|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Class D Switching Power Amplifiers and Power D/A conversion |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#41 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
I will have to try out your idea. One problem for me though is that my Class-D amps are the most transparent and clear of all the amps I have. I am expecting a Decware SE84 and it might be transparent enough to judge the effect of an output filter.
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
The Audio Research 150.2 amp arrived and I have compared it to my amp. The Audio Research Amp is a Class-D amp just like my DIY amp. Audio Research is one of the oldest and most respected high end manuf. The amp has gotten rave reviews from nearly everyone who has reviewed it; the most common comments are that it is very neutral, has a large sound stage, is "tube like", and is smooth sounding. The AR retailed for $3,000 in 2004.
After I hooked the AR up, I immediately turned it up as loud as I've been listening to my DIY amp. It was obvious right away, I don't like the AR amp. It is edgy in the highs and surprisingly, vocals are harsh when someone shouts, which is one of my pet peeves. Those are the things that are deal breakers for me. The AR has more sibilance than mine (too much for my taste). Another difference is that my amp has more extreme highs than the AR, some have commented that the AR is "polite", and my amp probably is still a bit too hot in the extreme highs. My amp has a larger sound stage, mostly because it's sound is light weight in the low midrange compared to the AR, but I could change that as you know. Ambience comes through more clearly, on my amp. My amp is also light weight in the bass compared to the AR, but I can also adjust that too. The AR has a very high input impedance, 150,000 ohms, and Sure DIY amps have a low input impedance. That hasn't been a problem for me yet. I haven't tested it, but the AR amp will probably sound better on 8 ohm speakers since I designed my amp specifically for my 4.6 ohm speakers. Another advantage the AR has is that it is about three times more powerful than my amp. However, to prove to myself that my amp is capable of driving my low sensitivity speakers, I turned the sound up till the loud parts hurt my ears and it stayed clean. I know for sure now that I am on the right track I am a truly happy person. James |
|
|
|
#43 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
I also want to add that there is nothing special about my DIY amp. All I have done is match the output filter to my speakers, tweaked the sound to my preferences and put PIO caps in place of the input caps. That's all. I honestly think I could take any other DIY amp on this forum and it would equal or be better than my amp and the AR amp, or I could tweak it to my ear so it was.
I also don't think that matching your output filter to your speakers is anything magic. You can get just as good results with the conventional approach. I did however find my DIY amp easier to tweak (the sound) with the matched output filter in place. |
|
|
|
#44 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
|
James i copied my results as you asked in your thread here .
Finished modding the sure board 2*100 TK2050 for 4ohm loads. So here it is : Zobel 0.47uf - 10 ohm. The rest capacitors on the output are 0.47uf . The differential mode capacitor was changed to 0.22uf instead of 0.1uf . The funny thing here is that in the beginning i used wima mkp4 caps (sound was ok) then changed them with with ero mkt1822 (not so good) & then i used RIFA PHE426 & the sound is amazing, very high end i may say. I changed the inductors with 10u ones. I put 1 2200uf (also 1000uf works fine)nichicon muse cap per channel & 2 panasonic fc 470uf at the 5v rail. And the most imroved thing to do is disconnect the fan and supply it with an external power supply ( i used a modile phone charger with on/off switch), that worked great. Input caps are 2.2uf ERO MKC1862 (rare polycarbonate) bypassed with mkp1837 33nf. This is it James. Sure board now is one of my favourites BUT YOU NEED TO SPEND SOME MONEY & TIME ON IT !!! Now i will deal with the T2 from HiFimeDIY !!! Will post pictures soon. |
|
|
|
#45 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Anonymityville
|
Here's a neat online RLC calculator that gives a results graph......
RLC Low-Pass Filter Design Tool Don't forget we're trying to shoot for adequate attenuation at the switching frequency as well. This isn't a HAM forum; let's not build radio transmitters.
__________________
"If you don't like funerals don't kick sand in Ninja's face." - Ninja |
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
|
I put my zobel back to 0.22uF 10 Ohms . In the end I felt like the highs became too weirdo with 0.1uF as Cz.
jyoung Take a look here at the 2.2.5 Swapping out the Output Capacitors Last edited by Virpz; 3rd February 2012 at 04:22 PM. Reason: link |
|
|
|
#48 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
|
Quote:
Remember though, if you don't also calculate, then change the output filter itself, then changing just the zobel to the calculated values will probably only make things sound worse. In the conventional output filter, what everyone is using on class-d, the zobel is deliberately not matched to the speakers, but is used to control the peak or rolloff that results when the amp is used with a range of speaker impedances. When the output filter is correctly designed, so the filter and zobel work together, then there is very little change in response when going from 4 ohm to 8 ohm speakers. As shown in Mr. Marshals tutorial. What we want to do here is match our amp exactly to our speakers. This gives us a much flatter response to start from for tweaking to our liking. |
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
[QUOTE=
About the mids, I haven't given enough thought to all the ramifications of output filters for mids. Again, hazarding a guess, the effect of the output filter is high enough that it probably won't have a great effect on your results. Also, if you are using a second order or greater analog low pass, or greater, on your mid, and if you moved the filter to immediately after the amp, you should be able to get rid of the entire output filter and zobel, since all the output filter does is get rid of the switching frequency and the mid, and woofer too, low pass will do that for you. You don't want the switching frequency running down the speaker wires, hence the move of the filter. If you are using an active system, I think it might be best to leave the output filter in since the switching frequency messes with electronics.[/QUOTE] I though about what you said, and have couple of questions. Can I use passive 1st order low pass filter before amp and totaly get rid of output filter? I gues I can if its filter out swiching frequency of 650Mh at least as good as second order output filter. For now I run my midrange just with 0.1uf input cap to filter out lows. But it could cross better with planar tweeter at 7000-10000hz and not running full range Here is some simulations: ![]() This is standart output of hifimediy t1, t2 amp with 10uh coils and 0,47uf caps wich gives corner frequency of 73,4 kHz and filters out about 37db at 650MHz. http://content22-foto.inbox.lv/album...put-filter.jpg Simulation of 1st order lowpass at amps input, Cut-off frequency 7234Hz, filters -40db at 650MHz. |
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Reykjavík
|
Quote:
There is a significant amount of rather high-power radio-frequency signal present on the unfiltered output. This high-frequency component is created in the amp, and is an unavoidable side-effect in a Class-D amplifier. This signal is not present on the input side, so it can't be filtered there. This high-frequency signal will A) radiate from the speaker wires and can interfere with any electronics nearby, and B) the not insignificant 600KHz signal will also go through the speaker voice coil and may fry your speaker, and most certainly create audible distortion. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F2J Speakers match | mc297 | Pass Labs | 6 | 27th January 2012 05:29 AM |
| Need to match filter with woofer natural slope | oaristys | Multi-Way | 6 | 31st December 2011 04:11 PM |
| How do you match output tubes? | Bobby Dipole | Tubes / Valves | 24 | 5th November 2010 01:25 AM |
| Speakers to match GC?? | monkey_zu | Solid State | 0 | 20th September 2004 05:08 AM |
| Amp to match speakers | dlagace | Solid State | 1 | 28th November 2003 10:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12716 seconds (81.81% PHP - 18.19% MySQL) with 11 queries |