UcD400, in summary. - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th December 2006, 09:24 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
ivigueras's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default UcD400, in summary.

Yes, I know. There are some complete threads for this question, but these have so many messages that have become impossible to follow them.

I think that it would be good that somebody made a summary of the best mods of the Hypex Ucd400.

And, why not?, the same about NCD and ColdAmp.


  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2006, 09:26 AM   #2
Code is offline Code  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: leeds, uk
same thing for charlize would be nice too..
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2006, 10:27 AM   #3
diyAudio Moderator
pinkmouse's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rotherham, England
Thats why we have a Wiki.

As you find stuff copy it there, we really don't need yet another tweaking thread.
Rick: Oh Cliff / Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if / You really are a cliff / when fascists keep trying to push you over it! / Are they the lemmings / Or are you, Cliff? / Or are you Cliff?
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2006, 01:08 PM   #4
Code is offline Code  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: leeds, uk
the wiki page only includes input caps and a bit on psu upgrades, i was looking for more detail in the psu buffer caps specifically.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2006, 02:44 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
ivigueras's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
True. But in the Wiki there are not so concrete.

I am thinking in a very concrete thread with very few messages with only the most recommendable mods. Directly.

Otherways would be in the wiki: "The very best cookbook for the Hypex's mods".
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2006, 12:33 PM   #6
lucpes is offline lucpes  Romania
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Romania, EU
Send a message via Yahoo to lucpes
Here's what I did to my UcD 400 AD's:

UcD400 (AD)

1) Coupling caps. 22uf. They are between the opamps and the input modulator stage. Removing really clears up things. If you really need DC protection you can use a 2.2 uf quality cap before the input connector. With the 100k input impedance it forms a more than enough highpass filter (2-3Hz).

2) Current protection. Remove R13 (SMD on the bottom). I wouldn't encourage that as there seems to be not much of a difference. Don't blame me for your modules go poof if you accidentally short the output.

3) Low voltage caps (22uf/50V I believe). Replaced with 47uf/16V Rubycon ZA's. Tighter bass and overall clarity improved.

4) Main voltage caps (470uf/100V). Replaced with 2x680uf Panasonic FC (soldered another pair on the bottom of the boards). Result is deeper bass and more 'sparkle' in the highs.

5) Output filter capacitor. Replaced with .68uf/250V EPCOS polypropylene from Farnell. Opens up things quite a bit.

6) Bootstrap cap (220/16 I think). Replaced with 180uf/16V OSCON SEP. Low impedance is key here.

7) Power supply: dual mono, +/-60VDC, 1000VA, dual bridge, 18000uf, choke, 18000uf, 250uf/160V polyprops per rail/amp. (The 250uf polyprops are huge but they take care of most noise in the supply and seem to help provide a lot of details I was missing before). Adding chokes in the supply really makes things sound 'musical'. Wired with 12Ga teflon silver plated wire.

8) Separate supply for the front-end (+-12V). Used 2x12Vac 25VA trafos, with 4700uf 25V panasonic FC/dual rectifier/7812/7912 regs, CLC filtering with 82uf 16V Panasonic FC- common mode choke - 47uf/16V rubycon ZAs. Current draw is very low, you may use other types of regs such as TL431's. (Attached pdf from hypex for where to connect the supply)

And most important tweak for difficult loads, direct soldering of the power/output wires on the board (have screw-type main capacitors, I can remove the connectors from there), also added a thick solid copper wire on the module where the ground connections are (measured a tiny drop there during heavy bass passages with my speakers).
Attached Files
File Type: pdf ucd400aux.pdf (95.2 KB, 27455 views)
We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we would let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Nelson Pass
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2006, 04:36 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
ivigueras's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Thank you, lucpes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 04:34 PM   #8
motto is offline motto  United States
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan

Could you please post a some pictures of your modified UCD400 module?


  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 05:49 PM   #9
felixx is offline felixx  Romania
diyAudio Member
felixx's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: in center
How is the sound after tweak,comparing with a clasic AB class design?...and maybe a few words comparing with similar topology AB class.
"I'm glad I can build my own mistakes."
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd January 2007, 10:21 PM   #10
deandob is offline deandob  Australia
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
You could also save some money and purchase the standard edition of the UCD400 and swap out the OPA2143 opamp with a LM4562 op amp which is getting all the rave reviews at the moment. While you are there, you can wire a CRD across the output for biasing the output stage in class A, but you can't use the CRD pads on the UCD as the LM4562 needs the bias on the -ve supply.

I have a couple of points about using an auxillary supply, I dont think its a worthwhile tweak especially when using the LM4562 and you can save the expense of another power supply because:
- The PSRR of the LM4562 around 100db, which is excellent, especially if you use the CRD.
- The power regulator circuit used in the UCD400 is superior to the UCD180 and according to TNT audio has pretty good performance. TNT regulator articles
- As the regulator significantly drops the voltage from the main rails and the current draw of the opamp is low, variations in the main supply due to current draw from the UCD output will not impact the regulated supply.
- Use a CRD instead of a resistor to better regulate the zener diode voltage reference improves the regulation of the supply. There is a good thread on pinkfishmedia if you want to learn more.

Also, do use two 4.7uF tantalum capacitors wired to the power supply pins of the opamp, for decoupling and improved bass.

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hashimoto A-105 - summary so far jazzbo Tubes / Valves 3 24th September 2008 09:31 PM
ETF07 brief summary SY Tubes / Valves 15 8th December 2007 03:50 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2