Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th December 2007, 04:03 PM   #61
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally posted by KOON3876
So I'm thinking to add attached power supply. I added some circuits I used vely long time ago (for analog power amplifier).
LTSpice says it's ripple rejection ratio = -86dB/1kHz.
Now I'm hearing this discrete power supply, simply very nice.
Controllable from AVR, Rock Solid DC voltage, < mV noise, sound is warm and silky, but puncy.
I feel a little bit better than TacT S2150.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg p1010270s.jpg (97.9 KB, 892 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 03:15 PM   #62
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
I'm really interested in this project. I'm a TacT/Lyndorf Audio fan and have owned an M2150 in the past.

However, I don't need the multi channel feature, and I'm certain that there will be improvements to this project down the line, so I'm wondering, would it be possible to split up the PCB a bit? My request would be to put the SMD components (TAS5518) on a daughter board, so that one could do the SMD soldering only once, and put the power output components on secondary PCB, so that one can configure 2, 4 or 6 as needed? I'm mostly concerned about not having to purchase multiple chips and resoldering for each upgrade, the extra channels is not that important as I assume I can just leave out those components.

Also, do you have a few more high resolution pictures of the PCB and internals of your amplifier?

Are you certain that this amp already sounds better than a M/S2150?
__________________
-Tor
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 04:41 PM   #63
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Hi, Please see my www for high res pics.

TAS5518 requires power stage TAS5142 etc, and also they are SMD components. I can not recommend separated board for them, they requires short path for power and signal.

I feel (can not guarantee ) It sounds better than TacT I had before(photo is inside TacT S2150).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg tactinside_s.jpg (96.8 KB, 693 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 06:15 PM   #64
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Quote:
Originally posted by KOON3876
Hi, Please see my www for high res pics.

Ok, found them.

TAS5518 requires power stage TAS5142 etc, and also they are SMD components. I can not recommend separated board for them, they requires short path for power and signal.
wouldn't it be possible to separate out the parts on the lower right part of the PDB, and connect to each amplifier block using ribbon cables? Would that impair sound quality? It would make it a bit easier to swap out the power supply and amplifier blocks independently of the chip section.

One of the nice things about the DIY class-D projects is that they are mostly small and modular, allowing independent upgrades of the different parts of the project.
Attached Images
File Type: png board.png (11.0 KB, 611 views)
__________________
-Tor
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 08:16 PM   #65
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Quote:
Originally posted by iampivot

wouldn't it be possible to separate out the parts on the lower right part of the PDB, and connect to each amplifier block using ribbon cables? Would that impair sound quality? It would make it a bit easier to swap out the power supply and amplifier blocks independently of the chip section.
Hi For myself separating board is..
(1) Expensive for board building fee. each board will take setup fee.
(2) not easy to design effective board separation.
(3) hard to store in enclosure, and messy cables.
(4) "module" re-design is not so often. I re-design whole of board, or just add small board.
(5) take more board space and connectors, often expensive than TAS5518 etc. (like Chip $10, connectors and cables also $10).

so not a option.
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2008, 12:17 AM   #66
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
Ok then, any suggestion for how to do a two channel version? And is the LCD display really needed?
__________________
-Tor
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2008, 06:00 AM   #67
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Hi, pls see my answer for two channel version.
"TAS5706 simple stereo full digital amplifier"
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th November 2008, 10:05 PM   #68
bg16437 is offline bg16437  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Default tas5518 pcb

Hi,

I've been on your website, i'm interested in building the multiamp, are you willing to share PCB files ?

The amp looks good project for me, currently using an analog cx3400 to split the audio from my DAC.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TAS5706 simple full digital stereo amplifier KOON3876 Class D 53 23rd September 2008 01:04 PM
Bench Digital Multi Meter TheDriver Parts 20 23rd July 2008 11:52 PM
Modify an A/V receiver to provide multi-channel digital pre-out mhakman Digital Source 3 10th April 2007 11:12 PM
Tube Output Full digital Amplifier KOON3876 Class D 8 14th December 2006 05:54 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Page generated in 0.09924 seconds (84.50% PHP - 15.50% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio