Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th June 2005, 10:43 AM   #1
Pierre is offline Pierre  France
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Paris
Default first THD measurements

Hello all.

Today I have started taking THD measurements of my amplifier with a simple setup: soundcard output -> amp -> dummy load -> voltage divider followed by AES-17 filter -> soundcard input

The results are not too bad, although some tweaking is required in order to get the optimum voltage level to the soundcard for every power you measure.

So far I have only measured 1KHz tones at various power levels and with a couple of load resistors.

Supply is 500VA transformer that gives (at idle) +/-50V DC with 9900uF per rail (a little bit too low), so the maximum power at 5 ohm before clipping is around 207W.

10 ohm load:
-----------------------------------
1W -> 0.023% THD
10W -> 0.033% THD
63W -> 0.17% THD
103W -> 0.5% THD

5 ohm load:
-----------------------------------
1W -> 0.037% THD
10W -> 0.07% THD
40W -> 0.19% THD
115W -> 0.2% THD
160W -> 0.51% THD
207W -> 0.65% THD

It is clear that THD increases with power level, and that at the same power output, distortion is lower with lighter load, so I suspect from the power supply, that is very weak and causes too much ripple.
Do you have any suggestions looking at this measurements?

BTW: the lower THD value obtained with a loopback cable from output to input of soundcard is 0.01% at that frequency. Should I substract that value directly from the measurements or what?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2005, 11:05 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Slovenia
Hi,

you mentioned AES-17 filter. Did you made it yourself and if yes, cold you post a shematic diagram of it?

Best regards,

Jaka Racman
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2005, 11:19 AM   #3
Pierre is offline Pierre  France
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Paris
Yes, but now I have checked, it is not an AES-17, but an approximation made by 3 stage RC filter, described in a IRF application note.

The values are: 470 ohm - 470nF - 680 ohm - 2.2nF - 1kohm - 1nF

Previously, a 1k / 100 ohm pot adjustable voltage divider has been connected in order to have the optimum output level for the soundcard to measure correctly for variable output power levels.

Best regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2005, 11:42 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Slovenia
Hi.

although it is not real AES-17 information is still helpful and welcome. Thanks and

best regards,

Jaka Racman
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2005, 11:45 AM   #5
sovadk is offline sovadk  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
sovadk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kaspar Sinding Meyer @ DTU in Lyngby
The output (L C) filter could be responsible for the icressed distortion at higher load levels. The inductor is not vary linear at higher load levels, so this could be an explanation. Supply pumping chould also be it. You could make at test with different capasitors on the supply rails, to se if it makes any difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2005, 11:59 AM   #6
Pierre is offline Pierre  France
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Paris
NFB is taken (only) after output filter ;-)
I have not observed power supply pumping during all my tests even at higher power levels. But what I do have is quite a bit (perhaps 6 to 8Vpp at the max. power measured) of supply ripple due to not very large capacitors.

I will also play with dead-time, perhaps it is excessive. Now it is implemented by 6.8 ohm gate resistor in antiparallel with shottky, and with a 3k3 resistor in antiparallel with a 1n4148 at each IR2113's input, so they form a time constant with its input capacitance only during rising edge.

Perhaps I will lower that 3k3 resistors and see if distortion gets lower, but after that I will have to test the amp at full power for quite a while to be sure that it is still reliable! ;-)

Charles what do you think about these numbers? Are they too bad for a triangle-based amp?

Best regards,
Pierre
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2005, 06:23 AM   #7
Pierre is offline Pierre  France
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Paris
Here's a small update.
I have tried with other module and reduced the dead-time resistor, noticing a very small reduction in THD. But the output ripple is no longer a nice sine wave but has peaks, I suppose some shoot-through is occuring.

I have been able to reduce the distortion measurements with a little of care while doing the tests, but what I have noticed is that THD increases with increased input frequency. I suppose that this is because my feedback network is designed to have about 31dB loop gain at up to 2KHz, then it starts decreasing. In fact, my 100Hz figures are noticeable better than what I post before (that was at 1 KHz).

Is it better to have lower feedback gain but in a wider band? Anyway, is there any other way to reduce distortion once that I have checked that dead-time is not the culprit?

Perhaps the gate resistors are too low (6.8ohm) and they are switching too fast causing more EMI problems.

If you have any ideas, they are welcome!
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2005, 07:20 AM   #8
IVX is offline IVX  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
IVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Everywhere (Buddhist's context)
hi Pierre,
some time ago i've done THD measurement of the UcD like amp (300-1000khz switching) without any low pass filter before my old audigy..no problem up to 0.002%=audigy loopback THD. However my old subamp design (80khz) has more need for such filter, hence the internal low pass filter of the sound card quite enough for DIY THD measurement if the switching higher 300khz?
__________________
Best regards,
E1.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2005, 07:48 AM   #9
Pierre is offline Pierre  France
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Paris
I use a 3 stage RC filter just in case ;-)
I don't know if my readings are being contaminated because of not enough filtering...
My sw. freq. is around 300KHz.

Best regards,
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2005, 08:11 AM   #10
IVX is offline IVX  Russian Federation
diyAudio Member
 
IVX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Everywhere (Buddhist's context)
Oops.. just for the logic victory, and to be alike AES17, your filter must have 4,7nF instead of 470nF!
__________________
Best regards,
E1.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
XAB Measurements DarkOne Pass Labs 12 16th April 2006 10:59 PM
New T-Amp measurements Pano Class D 12 14th March 2006 11:32 AM
SW measurements Grandma´s_SUB Everything Else 9 10th January 2005 01:34 PM
anyone have measurements of TB 871? morbo Multi-Way 5 27th November 2004 03:10 AM
Some CCS measurements Jocko Homo Solid State 10 29th May 2002 12:54 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 PM.

Page generated in 0.11188 seconds (79.05% PHP - 20.95% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio