|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Construction Tips Construction techniques and tips |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
This is probably a dumb question but has anyone had any luck taking a pair of unremarkable speakers and upgrading the guts? I have the speakers from an Aiwa NSX-800 that recently decided 22 years was enough. Now, I know what you're thinking. Aiwa? This was before the company took a dive and these speakers have some decent heft to them but they produce a rather flat/lifeless sound. So I guess this is a bit of a theoretical question - is it worthwhile to try to upgrade speakers or are the bones usually not good enough to bother with?
I ask because I can't do much woodworking in my one bedroom apartment and I'd like to save as much money as possible. Here's a picture of ye olde stereoe: HIFI OLD Thanks, Henry |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Hi,
Adding internal braces wall to wall can help a lot, but cheap vented boxes hardly ever suit modern quality drivers. Having said that just adding a new front baffle to existing decent boxes and possibly revised port tuning can massively reduce the woodworking and cabinet finishing involved, old boxes cab be used intelligently. But ... whilst you can add new drivers to old boxes, just buying better good used speakers, moving the old ones on, will work out far cheaper in my experience. Used speakers can be great value. rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Flatrock Community, GA, USA
|
Quote:
Large drivers are not necessary: improving the drivers mean they start and stop faster (or for tweeters are just better.) The drawback is that you have to find drivers that fit the holes. Also, you will need additional damping material. I think for the time and effort, it would be better to buy a kit that includes everything. Assembly is apartment friendly AND you don't have to wonder if it will sound OK or spend tons of time trying to improve the sound. P That said, I used Radio Shack drivers to upgrade some Smaller Advents and it worked really well. Last edited by pski; 14th December 2011 at 11:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
I put modern drivers in a walnut old AR-4. Not worth it IMHO. Second vote to just buy better used speakers.
You may not have noticed on other threads, actually designing and build successful speakers is not trivial or cheap. DIY will not save you any money. Speaker building is a bottomless pit. Only in a basic sub can you get better performance for less money by DIY. You can't beat the economy of scale from a Paradigm, Warfdale or others even if you had an existing design. We build speakers not to save money, but because we are crazy or have different ideas. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
|
Thanks for the feedback, guys, much appreciated. The last post really hit the nail on the head, I was hoping it might be possible to build something good on the cheap by putting in a little sweat equity.
Apropos of nothing, but I supposed everyone here has had a moment like this: What's gotten me going down this road is that I recently had The Epiphany. What I'm mainly after in a system is a good clear hookup for the TV so I've been pursuing multichannel (your know, 'all the dialog is in the center channel', blah, blah, blah) for years. My own speakers are some Boston Acoustics that I'm quite satisfied with. When my new Denon 3311 blew its HDMI board (again!) and went back to the shop I borrowed my sister's 20+ year old NAD 7225 to fill in so I wouldn't be listening to just TV speakers. I didn't expect much, I certainly never expected an amp from the late 80's to stomp all over a modern home theater amp. But it did more with 2 channels than the Denon does with 5 and didn't need to be programmed. I realize now that A) to hell with multichannel, all I need for myself is a good old fashioned stereo and a kick-*** DAC and B) since I've never thought her NAD was terribly special before we must have been making criminally bad speaker decisions for her setup. Maybe I'll get lucky and someone who doesn't really know what they have will put some good speakers up on Craigslist or something. Henry |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Having built 3 pairs of speakers in the last 12 months, I can tell you that most of the cost in a normal good quality speaker is in the box and not the driver. (I know some drivers are very expensive and they would be the exception). Building a good box and making it look good takes a lot of time and labor.
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
For cabinets (if you wonder if what's in front of you is a "good quality" speaker), here's an interesting test: put your hand on top of a cabinet near the middle so you can feel it vibrate, and rap it with the knuckles of your other hand. A good, thick cabinet (the AR someone mentioned, JBL's and Infinities) will be solid, and you can barely feel the difference between knocking on the middle and on the edge where there's a vertical panel underneath. With cheap cabinets it feels like hitting a drum. A lot of "nice looking" floorstanding speakers expose how cheap they are with this test. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Flatrock Community, GA, USA
|
Quote:
This to compare to USD 600 on the first pair and USD 1599 on the second pair for the guts/etc. Making it look good is immaterial. Finishing and/or real wood means bumpkus to the sound. Though you may have a wife, density and connection is more important. Building a good box means solid construction. In my recent experience the boxes are similar to single pieces of material when it comes to vibration. By this I mean no screws are used and biscuits are plentiful. Dense MDF <63 lbs/cu ft> is also present. P P |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Flatrock Community, GA, USA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any suppliers for cheap rack-mount enclosures? | Lingwendil | Parts | 6 | 22nd April 2009 10:10 AM |
| How cheap can you get? ~$60 assembled pair w/ bamboo enclosures - offer advice. | -=Germania=- | Full Range | 79 | 8th January 2009 04:58 AM |
| New enclosures for Logitech speakers | JWFokker | Multi-Way | 7 | 21st March 2005 12:17 PM |
| Active Speakers to cannibalize ? | johninCR | Multi-Way | 14 | 7th October 2004 09:48 PM |
| Tube oscilloscope: use it, or cannibalize? | cdwitmer | Equipment & Tools | 7 | 27th April 2003 05:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14173 seconds (85.21% PHP - 14.79% MySQL) with 10 queries |