|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Willmar, Minnesota
|
Hi,
I was looking at the layout for the UcD700 from Hypex and it would appear the output inductor and modulator are quite the distance away from the MOSFETS.... I'm no skilled PCB designer and I know the people at Hypex know what they are doing so my question is how can they get away with it? It seems counterintuitive to have the inductor almost a full PCB length away from the MOSFETS at 700W RMS. Thanks, -=Randy Knutson Mankato MN |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
It looks like the output inductor is only about 2" away from the fets, which isn't too far considering all of the components that are packed on both sides of the pcb. You're right that the ideal layout would keep the trace carrying the switching current between the fets and inductor as short as possible, but PCB design is all about the art of compromise.
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Disabled
|
My guess would be that a 4 layer board and snubbers have something to do with the getting away of it.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
It's at least a 4 layer board. It's possible they moved up to 6 or 8 layers.
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Willmar, Minnesota
|
Do you mean to imply they are setting up some sort of transmission line between the MOSFET and inductor using a multi-layer PCB? Or that using more layers increases current carrying capability of a thin trace without significantly increasing trace inductance?
Thanks, -=Randy |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
When implemented properly, boards with more copper layers can offer better EM shielding. Of course the inner copper layers are thinner and inner traces have to be a bit wider than normal outer layer traces if they need to carry a lot of current.
I think Chris implied that they may be using a snubber to deal with the increased voltage and current spikes caused by the inductance of a longer switching trace. I don't want to put words in his mouth though
__________________
Brian |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
More board layers mean you can use an uncut gound plane for the entire current loop of the output stage. Using uncut ground planes the size of the output trace loop means that the inductance of this loop is lowered a great deal, something very difficult to achieve in only 2 layers :/
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Account Disabled
|
Thanks for explaining that. Good question, good answer.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ZV5 PS layout question | seventenths | Pass Labs | 3 | 24th May 2008 08:08 PM |
| Layout question for AK4396 Dac | Radian | Digital Source | 4 | 25th December 2007 11:20 AM |
| UCD700 Layout and Wiring | GregD | Class D | 8 | 17th October 2006 03:05 PM |
| N-channel layout question | JBL | Solid State | 3 | 10th November 2002 09:47 PM |
| Layout question for aleph | hifi | Pass Labs | 1 | 8th July 2002 06:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |