|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle USA
|
What do you think?
http://www.alab-pro.com/index.php?la...172727&Ntype=6 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seattle USA
|
Or do you think I could use these for Hypex UCD's?
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Paris
|
Sincerely, with that size, I don't see the advantage ;-)
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Disabled
|
That would take up a good chunk of the case sure, its' competitive on a cost basis. The advantage is regulation I guess.
They're meant for audio so I guess you can use them. Maybe email them and let us know what they have to say? Options are good to have. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Antwerp
|
The price is not all that bad? The layout looks funny though, and I hate the fan that's on there...
If this is regulated, does it mean you don't need caps anymore (or just small ones) between smps and the modules? Seems nice for UcD... There's bigger & smaller amps as well. The 2400 seems to have 20A in the 60/0/60 version... that's a lot of juice! |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Japan
|
Quote:
Hello all, From the looks of the picture on the website, it looks that the output LC filter uses a quite small cap. That may not be bad, however, if you add additional caps, you may end up with oscillations as the feedback loop (for the regulation) may be optimized for a certain capacitive load. To keep things stable when more caps are added, you may need to change the feedback loop. Note that each UcD module also has power supply decoupling caps on board which add to the capacitive load. Maybe someone has tried this supply as I have seen this supply mentioned in some of the other threads. Would be interesting to know what peoples experiences are. Best regards Gertjan |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Hello,
I have ordered some samples of this SMPS. And I can not recommend these in combination with our UcD modules. Thereby if you see them in real life, the PCB is really HUGE! Regards, Jan-Peter |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hungary
|
Jan-Peter!
Could you make some photo from that SMPS? From the top, from the bottom, from everywhere:-) To see the details, what topology does that SMPS use, the component placing, etcetcetc... Regards, Danko
__________________
Best regards, Danko |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Antwerp
|
Jan-Peter says no, that's no for me as well. :-)
Y |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Quote:
Regards, Jan-Peter |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ZapPulse 2,1 | Cobra2 | Swap Meet | 3 | 15th November 2011 07:59 AM |
| UCD400 or ZAPPulse? | greg filip | Class D | 235 | 7th July 2006 05:49 PM |
| SMPS for ZAPPulse | kvik | Class D | 3 | 12th July 2005 03:20 AM |
| ZapPulse 2.1 HELP!!!! | Schaef | Solid State | 7 | 15th January 2004 09:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |