super noob question
 User Name Stay logged in? Password
 Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Search

 Construction Tips Construction techniques and tips

 Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you. Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
 7th September 2009, 12:25 PM #1 t_gaines diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2009 super noob question First, I apologize for the ridiculous question, but here goes. What is the difference between a cap with a 47 nf value compared to a cap with say .047 microf value? I am assuming you can't substitute one for the other. What would happen if you did sub one for the other? How is the output changed? Thanks, Travis
 7th September 2009, 04:47 PM #2 pjp   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: under the rainclouds This should answer your question: http://openbookproject.net//electric.../DC/DC_13.html unless you meant to ask if there is any difference in value between 47nf and 0.047uf ... there isn't.
Steerpike
diyAudio Member

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Quote:
 Originally Posted by t_gaines What is the difference between a cap with a 47 nf value compared to a cap with say .047 microf value?
Same thing. It's like saying a wall is 6 feet high, or 2 yards high.
__________________
Steerpike's Toybox

 7th September 2009, 06:41 PM #4 t_gaines diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2009 Thanks for the article. Next question then: if there is no difference, what possesses one to list 47nf vs. .047 microf on a schematic. Does it have more to do with availability? Thanks for your help.
 7th September 2009, 08:35 PM #5 peranders   Electrons are yellow and more is better! diyAudio Member     Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Göteborg, Sweden Engineers (in Europe at least) try to avoid using 0.xxx uF or writing 22000 pF We use 1-999 pF, 1-999 nF, 1-999 uF This was really a super noob question but we are here for you __________________ /Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me Group buy: SSR03 Super Regulator Power Supply. Sign up HERE 74 pcb's ordered, 74 paid. Still possible to sign up.
 7th September 2009, 11:40 PM #6 Steerpike diyAudio Member     Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Johannesburg, South Africa It has nothing to do with availability - they are the same thing, it's just a different method of writing the numbers. Same as saying do you want twelve or a dozen? On my own drawings, I prefer to use whatever notation requires fewest characters, so I'd choose to use 0u1 (i.e., 0.1uF) in place of 100n, but 10n in place of 0u01. __________________ Steerpike's Toybox Last edited by Steerpike; 7th September 2009 at 11:43 PM.
 8th September 2009, 02:50 AM #7 t_gaines diyAudio Member   Join Date: Aug 2009 Thanks! That helps a bunch. Now to just figure out what I did wrong on my circuit that prevents it from working. This is the part that is so frustrating'.
 8th September 2009, 05:20 AM #8 Enzo   diyAudio Member   Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Lansing, Michigan I have been soldering for over 55 years now, and things have evolved. Nowdays we have units for every order of magnitude. terms like nano and pico were listed in reference books, but parts were never labeled that way, nor were schematics. as was said above 47nf is just another way to say .047uf or 47000pf. and .47nf is the same as 470pf. COnvenience is part of it - having several ways to state something can be useful - but also different parts of the world tend to prefer certain conventions. And different industries have there preferences as well. If you are dealing with higher frequency circuits where lots of parts are in pf. it might be less confusing to call out all the caps in pf instead of using two terms. So a list might have 220pf, 470pf, 82pf, 100pf, and 1200pf. If all the caps are in pf but one lonesome cap was written as 1.2nf or .22nf, someone could if not paying attention misread it as another pf. 2.2pf matters in RF circuits. So 2.2nf might be seen as 2.2pf just because all the other ones were. 2200pf removes that likelihood, however small a one it might be. When I was learning, in the day of cps - cycles per second instead of Hertz - we didn't use picofarads, we used micro-micro farad. Means exactly the same thing. It was written uuf. Even earlier stuff was written mmf. Our "uf" is really the Greek letter "mu" not a "u." mu stands for micro. Long ago the "m" stood for micro. Hence uuf and mmf were the same. Nowdays we have caps of even several FARADs. 50 years ago, a whole farad was mostly just a concept. But a miili-farad would not be unreasonable to find presently. Today m means milli. But if you read a 50-60 year old schematic and see mmf and mf, it doesn;t refer to millifarads. it is just uf in disguise. In the olden days it was not unusual to see a .00047 cap in a schematic.
 8th September 2009, 05:39 AM #9 pjp   diyAudio Member     Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: under the rainclouds Another part of the puzzle is that in the old days, (before personal computers) schematics were drawn on paper and a recurring problem was guaranteeing legibility. For example, often the decimal point (being just a dot on the page) would not be noticed. That led to 2 conventions - replacing the decimal point with something else, e.g. writing 0u1 to mean 0.1uf, and omitting the unit altogether in favour of a common unit declared explicitly. e.g. "All capacitors in picofarads" would be written at the bottom of the schematic, and then they would mark a part 47000 (instead of 47nf).

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Site     Site Announcements     Forum Problems Amplifiers     Solid State     Pass Labs     Tubes / Valves     Chip Amps     Class D     Power Supplies     Headphone Systems Source & Line     Analogue Source     Analog Line Level     Digital Source     Digital Line Level     PC Based Loudspeakers     Multi-Way     Full Range     Subwoofers     Planars & Exotics Live Sound     PA Systems     Instruments and Amps Design & Build     Parts     Equipment & Tools     Construction Tips     Software Tools General Interest     Car Audio     diyAudio.com Articles     Music     Everything Else Member Areas     Introductions     The Lounge     Clubs & Events     In Memoriam The Moving Image Commercial Sector     Swap Meet     Group Buys     The diyAudio Store     Vendor Forums         Vendor's Bazaar         Sonic Craft         Apex Jr         Audio Sector         Acoustic Fun         Chipamp         DIY HiFi Supply         Elekit         Elektor         Mains Cables R Us         Parts Connexion         Planet 10 hifi         Quanghao Audio Design         Siliconray Online Electronics Store         Tubelab     Manufacturers         AKSA         Audio Poutine         Musicaltech         Aussie Amplifiers         CSS         exaDevices         Feastrex         GedLee         Head 'n' HiFi - Walter         Heatsink USA         miniDSP         SITO Audio         Twin Audio         Twisted Pear         Wild Burro Audio

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Pault Multi-Way 8 14th March 2009 01:15 AM dumbo800 Tubes / Valves 6 12th August 2008 03:43 AM p_ete2003 Digital Source 6 19th May 2004 05:51 AM

 New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 PM.