Class D and Very Low Impedance loads - Page 4 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd August 2005, 08:38 AM   #31
Pafi is offline Pafi  Hungary
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Budapest
Quote:
Originally posted by Kenshin
too big MOSFETs
Yes, they are big for 2*3W, but too small for 50W@0.1ohm. This is just a sample, these tranzies were in my drawer, parts should be replaced.

Quote:
but the power output is only a few watts.
Up to 240W, but current capability and efficiency are still too low for 0.1 ohm load.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2015, 02:02 PM   #32
diyAudio Member
 
tiefbassuebertr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
Quote:
Originally Posted by LineSource View Post
I'm excited to see so much activity and hope to see some sample schematics and Spice simulations soon.

The ribbon is 100 db/watt efficient, but at 0.1 ohms, we still need 10 amps to reach 1 watt. I design my speakers for 110 db @ 1m max SPL, as I do most of my listening below 80 db @1m, about 74db at the couch. This is the magic of high efficiency ribbon linesources, you can get goosebump audio at kid safe SPLs.

My current amp is a DIY Class-A that uses a SuperSym folded cascode topology to drive 16 Sanken 180 watt bipolar output transistors. The output stage is a bridge with 4 NPN-PNP pairs on each symmetrical side. I am currently using a +/- 7V power supply for the output stage and +/- 12V for the driver circuits.

I am looking forward to a fully digital signal path: digital outs from the DVD/CD player, going over digital cables to each speaker where there is a digital Xover with room equalization and YOUR DIGITAL AMP.
Are there any news in this matter?

Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 22nd March 2015 at 02:06 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2015, 06:37 PM   #33
bcarso is offline bcarso  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canoga Park, California
Going on ten years now! Oh well these things take time, especially when the fully digital signal path has been under fire as more marketing than real improvement. I think this was the first thread I looked at on this site lo those many years ago.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2015, 02:15 AM   #34
soongsc is offline soongsc  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
soongsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Taiwan
I think it is a nobel goal to try and keep digital music digital throughout the system. Generally it should be a lot easier to control all the interface between equipment. Although, having heard a report from a friend that even optical cables can alter the sound, the signal interface. buffering, and timing probably needs a more thorough investigation.
__________________
Hear the real thing!
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2015, 02:39 AM   #35
bcarso is offline bcarso  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canoga Park, California
Yes, it is a myth that digital transmission is perfect and immune to interference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2015, 03:12 AM   #36
diyAudio Member
 
abraxalito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 122
Send a message via MSN to abraxalito Send a message via Yahoo to abraxalito Send a message via Skype™ to abraxalito
Looks like getting low enough self-noise on the power supply for satisfying subjective dynamics is going to be the biggest challenge here. Building on Bruno's earlier calculations for the capacitor size (around 0.5F) the ESR needs to scale down too alongside the capacitance scale-up. Given a typical pair of reservoir caps might have 10-20mohms ESR the 0.5F cap should have ESR below 0.5mohm. This level of ESR is achieved with some of the larger Maxwell ultracaps however the large capacitance needed to achieve this (into 1000s of Farads) is inconvenient in terms of switch-on time.

I think using an output trafo is a more practical option.
__________________
When irony first makes itself known in a young man's life, it can be like his first experience of getting drunk - Robertson Davies
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why i always have those losses in power using lower impedance loads? destroyer X Solid State 12 5th June 2007 03:49 PM
Driving Low Impedance Loads weinstro Solid State 14 8th May 2005 09:53 PM
LM3875s & low impedance loads - your thoughts? BlackDog Chip Amps 22 19th June 2004 12:18 PM
Zen driving high impedance loads supa-roo Pass Labs 2 18th April 2003 07:23 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2