|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
schematic of ramp and comparator
__________________
The Power Fanatic |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Schematic
__________________
The Power Fanatic |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Is there any difference made by large propagation delays?
__________________
The Power Fanatic |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany / Bavaria / Augsburg
|
You mean propagation delay in the opto devices?
As long as the delay is the same for both devices and for rising and falling signals I donīt see any problem. It will just result in a total delay, but not affect the signal. You just cannot add any NFB as it would be out of time.
__________________
Best Regards, Cybergent |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
THIS is RAMP GENERATOR SCHEMATIC
Switching Frequency=15KHz
__________________
The Power Fanatic |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
Quote:
Feedback is mainly affected by the switching frequency. The unity gain point shouldn't be higher than half the switching frequency. Edit: Forgot to mention that this statement is only valid for carrier-based class-d amps. For self oscillating designs the unity-gain point is higher, since we deliberately want instability in order to cause oscillation. This increases the amount of NFB that can be applied for a given switching frequency. Regards Charles |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
[B]Does self oscillating designs are more excellent and give better performance.
__________________
The Power Fanatic |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
|
I have never built a self-oscillating class-d amp (only carrier-based ones). The highly- praised Philips amps are self-oscillating so are the B&O ones (and also Lars' ZAP-pulse).
I only know the difference from simulations where the self-oscillating ones seem to be a little better as well (but simulations are simulations and real-world is real-world). It is easier to take feedback from the output filter for self-oscillating topologies. Apart from simplicity there are other advantages (one of them is good supply voltage suppression). Some members here have built self-oscillating designs and they are convinced about their quality. I by myself like the good carrier suppression one can achieve with carrier-based designs. Therefore I will build one in a feww weeks. It will also take feedback from the output filter (which is a little trickier than doing it with a self-oscillating design, but definitely not impossible). Regards Charles |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Back in Singapore
|
Hi guys,
this is really interesting, if anyone gets a working prototype working, do shout it out. I'd like to try my hand building one too. Regards |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This is output schematic:
__________________
The Power Fanatic |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Class-D Amp with Discrete Gate Drivers | Workhorse | Class D | 63 | 17th April 2008 09:05 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09167600 seconds (78.24% PHP - 21.76% MySQL) with 11 queries |