|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: colorado
|
Any thoughts?
http://elecp-media.com/portal/wts/cc...kAL6SzVbNFw6Sh National's site: http://www.national.com/products/catalog.do Click on Clock and Timing |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: nan jing china
|
it sounds like a good idea,
does anyone try before?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
the phase noise plots at audio frequency offsets are worse than good quality Xtal osc
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
nice for communication systems where they start integrating the measured jitter at 12 kHz. No use for serious audio avoid them, don't spend a single second best |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Ohio
|
I didn't study the entire set of data sheets. I looked through one of them.
I think it would be hard to do what most of us would want. I would want to use a "jitter cleaner" to fix up a received SPDIF stream. Aside from the problem of the jitter below 12KHz that the other posters have noticed, the chips have registers that need to be set to tell the chip what frequency the received clock is. You will need a micro to configure the part. I think you would have to use one of the verious SPDIF receiver chips in software mode. Use one that will give you a status reading of the locked sample rate. Then you will need the micro to read the SPDIF rate from the receiver and configure the jitter cleaner part for the correct sample rate. Every time the SPDIF receiver locks, the jitter cleaner will be re-configured. The package is a 48 pin LLP, which is not DIY friendly. You will have a hard time hand-soldering this. It sounds like a lot of development to me for a questionable amount of improvment. |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
http://www.tentlabs.com/Products/DAC...DAC/index.html 30dB in jitter reduction is not questionable...... best |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
How about the MAX9485? http://www.maxim-ic.com/quick_view2.cfm/qv_pk/4421
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Ohio
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
Not, there's no free lunch, at least not for 209 euro, but you might like this one http://www.grimmaudio.com/cc1grimm.htm best |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
|
Quote:
Fundamental: 24.576 MHz RMS jitter 10 Hz-20 MHz: 0.25 ps (typ) 0.3 ps (max) Phase noise at offset: 10Hz -100dB, 100Hz -130dB, 1kHz -155dB, 10kHz - 170dB, 100kHz -175dB (typ, max 3 Hz higher) Price: $20 That's per clock for 100 quantity, about double if only 10. I was going to organize a group order on head-fi but other stuff came up (a 70 hour a week job). I'm sure other manufacturers can provide similar clocks at similar prices It's pretty clear to me that most people seem to not realize that one doesn't have to spend ludicrous sums of money to get decent audio components. Just don't spend it with the suppliers that charge a multiple of what it's worth--shop around, going outside the circle of audiophile pawn shop masters! |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 16.9344MHz LOW JITTER CLOCK KIT... | bleachershane | Digital Line Level | 146 | 4th July 2010 02:17 PM |
| low jitter clock help needed | atcgreg | Digital Line Level | 10 | 9th June 2009 07:58 AM |
| Another clock idea for low jitter | Bernhard | Digital Source | 7 | 29th October 2004 05:05 PM |
| Clock in RME AD/DA 1nS Jitter! | fmak | Digital Source | 7 | 31st May 2004 08:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12691 seconds (82.64% PHP - 17.36% MySQL) with 10 queries |