|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Shenzhen
|
if the output power is not very important, i recommend the LM4702MOS or the SAP15 version then AEM6000. if higher output power is needed, i recommend to use the 300W LME49810 modules. this modules and the 500W version have the best S/N ratio, >120dB and linearity from all of the above modules.
from the switching amplifiers, i recommend the TA3020v3c amplifier.
__________________
www.connexelectronic.com complete assembled amplifier and SMPS |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
|
Can you provide a little more info on your 500W LME49810 amp with heatsink. Can this amp operate with a load that dips down to about 2.2 ohms minimum? What are the power supply requirements? I don't see much info on the product page - it looks like the description ends abruptly. Maybe there was more you wanted to post about it?
-Charlie Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Shenzhen
|
the 500W version of the LME49810 amplifier can work with lower impedances, if the supply voltage is reduced, and the maximum output power will not exceed 700W. for 2 Ohms which is close to 2.2 Ohms, the supply voltage should be max. +-63V for the power stage and max. +-68V for the driver stage. also, the power supply should be able to provide at least 10A. i recommend this supply board: Connexelectronic or the A1000SMPS.
the amplifier can work in class A, i tried before, but, i don't recommend to use it. the output power is low, and the power dissipation is huge, and the differences in sound are not that significant to change the operation class.
__________________
www.connexelectronic.com complete assembled amplifier and SMPS |
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
Quote:
For class A operation, i would go for a lme49811, where the built-in pre drivers do not exist. Anyway, as you said, there would be no advantage. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Hi Cristi - are the power supply and power output capabilities of the SAP version of the LM4702 the same as the MOS and BPL versions, or is there a difference? Since you offer three versions of the same amplifier, it would be good to know some illustrative differences between the three before I order.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Shenzhen
|
The main difference between the modules, is the type of the ouptut transistors used, as you pointed out. i have tried all 3 possible implementation (BPL version), with normal bipolar transistors, with thermal-track transistors, (SAP15 version) and MOSFET transistors. the main advantage in using the SAP transistors instead a normal pair of bipolars is that the current bias is more precise and the THD is less dependent on the output transistors temperature, music volume or supply voltage as in a normal amplifier with bipolar transistors. the sonic performance of the SAP amplifier module is better than the BPL version, and i cosider at least as good as the MOSFET version.
__________________
www.connexelectronic.com complete assembled amplifier and SMPS |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: India
|
Thanks - I assume this means the MOSFET version has the best sonic performance, followed by the SAP version? Good to know.
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
Cristi,
can you confirm that from sonic (and engineering) point of view, MOSFET version is the one to go for ? Or is it SAP version ? I know this is nitpicking, but price differences aren't that significant, might as well go for the best. Thanks, Bratislav |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Shenzhen
|
Alhtough most of the ppls tend to say that the MOS-FET sounds better, i still believe (and i look at the measurements too) that the SAP version is on the first place then followed by the MOS-FET and after the plain Bipolar version.
__________________
www.connexelectronic.com complete assembled amplifier and SMPS |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Single-Ended Class-A Audio Amplifiers | shaan | Everything Else | 32 | 4th September 2009 02:42 AM |
| Can a Class AB PP amp be said to be operating in Class A at low signal levels? | ray_moth | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 23rd January 2009 07:52 PM |
| Thermal design for Class AB amplifiers | mbroker | Solid State | 3 | 24th September 2002 03:03 AM |
| Class A vs. IC amplifiers for PC audio | Beggar | Solid State | 15 | 26th July 2002 11:58 AM |
| non surface mount class D mono audio power amplifiers | Conor | Digital Source | 9 | 4th February 2002 08:14 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.40469 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 9 queries |