Bnc installation - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Design & Build > Construction Tips

Construction Tips Construction techniques and tips

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd November 2012, 05:07 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
john dozier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
Default Bnc installation

I am replacing some rca's with bnc's on a cd transport. Guido Tent suggest that the bncs be mounted directly to the chassis with no insulating washers. What does the board think? Thanks
__________________
Evil looms. Cowboy up. Kill it. Get Paid.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2012, 05:46 PM   #2
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Mount the same way that the RCA socket was. It depends on how the player is grounded.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2012, 09:17 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Why BNCs? What is wrong with RCAs? E
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 12:02 AM   #4
Enzo is offline Enzo  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Oh, BNCs are just lots more cooler.

When I was learning electronics and building stuff in the late 1950s post-war surplus era, I had tons of BNC cables and connectors and used them for everything. Clicking them on and off just seemed so darned industrial. NO electrical advantage, just style points.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 12:25 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
john dozier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
These are replacing rca's used as digital outputs. I do like to use 75ohm connectors in these circuits. I do not even trust Canare's "75" ohm rca. Regards
__________________
Evil looms. Cowboy up. Kill it. Get Paid.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 09:12 AM   #6
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
RCA's are terrible (c**p) and add an impedance match, not what you want for a digital signal. The return and signal should also be kept together, from transmitter to reciever, for digital signals, do not seperate the return by staring it to the PSU or some other scheme.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 11:52 AM   #7
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
You meant to say that RCA add an impedance mismatch?

Fortunately frequencies are not all that high, so the impedance discontinuity of the RCA socket may be no worse than that of the circuit pigtails connected to it. In other words, good wiring of an RCA may be better than bad wiring of a BNC.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 02:02 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
john dozier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
How long do you think pigtails can be without causing a significant impendence mismatch? Regards
__________________
Evil looms. Cowboy up. Kill it. Get Paid.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 04:35 PM   #9
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Half an inch should not do much harm, but the shorter the better.

Let's do a rough back-of-envelope calculation. Assume 16-bit data at 48kHz sampling rate. So each stereo sample has 32 bits of data, plus some overhead. I can't be bothered to look up the details, so let's just assume 40 bits per sample in total. This gives a basic data rate of 1920kbit/s. I think it uses Manchester encoding, but I can't even be bothered to look that up either. Let's assume a basic signal rate of 2MHz. You need a reasonable square wave, so let's assume at least the first 50 harmonics. This means the link has to be good to about 100MHz, which is not too difficult.

A disturbance in a transmission line will not do much harm if it is less than about wavelength/50 in size. 100MHz is 3m in free space, so we can have up to 6cm disturbance. Let's not use more than half of this allowance, so the other end can do it too. So we get 3cm.

This is a back-of-envelope calculation, so the result could easily be out by a factor of 2 either way. However, it gives a rough idea of what is needed. If you might want to use 24-bit audio at 192kHz then you may need to be more careful, and treat the whole thing as a UHF circuit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2012, 04:58 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
john dozier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
Thanks DF96. My EE was almost 50 years ago and our computer had 64k of memory. Digital is not in my engineering vocabulary-give me tubes however.... Regards
__________________
Evil looms. Cowboy up. Kill it. Get Paid.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BNC male to BNC male adapter john dozier Parts 50 23rd November 2012 07:33 AM
BNC connections... Stormrider Parts 2 22nd June 2008 07:24 PM
BNC Connectors Noak Parts 2 30th May 2006 04:18 PM
VGA to BNC/ BNC to RCA Mitch Parts 1 31st July 2002 10:48 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2