|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#621 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
are you not getting high dc offset?
|
|
|
|
#622 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scottish Borders - Kelso; on the famous Tweed River!
|
Quote:
Yes - at the DAC outputs, but at the speaker terminals with normal range volume set it is 6 to 8 Mv. The Pre-amp is probably blocking the somewhat higher offset at the end of the DAC. |
|
|
|
|
#623 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Be aware that Zout will be a tad on the high side when using only a 1:1 transformer out.
If we take Legarems circuit as example Zout will be 118(dacout)+1k(ser.res)+1k(ser.res)+150+150(primdc r)+150+150(secdcr)//40k(resload)=2.7kohm Without series resistors(we can probably do that as the LL1690 should be ca 1k at 2Hz and the datasheet says min 1k AC-load), Zout is just above 700ohms. To get a lower Zout with seriesresistors one could go for 2:1 and this gives us just above .9kohms with 1k and .5kohms with 220ohm series-resistors. If we skip the resistors we are down to ca 400ohms. The output will still be above 1Vrms. Another, but far more complicated, way to do it, is to feed the DAC signal without caps to a differential tube(ex. 6H30) stage loaded with a 1689/PP Lundahl connected 9 or 18:1. This way Zout will be extremely low. It will probably also sound much better than using a cathode-follower. And it is completely capacitor-free............. |
|
|
|
#624 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Hi Guys,
May I ask, which vendor are you buying from ? Theres 3 listed on ebay with CS4397 & 4398 dac & theres 1 listed at US35.00 plus Thks |
|
|
|
#625 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#626 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Scottish Borders - Kelso; on the famous Tweed River!
|
Thank you for that Lars.
|
|
|
|
#627 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
|
Quote:
Yes, I am curious also as I would like to give one these a try but would like to get the same unit of purposes of continuity when modifying. |
|
|
|
|
#628 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
These UTC A-43 transformers might be worth a try:
Ebay New UTC A-43 transformers (x16) $49!!!!! The max level is +15dB which isn't ideal, but they are very cheap so probably worth a play. I ordered a batch :-) |
|
|
|
#629 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
Ignore my last email.
The price is $49 for 1, not 16!!!!!! |
|
|
|
#630 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi. I'm new in this group. Someone I know bought a pair of Digitec transfos and told me about this thread. Since I was looking a good DAC kit or something to improve the "digital side" of my audio stuff, I read with interest several posts here...
So I began to look for LOT and found some...Jensen are too expensive (so are the new Tamura) and others are very big to fit in a "regular" space like Tamura GA80080, UTC HA-108 or old Triad. Lundhal is interesting and also Sowter: http://www.sowter.co.uk/specs/5069.htm and also: http://www.sowter.co.uk/pdf/3603.pdf with the OCC wire option: http://www.sowter.co.uk/occ.php But someone knows about that one? http://www.altrancorp.com/audio_transformers.asp?id=45 |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A.O.S - Any experience? | Keltern | Multi-Way | 16 | 26th April 2012 11:15 PM |
| my t-amp experience | Eggzy | Chip Amps | 35 | 17th December 2005 06:29 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |