|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
I am looking into power stage topologies.
Currently there are two alternatives that I am aware of. Full H-Bridge and a Half bridge. The both seem to be as good as each other but the half bridge requires a -ve supply where as the full bridge only requires a 0 to +ve. I have also read some information relating that with a full bridge you only need half the maximum voltage to produce the same output power. This doesn't seem correct as I thought the magnitude of the voltage would be the same for each topology. If anyone can help I would be greatfull. Does anyone have proof of better quality sound from either topology. I am planning to opted for the best quality sound. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
|
Half bridge is good because you have no DC voltage on the output. Plus, you can later bridge for more output. Somewhat cheaper to build. This is what Hypex do.
H bridge is good because you only need a single supply, of a lower voltage for a given power output. Also, the balanced output stage cancels out many of the distortion products and has what some describe as a mellower sound, somewhat "tube like" but without the output transformer artifacts. It also cancels out much of what noise or ripple is on the power supply. This is what ICE Power and D2Audio use.
__________________
Dan Fraser |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Lab
|
And even though the power supply for the HALF BRIDGE solution is slightly more complicated, because of the -VE, the amplifier is still MUCH simpler to build (ca. half the part count). And much simpler to compensate.
__________________
www.newclassd.com |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
The half bridge has two transistors with one transistor tied to the + rail and one to the - rail. The speaker output (forget the filter for a moment) is the connection between the transistors and ground. Theoretically, this allows the voltage across the speaker to be as high as the + rail or as low as the - rail, with respect to ground. The full bridge has one + rail and a ground and two pairs of output transistors tied between the + rail and ground. The speaker is connected between the outputs of the transistor pairs. This allows one pair of output transistors to pull one side of the speaker to the + rail while the other output pair simultaneously pulls the other side of the speaker to ground. This allows the voltage across the speaker to be as high as the + rail, or the same voltage swing as in the half bridge scenario but with only a + supply rail. Try to find a picture of what I described, it's much easier to understand when you see what's going on. edit: Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of your question. By half the maximum voltage they probably mean only one supply rail instead of positive and negative supply rails. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
What do you actually mean by compensate ? Are you talking about the carrier suppression ? I ask because there are actually more than one things that can be/must be compensated/supressed. E.g. - supply pumping: Easier on full-bridge i.e. non existent - NFB: Easier on half-bridge - Output filtering: Easier on half-bridge Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
I don't mind the increased complexity, what I am looking for is the best sound quality.
My aim is to produce a 500WRMS plus amplifier with less than 0.1% THD+N. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
I understand exactly how both works I have built several switching h-bridges for other power applications
I was trying to find out if anybody nows which produces a better quality of sound. Has anyone done comprehensive testing of each topology using the same feedback and control loop. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Everywhere (Buddhist's context)
|
Quote:
__________________
Best regards, E1. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3 stage LIN topology - NFB tappings? | AndrewT | Solid State | 66 | 3rd January 2013 09:49 AM |
| Tetrahedron output stage topology. | Circlotron | Solid State | 25 | 3rd February 2005 10:19 AM |
| power amp driver block topology? | mlloyd1 | Solid State | 115 | 31st July 2004 06:15 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |