|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
I got this idea last night of using a GDT instead of lets say a IR2010 which would spare the gate driver ICīs if the fets blow.
Now i only have IRFP460 but heres the schematic of my idea: Suggestions are welcome.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
but how would you introduce dead time?
and also, remember the switching frequencies are also modulated by low freq audio so the driver transfo might saturate...... |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
I have ran this output stage setup with other stuff and havent experienced any problems with cross conduction, but that was a SSTC and induction heater so i dunno how it will behave here.
Only one way to find out. But i am not sure on which input of the comparator the feedback should go, actually im not really a fan of self oscillating class d circuits as they tent to lock onto the rails when you push them hard. Another idea i have is no GDT but putting an optocoupler on the highside gate driver. Also that would require a deadtime circuit, but i think i have one of those laying around on the drive, that one with XOR gates and RCD circuits.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I also thought about optocouplers before but it is very hard to find ones that can switch at high enough frequencies.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Yah and they are also expensive.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
so the best options are mosfet drivers specifically designed for the purpose or the UCD concept but we already know that.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
Tekko!
If you limit output voltage to 40...60% of supply voltage, and if you modify the feedback, then theoretically it can work. Somehow... "i am not sure on which input of the comparator the feedback should go" It depends on the polarity of the transformer, but this fedback method is basically wrong. 2 correct way: - 2nd order LPF in feedback loop with 200-300 kHz cutoff freq, or - feedback from after LC, and phase compensation in feedback network. Check UcD! |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Munich
|
I was also thinking about a transformer drive for the power stage. But djQUAN's note about the low frequency modulation was exactly the reason why I skipped this idea. Already from theory the resulting number turns were unpractical.
Please note the transformer has to transfer the low frequency signal of music. Especially bass is causing issues, when driving at strong modulation, means high music signal levels. Consider up to 95% modulation, close to clipping. Consider about +/-22V peak output of your drivers... means your transformer has to handle 0.95x22V/1.41=14.8Vrms at may be 20Hz. Unsaint conditions for small signal transformers. This massive low frequency signal is existing in the gate drive signal in the same way as in the half bridge output.... If you ignore this, then at high levels you might run into trouble with poor gate signals and in worst case with killed MosFets. At low levels probably nothing bad would happen. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
Maybe this way, or something like this.
Though I'm not a big friend of gate transformers. I tried everything, but I couldn't reach low enough leakage inductance. I ordered a sample from a factory, but it was much worse then mine. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Iīll just sample a few HIP4080īs
There problem solved.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Is it possible to use the internal HIP4080 comparator for the PWM generation ?
That way only an external triangular wave generator would be needed, or a feedback cir if self oscillating.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Heres an idea:
What do you think ? Edit: Oops those connections to the left should be before the filter, not after.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Transformers require a waveform with the same volt*seconds product in both directions. Also, leakage inductance prevents a fast enough turn off.
__________________
I use to feel like the small child in The Emperor's New Clothes tale |
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
So scrap this idea too then.
Problem is i already ordered the gate drivers.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
There is no problem with the gate driver, but you should design a usable feedback.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Then trash the feedback, i hate feedback anyway.
![]() This is just a slight modification of my previous class d build.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
I take your silence as this will work perfectly without hitch.
Actually ids a modified version of my previous class d build, but instead of two comparators in the pwm, heres only one. If there are other ways of doing the HIP4080 input without adding more ICīs, tell me about it. I am thinking about skipping the external comparator and use the HIP4080īs internal one.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
Btw checking yer site pafi, 2kW pwm, yer crazy!!!
How will IRFP460 (all i have for the time beeing) stand up with a 2ohm load with lets say 50-60 volts in from the power supply? This thing is for driving a sub, so....
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Quote:
but I don't think Pafi's amp can be loaded with a lower impedance at all. that just isn't simply how physics works. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
I trust that he knows what hes doin, fokker.
That thing can do 10kW if the fets have low enuf Rds(on)
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
Tekko!
It can work with IRFP460 (somehow), but surely this is not the best choice. IRF540N is much cheaper and better (faster, easier to drive, have higher efficiency) if you have only 50-60V supply. Thanks! You are right: in this amp I used very fast FETs with Rds=0,036 ohm, Vdsmax=150 V, 2 paralelled, in full bridge. Protection takes account chip temperature, so it allows higher current for short time, this results a ~120 A peak current (I measured it with 2 ms impulses on 0,1 ohm load). In real overload-test I attached 7 pcs of 8 ohm speakers parallel (Eminence Kappa 15 Pro), and overdrived by 2-3 dB with bass signal, and protection tripped 3-4 times in 15 minutes. Temperature of heat sink stayed below 50 degrees. The reason why I call it "2kW amp" is at the time of specification I didn't have big enough stabilized power supply, and also I wanted to have significant headroom for music signal. |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
|
My problem is that i cannot buy any fets (granny says no) so i have to use what i have.
__________________
The point of life is to build atleast one audio amplifier before you die. |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
This is incredible! Should I send some? |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this a stupid idea? FR125s with 12" | Foxx510 | Multi-Way | 13 | 14th May 2007 12:30 PM |
| remote OPT, stupid idea ? | Jaap | Tubes / Valves | 17 | 30th September 2005 03:35 PM |
| Remote Power Supply: A Stupid Idea? | SRMcGee | Tubes / Valves | 22 | 29th September 2005 10:37 PM |
| A stupid idea | DcibeL | Solid State | 12 | 2nd July 2005 03:23 PM |
| ( stupid ? ) idea to reduce power consumption | Bernhard | Pass Labs | 18 | 28th April 2002 12:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.22712 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 10 queries |