|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#581 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Argentina
|
for an subwoofer an UCD180 is the best choicE?
|
|
|
|
#582 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: tielt-winge
|
Hello all,
a question about dc protection of the speakers: is it necessary to protect the connected speakers with a dc protection relay? What happens if one of the mosfets fails (short circuit) to +/- power? Related to this, if I do you use such a dc protection, can the UCD work properly with no load connected to it? regards, Ludo |
|
|
|
#583 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
|
Quote:
The Zappulse needed a LOT of breaking in. It's had >100 hours so far and it's still softening up. At first it was very "harsh", and had a lot of "ringing" in the upper treble. This has softened quite a lot now, but I would have to have another good listen to really see whether it's really gone completely. My reference amp is a Meridian 557, and in comparison the Zappulse has *incredible* imaging! Everything is very well positioned, and little things with ambience (like a glass smashing) suddenly have a real ambience and a sense of spaciousness. In the example of the glass smashing I had a sudden feeling of the glass pieces scattering backwards into the stereo image and even outside to the speakers. I have never heard anything like that from my Meridian (Speakers are Proac 1.5 by the way) However, at least up until very recently I didn't enjoy turning the Zappulse up beyond easy listening levels. It just became "harsh" and annoying - not very pleasant at all to my ear. It has smoothed off a lot as it's broken in though, and it's on the bench at the moment so I won't be using it again for a few days (got the Meridian in again to compare). I hope to see some more reviews of UCD vs other designs (tripath, etc). Also anyone else who is familiar with what I am describing about treble harshness and ringing might put my mind at rest that I am not inventing these things! I am using a similar powersupply to Gertjan by the way. Thanks Gertjan, and well done Hypex! |
|
|
|
|
#584 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BE/NL/RW/ZA
|
Quote:
UcD is completely stable and functional under no-load conditions, even if you clip it. |
|
|
|
|
#585 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: -
|
Ludo,
Indeed in a case of failure you will have DC at the output of the UcD modules. We are working on some powersupply board herein will also be a DC protection. When you have some costly loudspeakers it is good idee to use a DC protection. Use a relay to switch the + and - powerlines in a case of DC. On the Forum there must be enough schematics for a good DC detecting circuit. Regards, Jan-Peter www.hypex.nl |
|
|
|
#586 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
#587 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Japan
|
Quote:
Hi Sjef, I on purpose did not do any correction with the PDC, just corrected the gain since the ZAPpulse has higher gain. I did not want to do a correction since I want to listen to the differences between the amps. Best regards Gertjan |
|
|
|
|
#588 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Japan
|
Quote:
About the 6 channels that I need, I will not built a 6 channel amp. I will built two stereo amps to be used for mid and high, each stere amp will have its own power supply, so one mid and high amp share a power supply. Then for the woofers, I`ll built two monoblocks. Gertjan |
|
|
|
|
#589 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Japan
|
Quote:
Hi Ed, Sorry, I had no time for a few hundred hours break-in, both ZAPpulse and UcD have only played for 10-20hrs or so. Imaging is very good for both ZAPpulse and UcD, as you noted for the ZAPpulse. Both amps are clearly better sounding than the Marantz Tripath. I have not listened to extreme soundlevels, so can not really confirm the issues that you have noted. About the noise, as I said, noise level is similar as for the Tripath, but higher than my Accuphase, the UcD is extremely silent. Do you find the ZAPPulse noise level to be high in comparison with your Meridian? I guess that especially for users with active speakers, the noise level can be an issue, especially with higher sensitivity tweeters and mid drivers. For me that is the case, although my tweeters are not exteremely efficient, the UcD gives me more dynamic range when listening at low levels because of the lower noise floor. When you always listen at relatively high level and with passive speakers, the noise difference may not be an issue. I`m a bit surprised that I have never heard any comments about the noise from other ZAPpulse users. Is it because my Accuphase is very silent in comparison with other amps? Best regards Gertjan |
|
|
|
|
#590 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
I have both the ZapPulse 2.2SE and the UCD180 stock running. The noise on the Zap is very annoying... nothing I can do will make it go away, however some things minimize it to the point where is only audible with the ear next to the speaker. The sound quality of the Zap kills the stock UCD180, but I have also modded the Zap beyond the original form and use it with the clock frequency at 750kHz. But hey, this modded Zap kills the stock Zap too...
I am going to mod-up the UCD180 soon with AD8620 and no coupling caps. Ar there any other suggestions on essential mods to include on the UCD? KW |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16924 seconds (80.21% PHP - 19.79% MySQL) with 11 queries |