|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#501 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Henrik,
I am sorry but my answer is no. The overvoltage protection works at 68VDC........ We recommend for the highest sonic performance a voltage between 50V and 63VDC. On the other hand a low impedance of even 1 ohm is no problem for the UcD400. Actually in our testsetup we use 1 ohm to check if the amp delivers the maximum current of +/-20A piek. In the THD versus Power curve the THD stays nice below 0.05% ![]() Regards, Jan-Peter |
|
|
|
#502 | |
|
Account Disabled
|
Quote:
Or whatever graphs you posted before for the UCD400 done on the new version would be neat too. You must have some kicking around? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#503 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Ok!
Tomorrow I will post some graphs. Jan-Peter |
|
|
|
#504 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: southern finland
|
I'm planning to put the amp in a box together with a xls10 and two passive radiators each with a 100g extra weight. The only thing between the ucd400 and my amplifiers sub output will be some copper and a pot. What's a good value for that pot?
|
|
|
|
#505 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chilliwack BC
|
Hi, is there an answer to the question Brian Lewis brought up earlier on the DC offset of the UCD400 and a way of getting rid of it???
Al |
|
|
|
#506 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Japan
|
Quote:
Of the UcD180 modules that I have, the DC offset at the output is in the order of 20-30mV or so, measured it a while ago, so may not be exactly that, guess it will be similar for the UcD400. I don't know if that is too much for certain ribbon drivers? I don't think it is that easy to get even lower offset, using DC servo circuits? Gertjan |
|
|
|
|
#507 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Antwerp
|
Quote:
Just think about how much $$$ you have to drop on a class AB monoblock that is stable to 1 ohms and can deliver 20A.... |
|
|
|
|
#508 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Japan
|
Quote:
Hello Yves, As far as I understand it, this 20A is where the protection starts to kick-in. It means you should be able to have 20A all the time, just if you ask for 21A, the protection circuit will prevent you from doing that :-) 20A peak is very good since with a 4 Ohm load and say 56V peak voltage at the output (for 400W in 4 Ohm) the module "only" has to deliver a peak current of 14A, so at 3 Ohm you could get about 530Watt. If you bridge two modules (I plan to do that for my woofers, you can just get 800W at 4 Ohm. That should be enough to rock my house without actually having an earthquake :-). However, I have dipole woofers that can use some power. Best regards Gertjan |
|
|
|
|
#509 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Antwerp
|
Quote:
That's why I asked... My speakers are 8 ohm but have nasty drops to 3. If Ucd400's can pump 530W (ideally) into each channel continously at 3 ohms, that is just amazing... No surround receiver can do such a thing (except the new denon 5.... something, but that thing is a 5000$ beast) - a huge toroid and lots of caps will take care of the rest ![]() When I complete my amp i'm going to test it on a friends disco-setup
|
|
|
|
|
#510 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Quote:
Regards, Jan-Peter |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UCD400 Amp | john65b | Swap Meet | 4 | 12th November 2007 11:08 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |