going to do...?” Ken Ishiwata
GValve Pre, GFA-5500 Class A power, Audio Aero Capitole MKII, Focal and Kimber "Leave Nothing as Standard"
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd April 2009, 07:37 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
One final point i've made the assumption that I can't use multiple clocks as they will all need to be in sync!
Absolutely! That's crucial.

Beyond that, I'm not entirely sure what is best. I don't think its important to have anything other than a really clean, low jitter clock for the DAC. So, IMO the main aim is to preserve that as best as possible, which may suggest isolating from the other clocks.
Thinking about it, maybe you've achieved close to optimum with a buffer for MCLK/2 to the DAC?
Maybe a buffer to the other three would aid isolation?

I know this will be a hotly debated topic

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CD master clock ftp838 Digital Source 39 4th May 2014 04:35 PM
i2s clock/data distribution blu_line Digital Line Level 5 2nd November 2008 04:52 PM
Clock distribution in CD player Sebba Digital Source 0 3rd March 2008 09:20 PM
Jitter, Clock Distribution and Glue Logic Bricolo Digital Source 35 18th April 2007 06:13 AM
Clock distribution from TENT XO Alien8 Digital Source 5 28th July 2006 05:15 AM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01 PM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2