“King” of the DIY amps? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Class D

Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th February 2005, 10:27 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
Default “King” of the DIY amps?

(This thread is of equal interest to this and the Chip Amp forum: not sure which to post to, so it’s in both)

Yes they produce significantly different wattages, by very different methods;
but if either produces enough watts for your purpose (sometimes more watts giving more headroom and or better bass control),
with as far as possible same quality power supplies and needed intimal components

Which sounds better, the gainclone or the UcD180 (www.hypex.nl)?

Who's heard both?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2005, 11:15 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
The specific question that triggered the broader question, was the need to drive two Peerless XLS 12s per channel in the (nearly complete) SL Phoenix woofers.

The effective driver load impedances (being active, each driver is only used over part of its frequency range) are 6.5 ohms.
SL says (www.linkwitzlab.com/faq.htm#Q39) that each woofer channel is easily served by a 50 W amplifier.
A number use an amp per driver.

* So, one 50 W gainclone (3886) per driver, or one UcD per channel ?

* I think the general question is even more important.

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2005, 02:31 PM   #3
subwo1 is offline subwo1  United States
diyAudio Member
 
subwo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North American Continent
I'd say that the UcD can pump out full power more effortlessly than the 3886. So my vote is for UcD.

I am working on a UcD type circuit which is simpler than the circuits we've been looking at. If I am happy with it, I foresee just one main compromise compared to the conventional topology. Almost everything else is advantageous. I am keeping my fingers crossed, if you pardon the expression. Now, it will be a simulation, which is the one cautionary thing about it.
__________________
USMPS
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/switchmode/
  Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2005, 02:47 PM   #4
mac is offline mac  United States
diyAudio Member
 
mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Puget Sound
FWIW, I'm using a single UcD400 to drive my Phoenix-inspired W-frame dipole woofers (two SCC300's in parallel). I could not imagine using a "gainclone" type amp for this application given the alternative.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2005, 07:04 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
subwo1
Keep us posted!

Mac

If you’re driving the drivers in parallel, yes. If you were to use the gainclone, you’d connect in series and do one amp/ driver. Parallel will go (depending on Hz), louder.
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2005, 10:19 PM   #6
OA51 is offline OA51  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Trollhattan (Saab town)
I have built the UcD180, the UcD400 and a BGT GainClone...

the hypex sounds better!

/Stefan
__________________
Electronic's - compressed smoke...
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2005, 07:53 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
Hi Stefan

Could you elaborate - in bass/ mids/ treble? Dynamics? Detail? Smoothness?

Driving what speakers . .

By much??

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2005, 02:43 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
chris ma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pickering, Canada
Quote:
Originally posted by OA51
I have built the UcD180, the UcD400 and a BGT GainClone...

the hypex sounds better!

/Stefan
What are the differences in price?

Regards,
Chris
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2005, 03:38 PM   #9
OA51 is offline OA51  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Trollhattan (Saab town)
rick57

imho better in all of them: bass/ mids/ treble Dynamics Detail Smoothness...

I have compared them on my speakers, Carlsson OA51.3 (Scanspeak 18W8545 and a special OEM Vifa tweeter)...

My hypex, I have tested on B&W Nautilus 802 and they did a very nice job... even compared with the owners 10000$ Chord amp.

I'm not saying that the Gainclone is bad in any way... just that the hypex amps are better...

they are also more expensive, the hypex modules are > 3 times the price of BGT gainclone-kit. With the total price for building an amp the differance is even higher...

/Stefan
__________________
Electronic's - compressed smoke...
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2005, 09:12 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: dry ol Melbourne Australia
Stefan
I’m still waiting on a price when the local (Australian) supplier receives his first shipment. I recall someone saying the UcD180 was about $US60? dearer than BGT GainClone.
When you factor in time, and extra power (if that’s useful with whatever speakers you have), that seems almost trivial. Though the PS will be extra.

How did the 180 compared to the 400?

Cheers
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thanks Mr King marec Full Range 9 29th January 2009 03:32 AM
The "King of Instruments" is dead, long live the king jackinnj Instruments and Amps 0 26th May 2005 12:47 PM
“King” of the DIY amps? rick57 Chip Amps 2 16th February 2005 07:17 PM
The King is dead, God save the King! destroyer X Solid State 18 16th October 2004 12:37 PM
ANALOG(UE) is KING davesaudio Everything Else 1 14th November 2003 04:17 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:51 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2