|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CT
|
Just wondering how these amps work in real life. At the moment, I am simulating them to get an understanding. Anyway, during simulation with 0V input the noise floor is real flat around -120 dBV (up to around the switching freqency). But, change the input to something real, say 2khz tone, the noise floor jumps up drastically to around - 50dBV.
Is it my simulation, and maybe I am missing something, or do Class D amps behave this way in real life? Oh, at the moment, the simulation is using all ideal components and no feedback. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Disabled
|
You mentioned the test frequency, but neglected everything else like gain, power level, type of amp (self oscillating etc)
At higher power the noise floor might increase slightly, but I don't think it's any kind the sort of offender a class B amp would be. Possibly due to increased EMI, especially with a bad layout. More likely due to parasitics being worked a little harder at higher power levels, which is what a simulator might actually be showing. In reality your filter inductor /core material would play a major roll in how it changes with power levels. Either way on an extremely dynamic recording with a good D amp, you can crank the volume right up and the noise floor you end up hearing is still that of the recording itself. So that of the amp must be a good measure lower than the majority of recordings out there. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CT
|
I left out the details because I was really just looking for a real world comparison vs simulation. Since you ask:
1. not self oscillating, 400Khz triangle wave feeds comparator. 2. Open loop. No feedback until I understand this portion of the design. 3. All components are "ideal". 4. Both 1/2 bridge and full BTL topologies. Can you tell me how much of the switching noise leaks out to the speaker? This test circuit isn't optimized by any means, but with no audio input, the amplitude of the switching noise (at the speaker) is around 0.5 Vp-p. Seems high to me, but I have no point of reference. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Disabled
|
.5V pk-pk is great.
That would be the switching noise leaking out to the speaker there. It should also be at fairly low power. The speaker's impedance at that frequency is high, time constant of it is long, there's no physical way the speaker can react to it at all, anymore than you could hear it if it did. The biggest problem of that high frequency ripple is EMI from the speaker wires. If you have long speaker wires or just want to attenuate that ripple even further to help prevent EMI you can simply employ a common mode choke on the speaker outputs. Some of the older threads in this forum really cover alot of material, even if they're kind of long, worth reading, should help in your quest alot.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CT
|
.5V pp is good, eh? Well that's good to hear (so to speak)! Again, it's in simulation with ideal components.
how would a common mode choke work in a single-ended app (half bridge)? If I use an L-C filter with more poles, that should help for single ended. I will look through those posts - thanks. gene |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Account Disabled
|
Single ended still has a ground return from the speaker. So you just use the two speaker wires, power out and ground.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
|
With ideal elements you can't get -50 dB noise floor at 2/400 kHz. There must be some simulation mistake. But for a more or less proper noise floor result you must simulate it with ~100 ps time step! (And this allows only ~-120 dB noise floor with 1024 points FFT.)
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CT
|
Quote:
my time step is set at {.001/16384}, or around 62ns. which works really well for single tones. I will try 100ps, but you are going to make my 600MHz cpu work hard
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CT
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Account Disabled
|
with your usual length of speaker wire much of it will become common mode
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CS4272 noise floor problem | 2sb18 | Digital Source | 1 | 1st October 2007 08:52 PM |
| What makes an amplifier have a lower noise floor? | pjpoes | Solid State | 27 | 2nd July 2007 12:20 AM |
| Noise floor rise on heathkit W4-AMs when power supply transformers were swapped | terminatorx | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 8th October 2006 01:31 AM |
| noise floor problem | johndiy | Solid State | 12 | 31st August 2006 01:32 AM |
| HOw close does driver need to be to floor to avoid floor bounce? | Kanga | Multi-Way | 8 | 24th April 2003 06:09 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |