|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
|
I have been working on my SI in a "Bud Box" experimenter's chassis while gathering parts for my "all out" version. The nice part about this phase is that I have lots of space for trying out the various mods that are being discussed. My goal is to have an excellent amp for driving my AKG K-1000 headphones.
One suggestion that I read was to put a 5-10 ohm resistor across the outputs in order to give this amp a load that it will be happier with instead of the 120-300 ohm load that many headphones offer. I am trying this right now and the results are superb with a 5 ohm 10 watt Mills non-inductive wire-wound. For me it sounds much better with the resistor than without it. My question concerns the implications for battery life? My amp runs from a 3.4AH SLA. It seems to me that putting a resistor across the outputs will drain the battery substantially faster than having just a 4 ohm speaker. Is that correct? I am very good on building but a little short on theory and so would enjoy discussion about this. Thanks a lot, Paul |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Athens+Addis Ababa
|
Well, yes.A 4ohm load is going to eat up more current than a 300ohm load when you have a signal of course.But since you will only need a couple of volts in headphone use you should be able to manage at least 5-7 hrs with your battery before a recharge.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
|
Probably even more. Even with a 10 ohm resistor across it, you're still presenting an approximate 9 ohm load to the amp. You may be better off going with the 5 ohm resistor, since the output networks in the SI are designed around a 4 ohm load rather than an 8 ohm load.
Your battery life will depend on your playback levels. I would guess that with a 3.7Ah SLA, you'll probably get far more than 8 hours of play out of it. I guess worst case scenario. you can always get a bigger battery
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Be carefull usign this amp with headphones, there is a lot of ultrasound left in the output signal. Mostly around 1Mhz and at about 30-50mV P-P.
Putting a hi quality cap on the power supply rail on the PCB will drop ultrasonic hash by about 6dB. I've found that a Panasonic FM series electrolytic works as well as any film cap (Solen or other) and they are smaller and cheaper. It should help your transients too. The SI uses about 70mA at idle. It can use as much as an amp or more running hard into 8ohms. Double that for 4 ohms. The 1st day I used mine the AA batteries lasted about 5 hours driving very hard into 4 ohms, music uses less power than full volume test tones, natch. YMMV.
__________________
Take the Speaker Voltage Test! |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
|
Quote:
Best, Paul |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
|
Has anyone seen a schematic of the SI amp? I vaguely remember see an attempt by someone to reverse engineer it. I already have the Tripath pdf but am hoping to see something closer to the SI which I know has different parts values...
Thanks, Paul |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle
|
The SI is very similar to the Tripath datasheet. I think the major differences are:
1) There is an inductor at the input along with a 10k resistor to ground, prior to the DC blocking capacitor 2) The DC blocking capacitor is 0.33ufd instead of 2.2uf 3) The feedback resistor is 36k instead of 20k Panomaniac has documented what he's found in this thread: Sonic Tripath Investigations And has put up a schematic of the input here: http://www.michael.mardis.com/sonic/.../input-new.gif I believe panomaniac is still working on documenting the output section. You may find more information at audiocircle.com. Anyohw, you might want to search the forums, since there's a couple of threads documenting this information ![]() Good luck! |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US, New Jersey
|
I hope this posting is not off topic...
My Sonic Impact 20 something dollars BLEW up yesterday... Why? Because I connected it to my electrostatic speakers, it did play for a second or two and then gave up...Took it to a pair of dynamic speakers (the ones I had it connected to previously)...and nothing, not a note of music...Caput!... Now I would like somebody to help me to unsderstand why didn't this amplifier like my ESL's, they have an aproximate capacity of 1,200 pf, but in between there is an impedance transformer. Another words the amplifiers always see 8 ohms as the impedance load... Please, can anyone explain to me why do electrostatics are so peculiar about the amplifiers they are connected to? I'd really apreciate some light...
__________________
JLH 2005, Cyrus and so on... |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Athens+Addis Ababa
|
Probably some kind of oscillation into hi capacitance.Donīt forget the transformer you are using will also increase the capacitance seen by the amp output.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US, New Jersey
|
You've got a good point there, I didn't think of that...
But on the other hand I've heard stories about regular class AB amps with bipolar transistors at the output that dont react very well either to the ESL. I've never found a credible (or not so) explanation why push pull amplifiers get destroyed as soon as you plug the ESL's. To me is a technical mistery, however any tube or solid state class A work really well with them. I have both and I enjoy my speakers, but yesterday was a day to forget and I'm thinking, would the ESL destroy the Class D module I'm working on now? That's a risk that I don't to take, this module is expensive, not the rinky dink SI cheap one. Morou? Obrigado seu brasuca....
__________________
JLH 2005, Cyrus and so on... |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sonic impact t-amp problem/question. | doogyscoot | Class D | 2 | 6th August 2008 03:05 PM |
| Sonic Impact -> Panasonic EVJ wiring question | mitchbyu | Class D | 3 | 22nd May 2007 04:07 PM |
| bi-amping with sonic impact t amp/using sonic impact amp for headphones | jon_m | Class D | 3 | 16th February 2006 10:16 AM |
| Sonic Impact's Potentiometer Question | HolyGhostFire20 | Class D | 0 | 30th December 2005 12:23 AM |
| Sonic Impact mod question | canecreekcabin | Class D | 5 | 24th November 2005 11:20 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12133 seconds (82.26% PHP - 17.74% MySQL) with 10 queries |